Assessing the potential of different satellite soil moisture products in landslide hazard assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 112583
Author(s):  
Binru Zhao ◽  
Qiang Dai ◽  
Lu Zhuo ◽  
Shaonan Zhu ◽  
Qi Shen ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana Khan ◽  
Dalia B. Kirschbaum ◽  
Thomas Stanley ◽  
Pukar Amatya ◽  
Robert Emberson

<p>Numerical weather models are used in a variety of applications, including a growing body of landslide hazard assessment models. Heretofore, these applications have not included global landslide forecasts but this remains an important gap in better understanding the future spatiotemporal impact that landslides can have on populations and infrastructure. We explore the feasibility of using a precipitation forecast within the Landslide Hazard Assessment for Situational Awareness (LHASA) v2.0 model, which is designed to provide estimates of potential landslide hazard for rainfall triggers. Data on precipitation, soil moisture, and snow mass is available from NASA’s Goddard Earth Observing System Forward Processing product (GEOS-FP), which provides global scale products in both forecast and assimilation modes. These variables are incorporated into the LHASA Forecast model by replacing satellite rainfall estimates from the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) with forecasted rainfall from GEOS-FP. The LHASA Forecast model also uses soil moisture and snow mass estimates from GEOS-FP rather than soil moisture and snow mass data from the Soil Moisture Active-Passive (SMAP) level 4 product. The LHASA Forecast model was run retrospectively at a daily scale with forecasted precipitation with up to a 3 day lead time. Results are compared with the LHASA v2.0 model that uses SMAP and IMERG data. Analysis of the LHASA Forecast system was conducted in several different ways. First, performance was assessed with categorical and continuous statics to determine how closely the forecasted probabilities match that of the LHASA v2.0 nowcast landslide probabilities. The outputs of LHASA v2.0 and LHASA Forecast are also compared for several high impact rainfall events that triggered landslides to determine the skill in identifying the potential high hazard areas. Preliminary results suggest that for large precipitation events (e.g. tropical storms), the same general hazard areas are identified; however, this can vary largely by geography and precipitation regime, owing to differences in spatial resolution and phase errors of the forecasted precipitation. This presentation outlines the preliminary work to address forecasted landslide hazard globally and discusses next steps towards improving landslide forecast skill.</p><p> </p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Stanley ◽  
Dalia Kirschbaum ◽  
Robert Emberson

<p>The Landslide Hazard Assessment for Situational Awareness system (LHASA) gives a global view of landslide hazard in nearly real time. Currently, it is being upgraded from version 1 to version 2, which entails improvements along several dimensions. These include the incorporation of new predictors, machine learning, and new event-based landslide inventories. As a result, LHASA version 2 substantially improves on the prior performance and introduces a probabilistic element to the global landslide nowcast.</p><p>Data from the soil moisture active-passive (SMAP) satellite has been assimilated into a globally consistent data product with a latency less than 3 days, known as SMAP Level 4. In LHASA, these data represent the antecedent conditions prior to landslide-triggering rainfall. In some cases, soil moisture may have accumulated over a period of many months. The model behind SMAP Level 4 also estimates the amount of snow on the ground, which is an important factor in some landslide events. LHASA also incorporates this information as an antecedent condition that modulates the response to rainfall. Slope, lithology, and active faults were also used as predictor variables. These factors can have a strong influence on where landslides initiate. LHASA relies on precipitation estimates from the Global Precipitation Measurement mission to identify the locations where landslides are most probable. The low latency and consistent global coverage of these data make them ideal for real-time applications at continental to global scales. LHASA relies primarily on rainfall from the last 24 hours to spot hazardous sites, which is rescaled by the local 99<sup>th</sup> percentile rainfall. However, the multi-day latency of SMAP requires the use of a 2-day antecedent rainfall variable to represent the accumulation of rain between the antecedent soil moisture and current rainfall.</p><p>LHASA merges these predictors with XGBoost, a commonly used machine-learning tool, relying on historical landslide inventories to develop the relationship between landslide occurrence and various risk factors. The resulting model relies heavily on current daily rainfall, but other factors also play an important role. LHASA outputs the probability of landslide occurrence on a grid of roughly one kilometer over all continents from 60 North to 60 South latitude. Evaluation over the period 2019-2020 shows that LHASA version 2 doubles the accuracy of the global landslide nowcast without increasing the global false alarm rate.</p><p>LHASA also identifies the areas where the human exposure to landslide hazard is most intense. Landslide hazard is divided into 4 levels: minimal, low, moderate, and high. Next, the number of persons and the length of major roads (primary and secondary roads) within each of these areas is calculated for every second-level administrative district (county). These results can be viewed through a web portal hosted at the Goddard Space Flight Center. In addition, users can download daily hazard and exposure data.</p><p>LHASA version 2 uses machine learning and satellite data to identify areas of probable landslide hazard within hours of heavy rainfall. Its global maps are significantly more accurate, and it now includes rapid estimates of exposed populations and infrastructure. In addition, a forecast mode will be implemented soon.</p>


2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 548-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Huabin ◽  
Liu Gangjun ◽  
Xu Weiya ◽  
Wang Gonghui

In recent years, landslide hazard assessment has played an important role in developing land utilization regulations aimed at minimizing the loss of lives and damage to property. A variety of approaches has been used in landslide assessment and these can be classified into qualitative factor overlay, statistical models, geotechnical process models, etc. However, there is little work on the satisfactory integration of these models with geographic information systems (GIS) to support slope management and landslide hazard mitigation. This paper deals with several aspects of landslide hazard assessment by presenting a focused review of GIS-based landslide hazard assessment: it starts with a framework for GIS-based assessment of landslide hazard; continues with a critical review of the state of the art in using GIS and digital elevation models (DEM) for mapping and modelling landslide hazards; and concludes with a description of an integrated system for effective landslide hazard assessment and zonation incorporating artificial intelligence and data mining technology in a GIS-based framework of knowledge discovery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document