scholarly journals Microalgae biofilm in soil: Greenhouse gas emissions, ammonia volatilization and plant growth

2017 ◽  
Vol 574 ◽  
pp. 1640-1648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackeline de Siqueira Castro ◽  
Maria Lúcia Calijuri ◽  
Paula Peixoto Assemany ◽  
Paulo Roberto Cecon ◽  
Igor Rodrigues de Assis ◽  
...  
Geoderma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 346 ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Feng Liang ◽  
Jing An ◽  
Jun-Qin Gao ◽  
Xiao-Ya Zhang ◽  
Ming-Hua Song ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Gui ◽  
R. Inamori ◽  
M. Matsumura ◽  
Y. Inamori

Domestic wastewater is a significant source of nitrogen and phosphorus, which cause lake eutrophication. Among the wastewater treatment technologies, constructed wetlands are a promising low-cost means of treating point and diffuse sources of domestic wastewater in rural areas. However, the sustainable operation of constructed wetland treatment systems depends upon a high rate conversion of organic and nitrogenous loading into their metabolic gaseous end products, such as N2O and CH4. In this study, we examined and compared the performance of three typical types of constructed wetlands: Free Water Surface (FWS), Subsurface Flow (SF) and Vertical Flow (VF) wetlands. Pollutant removal efficiency and N2O and CH4 emissions were assessed as measures of performance. We found that the pollutant removal rates and gas emissions measured in the wetlands exhibited clear seasonal changes, and these changes were closely associated with plant growth. VF wetlands exhibited stable removal of organic pollutants and NH3-N throughout the experiment regardless of season and showed great potential for CH4 adsorption. SF wetlands showed preferable T-N removal performance and a lower risk of greenhouse gas emissions than FWS wetlands. Soil oxidation reduction potential (ORP) analysis revealed that water flow structure and plant growth influenced constructed wetland oxygen transfer, and these variations resulted in seasonal changes of ORP distribution inside wetlands that were accompanied by fluctuations in pollutant removal and greenhouse gas emissions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 104924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afnan Khalil Ahmad Suleiman ◽  
Késia Silva Lourenço ◽  
Callum Clark ◽  
Ronildson Lima Luz ◽  
Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro da Silva ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 191 ◽  
pp. 39-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Schimmelpfennig ◽  
Christoph Müller ◽  
Ludger Grünhage ◽  
Christian Koch ◽  
Claudia Kammann

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1179
Author(s):  
Judith Naamala ◽  
Donald L. Smith

Climate change has already affected food security in many parts of the world, and this situation will worsen if nothing is done to combat it. Unfortunately, agriculture is a meaningful driver of climate change, through greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogen-based fertilizer, methane from animals and animal manure, as well as deforestation to obtain more land for agriculture. Therefore, the global agricultural sector should minimize greenhouse gas emissions in order to slow climate change. The objective of this review is to point out the various ways plant growth promoting microorganisms (PGPM) can be used to enhance crop production amidst climate change challenges, and effects of climate change on more conventional challenges, such as: weeds, pests, pathogens, salinity, drought, etc. Current knowledge regarding microbial inoculant technology is discussed. Pros and cons of single inoculants, microbial consortia and microbial compounds are discussed. A range of microbes and microbe derived compounds that have been reported to enhance plant growth amidst a range of biotic and abiotic stresses, and microbe-based products that are already on the market as agroinputs, are a focus. This review will provide the reader with a clearer understanding of current trends in microbial inoculants and how they can be used to enhance crop production amidst climate change challenges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document