scholarly journals The (not so) immortal strand hypothesis

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian Tomasetti ◽  
Ivana Bozic
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 170 (5) ◽  
pp. 721-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Karpowicz ◽  
Cindi Morshead ◽  
Angela Kam ◽  
Eric Jervis ◽  
John Ramunas ◽  
...  

The immortal strand hypothesis proposes that asymmetrically dividing stem cells (SCs) selectively segregate chromosomes that bear the oldest DNA templates. We investigated cosegregation in neural stem cells (NSCs). After exposure to the thymidine analogue 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU), which labels newly synthesized DNA, a subset of neural precursor cells were shown to retain BrdU signal. It was confirmed that some BrdU-retaining cells divided actively, and that these cells exhibited some characteristics of SCs. This asymmetric partitioning of DNA then was demonstrated during mitosis, and these results were further supported by real time imaging of SC clones, in which older and newly synthesized DNA templates were distributed asymmetrically after DNA synthesis. We demonstrate that NSCs are unique among precursor cells in the uneven partitioning of genetic material during cell divisions.


Cell ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Lew ◽  
Daniel J. Burke ◽  
Anindya Dutta
Keyword(s):  

Cell ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 129 (7) ◽  
pp. 1239-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Rando
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane A. Wakeman ◽  
Abdelkrim Hmadcha ◽  
Bernat Soria ◽  
Ramsay J. McFarlane

AbstractCairns first suggested a mechanism for protecting the genomes of stem cells (SCs) from replicative errors some 40 years ago when he proposed the immortal strand hypothesis, which argued for the inheritance of a so-called immortal strand by an SC following asymmetric SC divisions. To date, the existence of immortal strands remains contentious with published evidence arguing in favour of and against the retention of an immortal strand by asymmetrically dividing SCs. The conflicting evidence is derived from a diverse array of studies on adult SC types and is predominantly based on following the fate of labelled DNA strands during asymmetric cell division events. Here, we review current data, highlighting limitations of such labelling techniques, and suggest how interpretation of such data may be improved in the future.


2005 ◽  
Vol 170 (7) ◽  
pp. 1169-1169
Author(s):  
Phillip Karpowicz ◽  
Cindi Morshead ◽  
Angela Kam ◽  
Eric Jervis ◽  
John Ramunas ◽  
...  

Genetics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 174 (3) ◽  
pp. 1069-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Cairns
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chatarin Wangsanuwat ◽  
Javier F. Aldeguer ◽  
Nicolas C. Rivron ◽  
Siddharth S. Dey

AbstractLineage reconstruction is central to understanding tissue development and maintenance. While powerful tools to infer cellular relationships have been developed, these methods typically have a clonal resolution that prevent the reconstruction of lineage trees at an individual cell division resolution. Moreover, these methods require a transgene, which poses a significant barrier in the study of human tissues. To overcome these limitations, we report scPECLR, a probabilistic algorithm to endogenously infer lineage trees at a single cell-division resolution using 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. When applied to 8-cell preimplantation mouse embryos, scPECLR predicts the full lineage tree with greater than 95% accuracy. Further, scPECLR can accurately extract lineage information for a majority of cells when reconstructing larger trees. Finally, we show that scPECLR can also be used to map chromosome strand segregation patterns during cell division, thereby providing a strategy to test the “immortal strand” hypothesis in stem cell biology. Thus, scPECLR provides a generalized method to endogenously reconstruct lineage trees at an individual cell-division resolution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document