Stepping stone or stumbling block? Mode 2 knowledge production in sustainability science

Author(s):  
Henrik Thorén ◽  
Line Breian
Author(s):  
Gregory Heath

This chapter investigates how the modernised university might be transformed by the wider adoption of Mode-2 knowledge production. Mode-2 knowledge production, production of dispersed, team-based knowledge, as distinct from the traditional discipline-based Mode-1 knowledge production, was first identified and discussed by Gibbons et al. in 1994. Since then, the terminology has found its way into more general discourse about research and teaching and learning, but in that discourse, Mode-2 knowledge production has struggled to find the legitimacy and acceptance accorded to Mode-1. This is in spite of the fact that knowledge today is most often produced in collaboration, is transmitted in multi-mediated modalities, and utilised in transformative ways very often not envisioned by the generators of that knowledge. It is argued that the reason for the lack of acceptance lies in the fact that a supporting epistemology for Mode-2 knowledge has not, to date, been adequately developed. Thus, the chapter proposes that an epistemology based in philosophical or “American” pragmatism founded by Charles Sanders Peirce can be adopted to provide an articulated and well-grounded epistemology to support Mode-2 as a legitimate form of knowledge production.


2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (21) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Larry Stapleton ◽  
Janko Cernetic ◽  
Donald MacLean ◽  
Robert Macintosh

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Rafael Veit ◽  
Daniel Pacheco Lacerda ◽  
Luis Felipe Riehs Camargo ◽  
Liane Mahlmann Kipper ◽  
Aline Dresch

Purpose Research in business processes has been developed around a disciplinary approach toward the production of traditional knowledge, known as Mode 1. The problems studied with this approach are solved in a context in which academic knowledge prevails, with no major concerns regarding its practical applicability. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to propose a structure for knowledge production based on Mode 2 for business process researches. Design/methodology/approach A bibliometric research was conducted to define and conceptualize the classes of disciplinary problems, by assessing the years 2007-2012 of the Business Process Management Journal publications. Findings A framework for the Mode 2 knowledge production was proposed in the development of research in business process and conceptualized classes of problems related to this issue. Research limitations/implications This work was carried out with specific focus on research in business process, so the defined classes of problems cannot be generalized. Originality/value The studies identified by this research are in the form of a disciplinary approach toward the production of traditional knowledge, known as Mode 1. This paper aims to fill the gap of a transdisciplinary production of knowledge and practical application, known as Mode 2 in the context of business process.


2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-100
Author(s):  
Merle Jacob

The combination of decreasing public allocations to universities with relevance pressure from both governments and private corporations has contributed to the rise of the phenomenon of Mode 2 knowledge production. Many Mode 2 researchers have been encouraged and stimulated to experiment with new forms of organizing the production of knowledge while remaining within the context of the traditional European university. This has resulted in the emergence of number of new institutional formats including university based research centers or institutes and long-term research programs have emerged. While there has been a lively debate about the transitions in the landscape of knowledge production, it has failed to address its organizational details. A detailed look at transition cases pushed forward by political programs promoting knowledge exchange between university and industry shows that the institutionalization of Mode 2 is accompanied by significant problems for the management of research and the production of knowledge.


2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaston Heimeriks ◽  
Eleftheria Vasileiadou

Current changes in the science system, conceptualized as cyberscience, Mode 2 knowledge production or Triple Helix, have been debated heavily these last decades. This paper rearticulates these debates by studying the ways in which the emergence and use of ICTs have conditioned changes in the science system. We analyse these changes, based on empirical studies and theoretical conceptualizations, as an interaction at three levels: researching, scientizing and politicking. The analysis suggests that the main result of the use of ICTs in sciences is an additional layer of communication, providing heterogeneity on top of established patterns and allowing a recombination of new and established elements. Concepts of radical discontinuity in sciences are rejected and policy implications are offered on the basis of the analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document