A634 Revisional surgery from RYGB to sleeve gastrectomy plus JJB and hiatus hernia repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. S259-S260
Author(s):  
Jingge Yang ◽  
Bingsheng Guan ◽  
Tsz Hong Chong ◽  
Juzheng Peng ◽  
Cunchuan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hiatus Hernia ◽  
Revisional Surgery

Efficiency of Cruroplasty as a Treatment of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease in Morbid Obese Patients with Hiatus Hernia during SleeveGastrectomy

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Abbas Sabry ◽  
Youhanna Shohdy Shafik ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed Sabry ◽  
Andrew Nasr Faris Wanees
Keyword(s):  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Hiatal Hernia ◽  
Hiatus Hernia ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Hiatal Hernia Repair ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Gerd Symptoms

Abstract Background The effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is controversial. Although concomitant hiatal hernia repair (HHR) at the time of LSG is common and advocated by many, there are few data on the outcomes of GERD symptoms in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of concomitant HHR on GERD symptoms in morbidly obese patients undergoing LSG. Aim of the Work To analyse the impact of hiatal hernia repair (HHR) on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in morbidly obese patients with hiatus hernia undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Patients and Methods This is a retrospective cohart study. We collected the data of Patients who underwent lap sleeve gastrectomy with cruroplsty in the same operation in the period between July 2018 and July 2019. Results Before surgery, symptomatic GERD was present in 14 patients (70%), and HH was diagnosed In 20 patients (100%), HH was diagnosed pre-operatively. The mean follow-up was 6 months. GERD remission occurred in 18 patients (90%). In the remaining 2 patients, antireflux medications were diminished, with complete control of symptoms. HH recurrences developed in 1 patient (10%). "De novo" GERD symptoms developed in 22.9% of the patients undergoing SG alone compared with 0% of patients undergoing SG plus HHR. Conclusion SG with HHR is feasible and safe, providing good management of GERD in obese patients with reflux symptoms. Small hiatal defects could be underdiagnosed at preoperative endoscopy and/or upper gastrointestinal contrast study. Thus, a careful examination of the crura is always recommended intraoperatively.

Simultaneous Sleeve Gastrectomy and Hiatus Hernia Repair: a Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal K. Mahawar ◽  
William R. J. Carr ◽  
Neil Jennings ◽  
Shlok Balupuri ◽  
Peter K. Small
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hiatus Hernia

scholarly journals Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: Medium-Term Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip J. Dijkhorst ◽  
May Al Nawas ◽  
Laura Heusschen ◽  
Eric J. Hazebroek ◽  
Dingeman J. Swank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Weight Loss ◽  
Micronutrient Deficiencies ◽  
Single Anastomosis

Abstract Background Although the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has good short-term results, it comes with a significant number of patients requiring revisional surgery because of insufficient weight loss or functional complications. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass (SADI-S) versus the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on health outcomes in (morbidly) obese patients who had previously undergone SG, with up to 5 years of follow-up. Methods Data from patients who underwent revisional SADI-S or RYGB after SG were retrospectively compared on indication of surgery, weight loss, quality of life, micronutrient deficiencies, and complications. Results From 2007 to 2017, 141 patients received revisional laparoscopic surgery after SG in three specialized Dutch bariatric hospitals (SADI-S n=63, RYGB n=78). Percentage total weight loss following revisional surgery at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 22%, 24%, 22%, 18%, and 15% for SADI-S and 10%, 9%, 7%, 8%, and 2% for RYGB (P<.05 for 1–4 years). Patients who underwent RYGB surgery for functional complications experienced no persistent symptoms of GERD or dysphagia in 88% of cases. No statistical difference was found in longitudinal analysis of change in quality of life scores or cross-sectional analysis of complication rates and micronutrient deficiencies. Conclusion Conversion of SG to SADI-S leads to significantly more total weight loss compared to RYGB surgery with no difference in quality of life scores, complication rates, or micronutrient deficiencies. When GERD in sleeve patients has to be resolved, RYGB provides adequate outcomes. Graphical abstract

Spontaneous oesophageal perforation after laparoscopic hiatus hernia repair

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 887-888
Author(s):  
Martyn L. Humphreys ◽  
Bevan Jenkins ◽  
Jason Robertson ◽  
Michael Rodgers
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hiatus Hernia ◽  
Oesophageal Perforation

Short-Term Results of Single-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Abbas Sabry ◽  
Karim Sabry Abd-Elsamee ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed ◽  
Mohammed Mohamed Ahmed Abd-Elsalam
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gastric Bypass ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Weight Regain ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Metabolic Outcomes

Abstract Background It is already known that Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained popularity as a stand-alone procedure with good short-term results for weight loss. However, in the long-term, weight regain is considered as a complication. Demand for secondary surgery is rising, partly for this reason, but through that study we try to discover the efficacy of conversion of failed sleeve gastrectomy to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) regarding weight loss and metabolic outcomes. Objective To asses the efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) as a conversion surgery post Sleeve Gastrectomy failure as regard weight loss and metabolic outcomes. Patients and Methods This study is a retrospective cohort study which included 20 patients underwent one anastomosis gastric bypass at Ain-Shams University El-Demerdash Hospital, Cairo, Egypt and specialized bariatric center, Cairo, Egypt From February 2019 to July 2019 with 6 months of postoperative follow up till January 2019. Results In this study, we reviewed and analyzed the outcomes from the revision of the SG due to either inadequate weight loss or weight regain to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with %EBWL of 6.65% at 1 month, 13.61 % at 3 months and 20.86% at 6 months. Conclusion OAGB appears to be an effective and safe therapeutic technique as a revisional surgery for failed primary SG with good short-term results for treating morbid obesity and its associated comorbidities with a significantly low rate of complications. However the EBWL was less than what is reported after primary OAGB weight. Multicenter studies with larger series of patients and longer term follow up after SG revisions to OAGB are warranted.

657 ROUTINE ESOPHAGRAMS FOLLOWING HIATUS HERNIA REPAIR MINIMISES REOPERATIVE MORBIDITY: A MULTICENTER COMPARATIVE COHORT STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Liu ◽  
Melissa Wee ◽  
James Grantham ◽  
Bee Ong ◽  
Stephanie Ng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hiatus Hernia ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Gastric Resection ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Early Complications ◽  
Esophageal Obstruction ◽  
Comparative Cohort Study ◽  
One Year

Abstract   Hiatus hernia repairs are common. Early complications such as re-herniation, esophageal obstruction and perforation, although infrequent, incur significant morbidity. Here, we determine whether routine postoperative esophagrams following hiatus hernia repair may expedite the surgical management of these complications, reduce reoperative morbidity, and improve functional outcomes. Methods Analysis of a prospectively-maintained database of 1829 hiatus hernia repairs undertaken in 14 hospitals from 1 January 2000 to 30 September 2020. 1571 (85.9%) patients underwent a postoperative esophagram which was reviewed. An early (&lt;14 days) reoperation was performed in 44 (2.4%) patients. Results Compared to those without an esophagram, patients who received one prior to reoperation (n = 37) had a shorter time to diagnosis (2.4 vs. 3.9 days, p = 0.041) and treatment (2.4 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.037) of their complications. This was associated with decreased open surgery (10.8% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.034), gastric resection (0.0% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.022), postoperative morbidity (13.5% vs. 85.7%, p &lt; 0.001), ICU admission (16.2% vs. 85.7%, p &lt; 0.001), and length-of-stay (7.3 vs. 18.3 days, p = 0.009). Furthermore, patients who underwent early reoperations for asymptomatic re-herniation had less complications and superior functional outcomes at one-year follow-up than those who needed surgery for symptomatic recurrences later on. Conclusion Postoperative esophagrams decreases the morbidity associated with early and late reoperations following hiatus hernia repair, and should be considered for routine use.

EP.WE.1048Weight Regain After Sleeve Gastrectomy More Common in Male and Less Common in Super-Obese Patients - Results of an 18-Month Follow-up Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Salman Bodla ◽  
Jenny Abraham ◽  
Neha Shah ◽  
Vinod Menon
Keyword(s):  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Super Obese ◽  
Burn Out ◽  
Single Centre Study ◽  
Male Patients

Abstract Aims Long-term success of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) is undermined by weight regain (WR). Several procedure- and patient-specific factors have been proposed in previous studies. Here we look at 18-month follow-up post-SG to investigate WR and patient-specific variables influencing this. Methods A single-centre study involving retrospective analysis of a prospectively-maintained database. Inclusion criteria: Primary non-revisional SG patients with adequate follow-up data to assess WL/WR trends. Patients were divided into two subgroups based on their %EWL between 6-to-12 and 12-to-18 months: weight regainers (WR) and weight losers/maintainers (WL/M). Results Out of 338 SG cases between 2012-2017, 180 met inclusion criteria of which 18.3% were men and 45% were super-obese. All patients lost weight during first 6 months (mean %EWL 52.3%, P &lt; 0.0001). Between 6-to-12 months, 87.6% patients continued WL with a further mean %EWL of 10.35% (P &lt; 0.0001). Between 12-to-18 months, a drastic deceleration/reversal of WL progress was observed with an average of only 0.76% EWL (P = 0.84), with 42% of patients regaining weight in this period (mean EWG 6.8%). Male patients encountered significantly higher WR rate (OR 3.27, P = 0.003), whereas it was much less frequent in pre-operatively super-obese patients (OR 0.48, P = 0.036). Moreover, there was no difference in the 6-month %EWL between WR and WL/M subgroups (P = 0.62), thus negating the possibility of WL burn-out phenomenon. Conclusions Different rates of WR in men and super-obese patients may indicate underlying behavioural and biological differences. More research is needed to investigate them in detail, having implications for revisional surgery and follow-up support.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document