scholarly journals Cash transfers and the mental health of young people: Evidence from South Africa's child support grant

2022 ◽  
Vol 292 ◽  
pp. 114631
Author(s):  
E.C. Garman ◽  
K. Eyal ◽  
M. Avendano ◽  
S. Evans-Lacko ◽  
C. Lund
2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-204
Author(s):  
Alejandra Álvarez-Iglesias ◽  
Emily Garman ◽  
Crick Lund

The majority of COVID-19 cases in sub-Saharan Africa are found in South Africa, where one third of young people are not in employment, education or training. As the world continues to fight the COVID-19 virus spread, an increasing volume of studies are analysing and trying to predict the consequences of the pandemic on the economy and on physical and mental health. This article describes the economic and psychological impact of COVID-19 in South Africa’s youth specifically, the efforts made to tackle these issues, and the opportunities to integrate mental health into the country’s social protection measures, such as the Child Support Grant.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 834-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanga Zembe-Mkabile ◽  
Rebecca Surender ◽  
David Sanders ◽  
Debra Jackson ◽  
Tanya Doherty

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 100227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flora Hajdu ◽  
Stefan Granlund ◽  
David Neves ◽  
Tessa Hochfeld ◽  
Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. e004661
Author(s):  
Annie Zimmerman ◽  
Emily Garman ◽  
Mauricio Avendano-Pabon ◽  
Ricardo Araya ◽  
Sara Evans-Lacko ◽  
...  

IntroductionAlthough cash transfer programmes are not explicitly designed to improve mental health, by reducing poverty and improving the life chances of children and young people, they may also improve their mental health. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the evidence on the effectiveness of cash transfers to improve the mental health of children and young people in low-income and middle-income countries.MethodsWe searched Pubmed, EBSCOhost, Scientific Electronic Library Online, ISI Web of Science and Social Sciences Citation Index and grey literature (from January 2000 to July 2020) for studies which quantitatively assessed the impact of cash transfers on mental health in young people (aged 0–24 years), using a design that incorporated a control group. We extracted Cohen’s d effects size and used a random-effects model for the meta-analysis on studies that measured depressive symptoms, I2 statistic and assessment of study quality.ResultsWe identified 12 116 articles for screening, of which 12 were included in the systematic review (covering 13 interventions) and seven in the meta-analysis assessing impact on depressive symptoms specifically. There was high heterogeneity (I2=95.2) and a high risk of bias (0.38, 95% CIs: −5.08 to 5.85; p=0.86) across studies. Eleven interventions (85%) showed a significant positive impact of cash transfers on at least one mental health outcome in children and young people. However, no study found a positive effect on all mental health outcomes examined, and the meta-analysis showed no impact of cash transfers on depressive symptoms (0.02, 95% CIs: −0.19 to 0.23; p=0.85).ConclusionCash transfers may have positive effects on some mental health outcomes for young people, with no negative effects identified. However, there is high heterogeneity across studies, with some interventions showing no effects. Our review highlights how the effect of cash transfers may vary by social and economic context, culture, design, conditionality and mental health outcome.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 430-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio d’Agostino ◽  
Margherita Scarlato ◽  
Silvia Napolitano

1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Fishman ◽  
Lonnie E. Mitchell ◽  
Clarissa Wittenberg
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document