5:40126. Minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion with percutaneous instrumentation: a prospective evaluation of two year outcomes in 31 patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. S66
Author(s):  
Mark Grubb ◽  
Maureen Kilrain ◽  
Nancy Fazekas
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Prospective Evaluation ◽  
Percutaneous Instrumentation ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

scholarly journals Paraspinal muscle changes of unilateral multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Sung Yoo ◽  
Sang-Hyuk Min ◽  
Sung-Hyun Yoon ◽  
Chang-Hwan Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Paraspinal Muscle ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion ◽  
Muscle Changes

scholarly journals Integrating robotics into a minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion workflow

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (videosuppl1) ◽  
pp. V4
Author(s):  
Laura A. Snyder
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Robotic Device ◽  
Robotic Technology ◽  
Planning Software ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion ◽  
Improve Patient

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is a well-accepted procedure with good outcomes. Robotics has the potential to augment these outcomes. This video demonstrates and discusses how surgeons can implement the use of a robotic device in an MIS TLIF workflow. The planning software and robotic arm guidance allow the surgeon to use intraoperative CT to guide the placement of pedicle screws in an MIS TLIF with optimal trajectory and decreased radiation. As robotic technology continues to improve, developing safe workflows that integrate robotics with currently well-established techniques should improve patient outcomes.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/rJWOa6XVLW0.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 236-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won-chul Lee ◽  
Jeong-Yoon Park ◽  
Kyung Hyun Kim ◽  
Sung Uk Kuh ◽  
Dong Kyu Chin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

scholarly journals Minimally-Invasive midline posterior interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws compares favorably to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion

Heliyon ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. e02423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles H. Crawford ◽  
Roger K. Owens ◽  
Mladen Djurasovic ◽  
Jeffrey L. Gum ◽  
John R. Dimar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

P50. Disc Space Preparation in Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Technique

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 108S
Author(s):  
Peter Grossi ◽  
Louis Radden ◽  
Pradhan Ashtoush ◽  
Isaacs Robert
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Minimally Invasive Technique ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

scholarly journals Systematic review and meta-analysis of the therapeutic effects of minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion on spondylolisthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Zaifei Chen ◽  
Wenxu Wu ◽  
Huazhang Xiong ◽  
Guodong Li ◽  
Wenbo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Foramen Decompression in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

2014 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 891-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiann-Her Lin ◽  
Yung-Hsiao Chiang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Unilateral Approach ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

Prospective Evaluation of a Low-Dose Radiation Fluoroscopy Protocol for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis M Tumialán ◽  
Justin C Clark ◽  
Laura A Snyder ◽  
Gary Jasmer ◽  
Frederick F Marciano
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Acquisition Time ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Prospective Evaluation ◽  
Low Dose Radiation ◽  
Dose Radiation

Abstract BACKGROUND Recent research on radiation exposure in minimally invasive surgery for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) has led to the development of a low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol, with resulting reductions in fluoroscopy times and radiation exposures. OBJECTIVE To prospectively evaluate a previously reported low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol for MIS TLIF. METHODS A prospective evaluation of the low-dose radiation fluoroscopy protocol for MIS TLIF was performed for 65 consecutive patients. Total fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and operative times were prospectively analyzed for all enrolled patients. RESULTS Sixty-five consecutive patients (43 women; 22 men) who underwent an MIS TLIF were prospectively enrolled in this study of the low-dose fluoroscopy protocol. A total of 260 pedicle screws were placed. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range, 46-82 years). They had a mean operative time of 178.7 minutes (range, 119-247 minutes), a mean fluoroscopic time of 10.43 seconds (range, 5-24 seconds), and a mean radiation dose of 0.295 mGy × m2 (range, 0.092-0.314 mGy × m2). CONCLUSION The combination of low-dose pulsed images and digital spot images in a low-dose protocol decreases fluoroscopy times and radiation doses in patients undergoing MIS TLIF without compromising visualization of the bony anatomy or the safety and efficiency of the procedure. The application of this low-dose protocol uncouples the otherwise linear relationship between fluoroscopy times and radiation dose. This is due primarily to the use of the digital spot technique. Equal emphasis should be placed on radiation dose and acquisition time to optimize this protocol.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document