Thirty-day readmissions following adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 862-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.R. Manoharan ◽  
D.K. Baker ◽  
S.M. Pasara ◽  
B. Ponce ◽  
D. Deinlein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Spinal Deformity Surgery

scholarly journals Impact of Navigation on 30-Day Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110475
Author(s):  
Austen D. Katz ◽  
Jesse Galina ◽  
Junho Song ◽  
Sayyida Hasan ◽  
Dean Perfetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Database Study ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Spinal Deformity Surgery

Study Design Retrospective database study. Objective Navigation has been increasingly used to treat degenerative disease, with positive radiographic and clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events and reoperations, despite increased operative time. However, short-term analysis on treating adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery with navigation is limited, particularly using large nationally represented cohorts. This is the first large-scale database study to compare 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and value-per-operative time for navigated and conventional ASD surgery. Methods Adults were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Multivariate regression was used to compare outcomes between navigated and conventional surgery and to control for predictors and baseline differences. Results 3190 ASD patients were included. Navigated and conventional patients were similar. Navigated cases had greater operative time (405 vs 320 min) and mean RVUs per case (81.3 vs 69.7), and had more supplementary pelvic fixations (26.1 vs 13.4%) and osteotomies (50.3 vs 27.7%) ( P <.001). In univariate analysis, navigation had greater reoperation (9.9 vs 5.2%, P = .011), morbidity (57.8 vs 46.8%, P = .007), and transfusion (52.2 vs 41.8%, P = .010) rates. Readmission was similar (11.9 vs 8.4%). In multivariate analysis, navigation predicted reoperation (OR = 1.792, P = .048), but no longer predicted morbidity or transfusion. Most reoperations were infectious and hardware-related. Conclusions Despite controlling for patient-related and procedural factors, navigation independently predicted a 79% increased odds of reoperation but did not predict morbidity or transfusion. Readmission was similar between groups. This is explained, in part, by greater operative time and transfusion, which are risk factors for infection. Reoperation most frequently occurred for wound- and hardware-related reasons, suggesting navigation carries an increased risk of infectious-related events beyond increased operative time.

Upper Extremity Free Flap Transfers: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Beyer ◽  
Karan Dua ◽  
Neil V. Shah ◽  
Joseph P. Scollan ◽  
Jared M. Newman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Flap Transfer ◽  
Free Flap Transfer ◽  
Reoperation Rates

Abstract Introduction We evaluated the demographics, flap types, and 30-day complication, readmission, and reoperation rates for upper extremity free flap transfers within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Materials and Methods Upper extremity free flap transfer patients in the NSQIP from 2008 to 2016 were identified. Complications, reoperations, and readmissions were queried. Chi-squared tests evaluated differences in sex, race, and insurance. The types of procedures performed, complication frequencies, reoperation rates, and readmission rates were analyzed. Results One-hundred-eleven patients were selected (mean: 36.8 years). Most common upper extremity free flaps were muscle/myocutaneous (45.9%) and other vascularized bone grafts with microanastomosis (27.9%). Thirty-day complications among all patients included superficial site infections (2.7%), intraoperative transfusions (7.2%), pneumonia (0.9%), and deep venous thrombosis (0.9%). Thirty-day reoperation and readmission rates were 4.5% and 3.6%, respectively. The mean time from discharge to readmission was 12.5 days. Conclusion Upper extremity free flap transfers could be performed with a low rate of 30-day complications, reoperations, and readmissions.

scholarly journals Surgical site infection metrics: Dissecting the differences between the National Health and Safety Network and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaia M. M. Christensen ◽  
Karen Dowler ◽  
Shira Doron
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Surveillance Systems ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with readmissions, reoperations, increased cost of care, and overall morbidity and mortality risk. The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) have developed an array of metrics to monitor hospital-acquired complications. The only metric collected by both is SSI, but performance as benchmarked against peer hospitals is often discordant between the 2 systems. In this commentary, we outline the differences between these 2 surveillance systems as they relate to this potential for discordance.

Economic impact of the use of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvine Fansi ◽  
Angela Ly ◽  
Julie Mayrand ◽  
Maggy Wassef ◽  
Aldanie Rho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Economic Impact ◽  
Quality Improvement Program ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
The Cost

Objectives The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP®) is a validated, risk-adjusted database for improving the quality and security of surgical care. ACS NSQIP can help participating hospitals target areas that need improvement. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature analyzing the economic impact of using NSQIP. This paper also provides an estimation of annual cost savings following the implementation of NSQIP and quality improvement (QI) activities in two hospitals in Quebec. Methods In June 2018, we searched in seven databases, including PubMed, Embase, and NHSEED for economic evaluations based on NSQIP data. Contextual NSQIP databases from two hospitals were collected and analyzed. A cost analysis was conducted from the hospital care perspective, comparing complication costs before and after 1 year of the implementation of NSQIP and QI activities. The number and the cost of complications are measured. Costs are presented in 2018 Canadian dollars. Results Out of 1,612 studies, 11 were selected. The level of overall evidence was judged to be of moderate to high quality. In general, data showed that, following the implementation of NSQIP and QI activities, a significant decrease in complications and associated costs was observed, which improved with time. In the cost analysis of contextual data, the reduction in complication costs outweighed the cost of implementing NSQIP. However, this cost analysis did not take into account the costs of QI activities. Conclusions NSQIP improves complication rates and associated costs when QI activities are implemented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document