110. Feasibility of achieving planned surgical margins in primary spine tumor: a PTRON study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S54
Author(s):  
Charlotte Dandurand ◽  
Charles G. Fisher ◽  
Laurence D. Rhines ◽  
Stefano Boriani ◽  
Raphaële Charest-Morin ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. E16
Author(s):  
Charlotte Dandurand ◽  
Charles G. Fisher ◽  
Laurence D. Rhines ◽  
Stefano Boriani ◽  
Raphaële Charest-Morin ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Oncological resection of primary spine tumors is associated with lower recurrence rates. However, even in the most experienced hands, the execution of a meticulously drafted plan sometimes fails. The objectives of this study were to determine how successful surgical teams are at achieving planned surgical margins and how successful surgeons are in intraoperatively assessing tumor margins. The secondary objective was to identify factors associated with successful execution of planned resection. METHODS The Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON) is a multicenter international prospective registry for the management of primary tumors of the spine. Using this registry, the authors compared 1) the planned surgical margin and 2) the intraoperative assessment of the margin by the surgeon with the postoperative assessment of the margin by the pathologist. Univariate analysis was used to assess whether factors such as histology, size, location, previous radiotherapy, and revision surgery were associated with successful execution of the planned margins. RESULTS Three hundred patients were included. The surgical plan was successfully achieved in 224 (74.7%) patients. The surgeon correctly assessed the intraoperative margins, as reported in the final assessment by the pathologist, in 239 (79.7%) patients. On univariate analysis, no factor had a statistically significant influence on successful achievement of planned margins. CONCLUSIONS In high-volume cancer centers around the world, planned surgical margins can be achieved in approximately 75% of cases. The morbidity of the proposed intervention must be balanced with the expected success rate in order to optimize patient management and surgical decision-making.


Author(s):  
Ozan Ganiüsmen ◽  
Güven Çıtak ◽  
Hakan Korkmaz ◽  
Ali Samancıoğlu ◽  
Füsün Demirçivi Özer

1999 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1056-1060
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Takamiya ◽  
Kensei Nagata ◽  
Horoshi Goto ◽  
Kyousuke Sonoda ◽  
Hiroki Imoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seil Sohn ◽  
Jinhee Kim ◽  
Chun Kee Chung ◽  
Na-Rye Lee ◽  
Eunjung Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this nationwide study was to describe the incidence and health care utilization of adult Korean patients with primary malignant, primary nonmalignant, and metastatic spine tumors between 2009 and 2012. Methods Patients with primary and metastatic spine tumors were identified from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012. Demographics, incidence rate, annual medical cost, and annual hospital stay of each new patient were reviewed. Results Of 1600 primary spine tumors diagnosed from 2009 to 2012, 373 (23.3%) were malignant, and 1227 (76.7%) were nonmalignant. The most common tumor type was neoplasm of spinal cord among primary malignant (C72.0, 51.5%) and primary nonmalignant (D33.4, 66.2%) spine tumors. Differences in primary malignant, primary nonmalignant, and metastatic spine tumor incidence by sex were significant (P = .004, <.001, and <.001, respectively). The annual incidence rate of primary nonmalignant and metastatic spine tumors increased significantly over the study period (P = .005 and <.001, respectively). Lung, liver/biliary, and breast were the most prevalent original tumor sites for metastatic spine tumors. In 2011, average annual medical costs associated with treatment of primary malignant, primary nonmalignant, and metastatic tumors were US $15 223, $6502, and $16 038, respectively. Average annual hospital stay durations for primary malignant, primary nonmalignant, and metastatic spine tumors in 2011 were 103.4, 61.7, and 79.6 days, respectively. Conclusions This is the first nationwide analysis of spine tumors, including metastatic spine tumors, in Asia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seil Sohn ◽  
Jinhee Kim ◽  
Chun Kee Chung ◽  
Na Rae Lee ◽  
Moon Jun Sohn ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Ando ◽  
Kazuyoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Masaaki Machino ◽  
Kyotaro Ota ◽  
Masayoshi Morozumi ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 270-270
Author(s):  
Robert A. Linden ◽  
Adeep Thumar ◽  
Danny Haddad ◽  
Steve N. Dong ◽  
Leonard G. Gomella ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 158-158
Author(s):  
Stephana Larre ◽  
Laurent Salomon ◽  
Alexandre De La Taille ◽  
Yves Allory ◽  
Andras Hoznek ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
David I. Lee ◽  
Justin T. Lee ◽  
David Shepherd ◽  
Harrison M. Abrahams

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document