scholarly journals The contribution of three dimensions of allostatic load to racial/ethnic disparities in poor/fair self-rated health

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis R. Santos-Lozada ◽  
Jonathan Daw
2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-368
Author(s):  
Wade T. Roberts ◽  
Lisa M. Martinez ◽  
Sophie Kauffman

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1376-1386
Author(s):  
Tetyana P. Shippee ◽  
Yinfei Duan ◽  
Mary Olsen Baker ◽  
Julie Angert

Objectives: This study examines racial/ethnic differences in self-rated health (SRH) and sense of control among older adults receiving publicly funded home- and community-based services (HCBS) and tests the mediating role of functional, emotional, and financial stressors. Methods: Data are from 2015 National Core Indicators—Aging and Disability Survey collected from face-to-face interviews with 1936 older adults aged 65 years or older receiving HCBS in Minnesota. Path analysis based on logistic regression was used. Results: Racial/ethnic minority HCBS users had lower SRH and sense of control than white participants, with Asian participants reporting the lowest scores. Whereas functional impairment was a common explanatory factor for the racial/ethnic differences, negative mood and financial strain were mediators for Asian and Hispanic/Latino participants, respectively. Discussion: Racial/ethnic disparities in well-being exist among older HCBS users, with different mediators at play. Customized services are needed to meet diverse needs of older adults of different racial/ethnic groups.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 189-201
Author(s):  
Uchechi A. Mitchell ◽  
Elinam D. Dellor ◽  
Mienah Z. Sharif ◽  
Lauren L. Brown ◽  
Jacqueline M. Torres ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (6) ◽  
pp. 810-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa N. Borrell ◽  
Florence J. Dallo ◽  
Norma Nguyen

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Liang ◽  
X. Xu ◽  
A. R. Quinones ◽  
J. M. Bennett ◽  
W. Ye

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1489-P
Author(s):  
SHARON SHAYDAH ◽  
GIUSEPPINA IMPERATORE ◽  
CARLA MERCADO ◽  
KAI M. BULLARD ◽  
STEPHEN R. BENOIT

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert J. Farias ◽  
Xianglin L. Du

Purpose Previous studies suggest that adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for patients with breast cancer is suboptimal, especially among minorities, and is associated with out-of-pocket medication costs. This study aimed to determine whether there are racial/ethnic differences in 1-year adherence to AET and whether out-of-pocket costs explain the racial/ethnic disparities in adherence. Methods This retrospective cohort study used the SEER-Medicare linked database to identify patients ≥ 65 years of age with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer who were enrolled in Medicare Part D from 2007 to 2009. The cohort included non-Hispanic whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians. Out-of-pocket costs for AET medications were standardized for a 30-day supply. Adherence to tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors (AIs), and overall AET (tamoxifen or AIs) was assessed using the medication possession ratio (≥ 80%) during the 12-month period. Results Of 8,688 patients, 3,197 (36.8%) were nonadherent to AET. Out-of-pocket costs for AET medication were associated with lower adjusted odds of adherence for all four cost categories compared with the lowest category of ≤ $2.65 ( P < .01). In the univariable analysis, Hispanics had higher odds of adherence to any AET at initiation (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.57), and blacks had higher odds of adherence to AIs at initiation (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.54) compared with non-Hispanic whites. After adjusting for copayments, poverty status, and comorbidities, the association was no longer significant for Hispanics (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.17) or blacks (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.19). Blacks had significantly lower adjusted odds of adherence than non-Hispanic whites when they initiated AET therapy with tamoxifen (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.93) after adjusting for socioeconomic, clinic, and prognostic factors. Conclusion Racial/ethnic disparities in AET adherence were largely explained by women's differences in socioeconomic status and out-of-pocket medication costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document