Influence of English proficiency on patient-provider communication and shared decision-making

Surgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 163 (6) ◽  
pp. 1220-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anghela Z. Paredes ◽  
Jay J. Idrees ◽  
Eliza W. Beal ◽  
Qinyu Chen ◽  
Emily Cerier ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selena Davis ◽  
Abdul Roudsari ◽  
Rebecca Raworth ◽  
Karen L Courtney ◽  
Lee MacKay

Abstract Objective. This scoping review aims to determine the size and scope of the published literature on shared decision-making (SDM) using personal health record (PHR) technology and to map the literature in terms of system design and outcomes. Materials and Methods. Literature from Medline, Google Scholar, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Engineering Village, and Web of Science (2005–2015) using the search terms “personal health records,” “shared decision making,” “patient-provider communication,” “decision aid,” and “decision support” was included. Articles (n = 38) addressed the efficacy or effectiveness of PHRs for SDM in engaging patients in self-care and decision-making or ways patients can be supported in SDM via PHR. Results. Analysis resulted in an integrated SDM-PHR conceptual framework. An increased interest in SDM via PHR is apparent, with 55% of articles published within last 3 years. Sixty percent of the literature originates from the United States. Twenty-six articles address a particular clinical condition, with 10 focused on diabetes, and one-third offer empirical evidence of patient outcomes. The tethered and standalone PHR architectural types were most studied, while the interconnected PHR type was the focus of more recently published methodological approaches and discussion articles. Discussion. The study reveals a scarcity of rigorous research on SDM via PHR. Research has focused on one or a few of the SDM elements and not on the intended complete process. Conclusion. Just as PHR technology designed on an interconnected architecture has the potential to facilitate SDM, integrating the SDM process into PHR technology has the potential to drive PHR value.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berit Seljelid ◽  
Cecilie Varsi ◽  
Lise Solberg Nes ◽  
Kristin Astrid Øystese ◽  
Elin Børøsund

BACKGROUND Living with a chronic health condition is demanding and comes with symptoms that may negatively affect health related quality of life (HRQoL). Management of chronic conditions often requires communication and interaction with health care providers (HCP), and good communication can improve symptom management as well as HRQoL. However, experiences of poor communication and interaction between patients and HCPs are common. Digital patient-provider communication interventions carry the potential to facilitate shared decision making (SDM) through improved communication and interaction. The InvolveMe intervention was therefore designed to provide patients with the opportunity to communicate symptoms and informational needs, and to prioritize preferences for care prior to outpatient visits at the hospital, as well as to interact with HCPs through secure messages in-between outpatient visits. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess feasibility of the InvolveMe intervention (ie, use of a digital assessment prior to hospital visits and use of secure messages in-between visits) by investigating system acceptability and demand (ie, system use), explore potential impact on patient reported outcome measures, and use study findings to tailor the intervention and study routines to prepare for future implementation in a clinical trial. METHODS The study was designed as a pre-post feasibility study. Patients from one outpatient clinic were invited to use the InvolveMe intervention for 3 months. Feasibility was tested by exploring: (1) acceptability; data collected from non-participants and participants during recruitment, and the System Usability Scale (SUS), (2) demand; exploration of system use through extraction of system log data, (3) limited efficacy testing; exploration of potential effects from the Short-Form Health Survey (RAND 36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Health Literacy Questionnaire, and (4) implementation preparation; using collected data to tailor the intervention and study routines. RESULTS Participants (N=23) were median 54 (range 26-78) years old and primarily male (61%, 14/23). All participants completed outcome measures at baseline, and 19 completed outcome measures at 3 months. Average SUS score was 72.2, indicating good system usability. Eight participants completed assessments from home prior to hospital visit. The assessments entailed various bodily symptoms and needs for information. Participants sent 17 secure messages related to patient administrative matters, symptoms and challenges. Preliminary outcome measure findings at 3 months were mixed. Results contributed to ideas for tailoring of the InvolveMe intervention as well as tailoring of study routines. CONCLUSIONS Findings allowed establishing feasibility for the InvolveMe intervention and informed intervention tailoring in preparation of a future clinical trial. Given that participants used the secure assessment and messages to communicate about bodily symptoms, needs for information and challenges experienced, use of InvolveMe may have the potential to facilitate SDM through enhancing accessibility, information exchange and strengthen patient-HCP relationship for patients living with chronic health conditions. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT NCT04218721


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. F. M. Stalmeier ◽  
M. S. Roosmalen ◽  
L. C. G. Josette Verhoef ◽  
E. H. M. Hoekstra-Weebers ◽  
J. C. Oosterwijk ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley M. Glynn ◽  
Lisa Dixon ◽  
Amy Cohen ◽  
Amy Drapalski ◽  
Deborah Medoff ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document