Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection surgery: Short-term outcomes and complications: A retrospective comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tang Bo ◽  
Li Chuan ◽  
Liu Hongchang ◽  
Zhang Chao ◽  
Luo Huaxing ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 4085-4091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Valverde ◽  
Nicolas Goasguen ◽  
Olivier Oberlin ◽  
Magali Svrcek ◽  
Jean-François Fléjou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Wen ◽  
Jian Shen ◽  
Qiushi Huang ◽  
Shan He

Abstract Background: Laparoscopic rectal resection may cause various surgical complications including perineal hernia and adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction (PPR) could prevent those complications. The aim of the study is to evaluate the short-term clinical, technical and safety outcomes of PPR using the barbed suture in laparoscopic rectal resection. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in Chengdu second’s people hospital. Between January 2014 and December 2019, a total of 402 patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer in Chengdu Second People’s Hospital were enrolled in the study. Among them, 216 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal resection with PPR were allocated into the experimental group, and 186 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal resection without PPR were allocated into control group. All the patients received standard preoperative and postoperative treatments. Observational indicators (1) surgical and postoperative conditions; (2) postoperative pathological examination. (3) postoperative complications. The data were represented by X ± s. t-test and X2 test were used for counting data. Results (1) Surgery condition: all patients in the two groups underwent successful surgery without conversion to open surgery. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of surgical approach, resection margin, tumor size, postoperative T-stage, postoperative N-stage, positive lymph nodes, harvest lymph nodes, perineal wound infection, perineal hernia, postoperative pneumonia, postoperative hemorrhage, presacral fluid, or abscess. The operative time, blood loss, the incidence of anastomotic leakage, and small-bowel obstruction showed a significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion We hypothesized that pelvic peritoneum reconstruction with barbed suture could improve the efficiency of intracorporeal closure of the pelvic cavity after in laparoscopic rectal resection, which can significantly reduce postoperative perineal-related complications. Further, we expect that use of the barbed sutures will reduce intra-operative stress on the endoscopic surgeon.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1279-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Rottoli ◽  
Stefano Bona ◽  
Riccardo Rosati ◽  
Ugo Elmore ◽  
Paolo P. Bianchi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document