Pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: The experience of a tertiary center from Greece

2022 ◽  
pp. 101702
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Haidopoulos ◽  
Vasilios Pergialiotis ◽  
Kyveli Aggelou ◽  
Nikolaos Thomakos ◽  
Nikolaos Alexakis ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 402-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Matsuo ◽  
Shinya Matsuzaki ◽  
Rachel S. Mandelbaum ◽  
Kazuhide Matsushima ◽  
Maximilian Klar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1316-1326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolò Bizzarri ◽  
Vito Chiantera ◽  
Alfredo Ercoli ◽  
Anna Fagotti ◽  
Lucia Tortorella ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. e109-e110
Author(s):  
V. Andikyan ◽  
F. Khoury-Collado ◽  
E. Hobeika ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
N. Abu-Rustum ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaagn Andikyan ◽  
Fady Khoury-Collado ◽  
Samith Sandadi ◽  
William P. Tew ◽  
Roisin E. O’Cearbhaill ◽  
...  

ObjectiveIt is well documented that recurrence after pelvic exenteration remains high (up to 50%), and patients may require a prolonged period of recuperation following this aggressive surgery. We conducted a retrospective review to evaluate the feasibility of administering adjuvant chemotherapy after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of patients with any gynecologic cancer who underwent exenterative surgery between January 2005 and February 2011 at our institution. Patients were referred for postexenteration adjuvant chemotherapy based on surgeon’s discretion and/or presence of high-risk features: positive margins, positive lymph nodes, and/or lymphovascular space invasion. Suitability for chemotherapy was assessed by a gynecologic medical oncologist. Regimens consisted of 4 to 6 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-related toxicities were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.ResultsWe identified 42 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration during the study period. Eleven (26%) were referred for adjuvant chemotherapy. Three (27%) of the 11 patients did not receive chemotherapy because of delayed postoperative recovery or physician choice. Seven (88%) of the remaining 8 patients completed all scheduled chemotherapy. Grade 2 toxicities or greater were documented in 6 patients (75%), the most common being neutropenia, neuropathy, and fatigue. Median follow-up time was 25 months (range, 6–56 months). The 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates of the 8 patients who received chemotherapy were 58% (95% confidence interval, 18%–84%) and 54% (95% confidence interval, 13%– 83%), respectively.ConclusionsThe administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible for a select group of patients after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies. Our results need to be interpreted with caution because of the small and heterogeneous cohort of patients included.


2013 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene A. Burger ◽  
Hebert Alberto Vargas ◽  
Olivio F. Donati ◽  
Vaagn Andikyan ◽  
Evis Sala ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matías Jurado ◽  
Juan Luis Alcazar ◽  
Jorge Baixauli ◽  
Jose Luis Hernandez-Lizoain

Objective:To study risk factors for low colorectal anastomotic leak after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.Methods:Data from 60 patients, 32 with ovarian cancer and 28 with nonovarian cancer who underwent pelvic exenteration with colorectal anastomosis (CRA) were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Overall rate of CRA leak was 20%. The CRA leak was associated with type of tumor (3% for the ovarian cancer and 40.8% for the nonovarian cancer,P= 0.004), CRA height (<5 cm vs ≥5 cm, 75% vs 6.3%;P= 0.001), and previous radiotherapy (RT; 53.3% vs 8.9%;P= 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that only previous RT and CRA height were associated with the CRA leak. Rectosigmoid wall involvement (81.8% vs 27%;P= 0.001) and mesorectum infiltration (69.2% vs 21.7%;P= 0.001) were more frequent among patients with ovarian cancer patients.Conclusion:Previous RT and CRA at or less than 5 cm from the anal verge pose a high risk for CRA leak. In these cases, a definitive colostomy should be recommended.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 3037-3043
Author(s):  
EVA KATHARINA EGGER ◽  
HANNA LIESENFELD ◽  
MATTHIAS B. STOPE ◽  
FLORIAN RECKER ◽  
ANNA DÖSER ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth J. Diver ◽  
J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain ◽  
Marcela G. del Carmen

Total pelvic exenteration (PE) is a radical operation, involving en bloc resection of pelvic organs, including reproductive structures, bladder, and rectosigmoid. In gynecologic oncology, it is most commonly indicated for the treatment of advanced primary or locally recurrent cancer. Careful patient selection and counseling are of paramount importance when considering someone for PE. Part of the evaluation process includes comprehensive assessment to exclude unresectable or metastatic disease. PE can be curative for carefully selected patients with gynecologic cancers. Major complications can be seen in as many as 50% of patients undergoing PE, underscoring the need to carefully discuss risks and benefits of this procedure with patients considering exenterative surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document