Determination of organophosphorus pesticides using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with reversed electrode polarity stacking mode—micellar electrokinetic chromatography

Talanta ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phimpha Soisungnoen ◽  
Rodjana Burakham ◽  
Supalax Srijaranai
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (14) ◽  
pp. 5801-5807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinchao Wei ◽  
Jiliang Cao ◽  
Ke Tian ◽  
Yuanjia Hu ◽  
Huanxing Su ◽  
...  

The proposed method offers an ideal solution for the determination of trace pesticides in real samples with complex matrices.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 394-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanling Ma ◽  
Yingying Wen ◽  
Jinhua Li ◽  
Hua Wang ◽  
Yangjun Ding ◽  
...  

AbstractAbstract An efficient method based on dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with micellar electrokinetic chromatography has been developed for determination of three phenoxyacid herbicides (PAs) of 2,4-dichlorophenoxybutyric acid (2,4-DB), dicamba and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), in environmental water samples. The types and volumes of extracting and dispersing solvents, ionic strength, extraction and centrifugation time and centrifugation speed were investigated. Successful separation of the three PAs was achieved within 7 min, by using the background electrolyte solution consisting of 10 mmol L−1 sodium tetraborate, 25 mmol L−1 sodium dodecyl sulfate and 15% (v/v) methanol, at pH 9.75. Excellent analytical performances were attained, such as good linear relationships (R ≥0.9993) between peak area and concentration for each PAs from 10–1000 ng mL−1, limits of detection of 1.56–1.91 ng mL−1, and intra-day precisions at two spiked levels in terms of migration time and peak area within the range of 0.22–0.42% and 3.88–6.39%, respectively. Enrichment factors of 2,4-DB, dicamba and 2,4-D were 180, 151 and 216, respectively. The method recoveries obtained at fortified 20.0, 50.0 and 100.0 ng mL−1 for lake, river and reservoir water samples varied from 67.91 to 119.07% with the relative standard deviation of 1.47–6.89%. Graphical abstract


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document