Scrotal circumference of Australian beef bulls

2014 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 805-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffry Fordyce ◽  
Michael R. McGowan ◽  
Allan Lisle ◽  
Tracy Muller ◽  
Jack Allen ◽  
...  
1987 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 547-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.A. Gipson ◽  
D.W. Vogt ◽  
M.R. Ellersieck ◽  
J.W. Massey

1991 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Mackinnon ◽  
N.J. Corbet ◽  
K. Meyer ◽  
H.M. Burrow ◽  
R.P. Bryan ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1049-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. SHARMA ◽  
R. T. BERG

Relationships of scrotal circumference (SC) with body weight (BW) and backfat thickness (FT) as measured from scanograms were studied. A total of 935 observations on growing multibreed synthetic beef bulls on a postweaning performance test were available from a commercial herd for this study. Significant breed group, period and group × period interaction effects were noted on SC, BW and FT. BW and SC increased significantly during the test in all breed groups, while FT showed no change in three breed groups. Repeatability pooled across groups for SC was estimated as 0.72; 0.66 after adjusting for BW. Significant correlations were noticed between SC and BW within each breed group. Partial correlations between SC and BW at constant FT were not different from gross correlations. Linear regression coefficients of SC on BW were significant in all groups and showed heterogeneity among groups but not between periods within groups. Adjustments of SC for BW should, therefore, be breed group specific. BW alone accounted for considerable variation in SC, from 38 to 76%. Simple correlation coefficients between SC and FT were low and significant in only two groups. A significant but low positive relationship was noted between SC and FT at constant BW in a group fed a high-concentrate diet during the postweaning gain period, but there was no relationship in four other groups. Results indicated that the method of adjusting SC for FT as an indirect way of adjusting for scrotal fat was not satisfactory. Key words: Bulls, scrotal circumference, growth


1984 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 667-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Makarechian ◽  
A. Farid ◽  
R.T. Berg

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 2711-2720 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Pratt ◽  
J. C. Spitzer ◽  
H. W. Webster ◽  
H. D. Hupp ◽  
W. C. Bridges

2019 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio R.O. Menegassi ◽  
Gabriel R. Pereira ◽  
Concepta McManus ◽  
Vanerlei M. Roso ◽  
Carolina Bremm ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 485-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.G. Elmore ◽  
C.J. Bierschwal ◽  
R.S. Youngquist

1992 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
J. W. Wilton ◽  
M. R. McMorris

The fertility of beef bulls which completed performance test in the Ontario Bull Test Program was measured by classification of success as breeders according to surveys of consignors to test, by classification of satisfaction in surveys of users of tested bulls and by measurement of calf crop percentages and birth dates of progeny relative to herdmates in the Ontario Beef Herd Improvement Program. Consignors classified 3.0% of the 2556 bulls with completed information as unsuccessful breeders. Users rated 61.5% of the 411 bulls with information from the participant survey as very satisfactory and 4.5% as very unsatisfactory. The effects of end of test weight, gain index, backfat and scrotal circumference on calf crop percentage (cows calving relative to cows exposed), percent of calves born in the first 3 wk of the calving season, percent of calves born in the first 12 wk and satisfaction score were generally small and nonsignificant as tested within breed for 122 Angus, 451 Charolais, 632 Hereford, 575 Limousin and 501 Simmental bulls. In general, gain on test and end-of-test measurements were not found to have any association with subsequent fertility of bulls tested. There was no evidence that increased scrotal circumferences were associated with increased measures of productive performance nor that increased fatness, within the range included in the Ontario Bull Test Program, decreased reproductive performance. Key words: Fertility, genetic evaluation, scrotal circumference, backfat


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document