Genetic parameters for testosterone response to GnRH stimulation and scrotal circumference in tropical beef bulls

1991 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Mackinnon ◽  
N.J. Corbet ◽  
K. Meyer ◽  
H.M. Burrow ◽  
R.P. Bryan ◽  
...  
1987 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 547-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.A. Gipson ◽  
D.W. Vogt ◽  
M.R. Ellersieck ◽  
J.W. Massey

1982 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1049-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. SHARMA ◽  
R. T. BERG

Relationships of scrotal circumference (SC) with body weight (BW) and backfat thickness (FT) as measured from scanograms were studied. A total of 935 observations on growing multibreed synthetic beef bulls on a postweaning performance test were available from a commercial herd for this study. Significant breed group, period and group × period interaction effects were noted on SC, BW and FT. BW and SC increased significantly during the test in all breed groups, while FT showed no change in three breed groups. Repeatability pooled across groups for SC was estimated as 0.72; 0.66 after adjusting for BW. Significant correlations were noticed between SC and BW within each breed group. Partial correlations between SC and BW at constant FT were not different from gross correlations. Linear regression coefficients of SC on BW were significant in all groups and showed heterogeneity among groups but not between periods within groups. Adjustments of SC for BW should, therefore, be breed group specific. BW alone accounted for considerable variation in SC, from 38 to 76%. Simple correlation coefficients between SC and FT were low and significant in only two groups. A significant but low positive relationship was noted between SC and FT at constant BW in a group fed a high-concentrate diet during the postweaning gain period, but there was no relationship in four other groups. Results indicated that the method of adjusting SC for FT as an indirect way of adjusting for scrotal fat was not satisfactory. Key words: Bulls, scrotal circumference, growth


2014 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 805-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffry Fordyce ◽  
Michael R. McGowan ◽  
Allan Lisle ◽  
Tracy Muller ◽  
Jack Allen ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 667-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Makarechian ◽  
A. Farid ◽  
R.T. Berg

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 2711-2720 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Pratt ◽  
J. C. Spitzer ◽  
H. W. Webster ◽  
H. D. Hupp ◽  
W. C. Bridges

2019 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio R.O. Menegassi ◽  
Gabriel R. Pereira ◽  
Concepta McManus ◽  
Vanerlei M. Roso ◽  
Carolina Bremm ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Crews Jr. ◽  
D. J. Porteous

The objective of the study was to estimate age of dam and age at measurement as adjustment factors for scrotal circumference in Canadian Hereford bulls (n = 9029) and to estimate genetic parameters for scrotal circumference, and birth and yearling weights. Quadratic effects of age at measurement and the interaction of age of dam with age at measurement were not important. Adjustment factors recommended for yearling bulls were 1.02, 0.33, 0.10, and 0.16 cm to adjust scrotal circumference of sons of 2-, 3-, 4-, and ≥ 10-yr-old cows to a mature dam (5 to 9 yr of age) equivalent. The linear partial regression coefficient for age at measurement was 0.036 cm d-1. Genetic parameters were estimated using a multiple trait animal model and REML. The heritability estimate for (age of dam and age at measurement) adjusted scrotal circumference was 0.40 ± 0.03, and heritability estimates were 0.43 ± 0.05, 0.21 ± 0.09, and 0.36 ± 0.03 for direct birth weight, maternal birth weight, and yearling weight, respectively. The genetic correlation of adjusted scrotal circumference with direct birth weight was low (0.15), and was moderate (0.38) with yearling weight, but was near zero (-0.01) with maternal birth weight. Environmental and phenotypic correlations of adjusted scrotal circumference were low with birth weight, and were high with yearling weight. These results indicate that there was a positive association between adjusted scrotal circumference and body weight. Genetic improvement of fertility through the use of adjusted scrotal circumference as an indicator trait would not be expected to be antagonistic to that for body weight. Key words: Beef cattle, fertility, Hereford, scrotal circumference


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document