scholarly journals Achieving research impact in tourism: Modelling and evaluating outcomes from the UKs Research Excellence Framework

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 104072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Phillips ◽  
Stephen J. Page ◽  
Joshua Sebu
2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Marcella ◽  
Hayley Lockerbie ◽  
Lyndsay Bloice ◽  
Caroline Hood ◽  
Flora Barton

Early- and mid-career researchers will shape the future of library and information science (LIS) research and it is crucial they be well placed to engage with the research impact agenda. Their understanding of research impact may influence their capacity to be returned to research excellence framework (REF), the UK’s research quality assessment tool, as well as their ability to access research funding. This article reports the findings of a qualitative study exploring how the research impact agenda is influencing early- and mid-career researcher behaviour. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 early- and mid-career researchers. While enthusiastic about creating lasting impact, participants lack effective institutional support to maximise their own research impact. Participants demonstrate uncertainty about what REF impact is. The authors conclude that while there is evidence LIS academics engage with practice to maximise impact, they lack support in building impact and the discipline needs to do more to create opportunities for the academy and the profession to coalesce to identify objects for and deliver impactful research.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e0168533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Terämä ◽  
Melanie Smallman ◽  
Simon J. Lock ◽  
Charlotte Johnson ◽  
Martin Zaltz Austwick

2020 ◽  
pp. 99-114
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Smith ◽  
Justyna Bandola-Gill ◽  
Nasar Meer ◽  
Ellen Stewart ◽  
Richard Watermeyer

This chapter considers how the concept of ‘research impact’ has been developed and articulated with respect to two, potentially very different audiences: policymakers and the broader public. This chapter includes an analysis of recent REF (Research Excellence Framework) and research funder guidance, statements and opportunities relating to these two groups. This chapter also draws on interview data with a range of research funders


2015 ◽  
pp. 12-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Marginson

An analysis of the recent Research Excellence Framework data, released in the UK in late 2014, this article critically evaluated this major program. The REF purports to measure research impact of UK universities and researchers, but often does not adequately measure what is important.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e0172817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Terama ◽  
Melanie Smallman ◽  
Simon J. Lock ◽  
Charlotte Johnson ◽  
Martin Zaltz Austwick

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Wayne Mitchell ◽  
William S Harvey

Despite some research-led teaching relying heavily on an individual’s research, we find very few impact cases studies from the United Kingdom’s research excellence framework 2014 which use this mechanism for impact. This article questions this absence, identifies problems and challenges of ignoring it and suggests recognising students as research translators to create change. Using research excellence framework 2014 as a case, we define research-led teaching and use Boyer’s scholarship of application as our pedagogical base arguing that ignoring this impact pathway is unjustifiable, demotivating and a missed opportunity which underrepresents the impact of management research. The article provokes new thinking on research-led teaching impact for faculty, research managers, universities and international impact assessment organisations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document