Is treating severe He FH so easy? A combined treatment between lipoprotein apheresis and PCSK9 inhibitors

Author(s):  
Beatrice Dal Pino ◽  
Francesco Sbrana ◽  
Federico Bigazzi ◽  
Tiziana Sampietro
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Spitthöver ◽  
Tilmann Röseler ◽  
Ulrich Julius ◽  
Franz Heigl ◽  
Volker J. J. Schettler ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.J.J. Schettler ◽  
J. Ringel ◽  
S. Jacob ◽  
U. Julius ◽  
R. Klingel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (31) ◽  
pp. 3634-3637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Stefanutti ◽  
Maria Grazia Zenti

Background: A combination therapy with PCSK9-inhibitors (PCSK9-I) and lipoprotein-apheresis (LA) may have synergistic effects on circulating lipid and lipoprotein levels, in particular in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemic (HoFH) subjects. The relationships between the above mentioned novel therapeutic approaches as highly effective treatment option for Dyslipidemia in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemic (HeFH) patients deserve further investigation in larger datasets. Objective: This review aims to present the role of lipoprotein apheresis in the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia and discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of its combination with PCSK9 inhibitors. Methods: A comprehensive literature search regarding lipoprotein apheresis in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia and its combination with PCSK9 inhibitors has been performed. Results: LA is also a potent therapeutic player having impact on inflammation and related mediators. A large body of evidence on this is available. On the contrary, only few observations are available on PCSK9-I effects on inflammation. Conclusions: It is quite clear that further investigation on possible direct and/or indirect pleiotropic effects of PCSK9-I on inflammatory molecules is necessary and to be expected. Evidence on both arguments with regard to HoFH and HeFH, are reported in short.


VASA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon Cheon Lee ◽  
Jin Hyun Joh ◽  
Jeong-Hwan Chang ◽  
Hyung-Kee Kim ◽  
Jang Yong Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Endovascular treatment is an alternative first-line management for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Hybrid treatment (HT) is defined as a combined treatment for patients with PAD using endovascular and open surgery, simultaneously performed in an operating room. The results of HT are reportedly good for multilevel revascularization (MR) in patients with chronic limb ischaemia, and even in older high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to examine the clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of HT in patients who need MR. Patients and methods: Nine university hospitals in Korea participated in this multicentre study. A total of 134 patients with multilevel PAD underwent HT and MR. Patients were enrolled from July 2014 to June 2015 and were followed for 18 months. Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.8 ± 9.93 years and 88.1 % were men. Patients with Rutherford category 2 to 3 and 4 to 6 comprised 59.0 % and 42.0 % of the group, respectively. The technical success rate was 100 %. The primary patency rates at 12 and 18 months were 77.6 % and 63.9 %, respectively. The primary-assisted patency rates at 12 and 18 months were both 90.0 %. The pre-operative mean ankle brachial index (0.43 ± 0.23) increased to 0.87 ± 0.23 at six months post-operatively (t-test, p < 0.05). The amputation free survival rate was 97.1 %. Conclusions: Although outcomes of multilevel PAD are reportedly poor when endovascular treatment alone is used, we have shown that HT is a feasible alternative modality for patients with multilevel PAD, with satisfactory amputation-free survival and freedom from re-intervention rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document