Abstract #806387: Real-World Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 166-167
Author(s):  
Mallory Kuchis
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (42) ◽  
pp. 3474-3482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Mahfoud ◽  
Michael Böhm ◽  
Roland Schmieder ◽  
Krzysztof Narkiewicz ◽  
Sebastian Ewen ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Several studies and registries have demonstrated sustained reductions in blood pressure (BP) after renal denervation (RDN). The long-term safety and efficacy after RDN in real-world patients with uncontrolled hypertension, however, remains unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of RDN, including its effects on renal function. Methods and results The Global SYMPLICITY Registry is a prospective, open-label registry conducted at 196 active sites worldwide in hypertensive patients receiving RDN treatment. Among 2237 patients enrolled and treated with the SYMPLICITY Flex catheter, 1742 were eligible for follow-up at 3 years. Baseline office and 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) were 166 ± 25 and 154 ± 18 mmHg, respectively. SBP reduction after RDN was sustained over 3 years, including decreases in both office (−16.5 ± 28.6 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 24-h ambulatory SBP (−8.0 ± 20.0 mmHg; P < 0.001). Twenty-one percent of patients had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Between baseline and 3 years, renal function declined by 7.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 in patients without chronic kidney disease (CKD; eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2; baseline eGFR 87 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m2) and by 3.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 in patients with CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2; baseline eGFR 47 ± 11 mL/min/1.73 m2). No long-term safety concerns were observed following the RDN procedure. Conclusion Long-term data from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry representing the largest available cohort of hypertensive patients receiving RDN in a real-world clinical setting demonstrate both the safety and efficacy of the procedure with significant and sustained office and ambulatory BP reductions out to 3 years.


2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (12) ◽  
pp. 2939-2945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Dimou ◽  
Theodoros Iliakis ◽  
Vasileios Pardalis ◽  
Catherin Bitsani ◽  
Theodoros P. Vassilakopoulos ◽  
...  

AIDS ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 804-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Shalit ◽  
Pat Farrell ◽  
Pamela Lindgren

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Hang Lee ◽  
Adrian Low ◽  
Eric Hong ◽  
Bee-Choo Tai ◽  
Ing-Haan Lim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Adachi ◽  
Masanari Kozawa ◽  
Hajime Yoshisue ◽  
Ki Lee Milligan ◽  
Makoto Nagasaki ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Kimura ◽  
Takeshi Morimoto ◽  
Yutaka Furukawa ◽  
Yoshihisa Nakagawa ◽  
Kazushige Kadota ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e001787
Author(s):  
Kohjiro Ueki ◽  
Yukio Tanizawa ◽  
Jiro Nakamura ◽  
Yuichiro Yamada ◽  
Nobuya Inagaki ◽  
...  

IntroductionGiven an increasing use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the real-world setting, we conducted a prospective observational study (Japan-based Clinical Research Network for Diabetes Registry: J-BRAND Registry) to elucidate the safety and efficacy profile of long-term usage of alogliptin.Research design and methodsWe registered 5969 patients from April 2012 through September 2014, who started receiving alogliptin (group A) or other classes of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs; group B), and were followed for 3 years at 239 sites nationwide. Safety was the primary outcome. Symptomatic hypoglycemia, pancreatitis, skin disorders of non-extrinsic origin, severe infections, and cancer were collected as major adverse events (AEs). Efficacy assessment was the secondary outcome and included changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin and urinary albumin.ResultsOf the registered, 5150 (group A: 3395 and group B: 1755) and 5096 (3358 and 1738) were included for safety and efficacy analysis, respectively. Group A patients mostly (>90%) continued to use alogliptin. In group B, biguanides were the primary agents, while DPP-4 inhibitors were added in up to ~36% of patients. The overall incidence of AEs was similar between the two groups (42.7% vs 42.2%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the incidence of cancer was significantly higher in group A than in group B (7.4% vs 4.8%, p=0.040), while no significant incidence difference was observed in the individual cancer. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the imbalanced patient distribution (more elderly patients in group A than in group B), but not alogliptin usage per se, contributed to cancer development. The incidence of other major AE categories was with no between-group difference. Between-group difference was not detected, either, in the incidence of microvascular and macrovascular complications. HbA1c and fasting glucose decreased significantly at the 0.5-year visit and nearly plateaued thereafter in both groups.ConclusionsAlogliptin as a representative of DPP-4 inhibitors was safe and durably efficacious when used alone or with other OHAs for patients with type 2 diabetes in the real world setting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 2175-2184
Author(s):  
Hye-Sung So ◽  
Min-Gyeong So ◽  
Seo-In Kang ◽  
Jong-Il Park ◽  
Jung-Hee Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document