Impact of rapid maxillary expansion in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients after secondary alveolar bone grafting: review and case report

2012 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. e25-e30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Jie Yang ◽  
Xiao-Gang Pan ◽  
Yu-Fen Qian ◽  
Guo-Ming Wang
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

scholarly journals A CASE REPORT OF ELIMINATION OF ALVEOLAR DEFECTS BY SECONDARY BONE GRAFTING.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charan Teja Vemagiri ◽  
Damera Srikanth ◽  
Chandrababu V ◽  
Siva Ganesh
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Iliac Bone Graft ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Successful Rehabilitation ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

The secondary alveolar bone grafting is an integral component of contemporary rehabilitation of the patients with cleft lip and palate with alveolar defects. Iliac bone graft is frequent secondary graft used in the correction of alveolar defects. There is successful rehabilitation of osseous component post operatively.

scholarly journals A case report of elimination of alveolar cleft defects by secondary bone grafting

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 1591
Author(s):  
Charan Teja Vemagiri ◽  
Srikanth Damera ◽  
V. R. Chandrababu Pamidi ◽  
Siva Ganesh Pampana
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Alveolar Cleft ◽  
Iliac Bone Graft ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Successful Rehabilitation ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

The secondary alveolar bone grafting is an integral component of contemporary rehabilitation of the patients with cleft lip and palate with alveolar defects. Iliac bone graft is frequent secondary graft used in the correction of alveolar defects. There is successful rehabilitation of osseous component post operatively.

Does Early Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting Influence Need for Additional Maxillary Advancement Procedures in Cleft Lip and Palate?

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110427
Author(s):  
Kathlyn K. Powell ◽  
Paul Lewis ◽  
Rae Sesanto ◽  
Peter D. Waite
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treated Patient ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Maxillary Advancement ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Objective To determine if secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) timing in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) influences the future need for additional maxillary advancement procedures, particularly Le Fort I osteotomy with rigid external distraction (RED). Design Retrospective cohort study. Groups were separated by SABG timing: early mixed dentition (ages 68 years) or late mixed dentition (ages 9-11 years). The criterion for RED was negative overjet ≥8 mm, and sufficient dental development for RED. Setting Single tertiary care institution. Patients Patients with CLP that underwent SABG from 2010 to 2015. Exclusion criteria included syndromic conditions, SABG surgery at age >12 years, current age <12 years, and <2 years follow-up. 104 patients were included. Main outcome measures The number of RED candidates and treated patients. Results There was no statistical difference in the number of RED candidates ( P  =  .0718) nor treated patients ( P  =  .2716) based on SABG timing; stratification by laterality was also insignificant. Early SABG is associated with higher odds of being a RED candidate (pooled, unilateral, bilateral) and treated patient (pooled and unilateral); however, there were no statistically significant associations between SABG timing and the number of RED candidates and treated patients as determined by logistic regression models. Conclusion There is no statistically significant association between SABG timing and the odds of being a RED candidate or treated patient. Future prospective studies are recommended to assess the relationship between SABG timing and maxillary growth in patients with CLP.

Radiographic Assessment of Secondary Autogenous Alveolar Bone Grafting in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

1997 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy D. Kindelan ◽  
Robert R. Nashed ◽  
Michael R. Bromige
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Kappa Statistic ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
Point Scale ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Objective To assess if a 4-point, radiographically based scale could be used between operators to reliably assess the success of secondary alveolar bone grafting. Design The study was retrospective with the clinicians blind to patient identity. Radiographs were examined twice by two clinicians with 1 week between assessments. Setting The research was carried out in a hospital-based orthodontic/oral and maxillofacial unit. Patients All patients who had secondary alveolar bone grafting in this unit between February 1992 and March 1995 were included In this study. There were 38 patients with a total of 48 grafted sites. Interventions The bone graft site was radiographed following orthodontic expansion prior to grafting. The radiograph was repeated postoperatively at a mean of 4 months after surgery. Main Outcome Measure The degree of bony fill in the cleft area was assessed using a 4-point scale: Grade 1 >75% bony fill; Grade 2 50–75% bony fill; Grade 3 < 50% bony fill; Grade 4 no complete bony bridge. Results Overall, 50% of grafts achieved grade 1, 23% were grade 2, 22% grade 3, and 5% grade 4. Levels of intra- and inter-observer agreement were highly variable (.33 to .72 kappa statistic). Conclusions The 4-point scale described could be used to assess the success of autogenous secondary alveolar bone grafting. It showed moderate to substantial intra-observer agreement, and fair-to-moderate inter-observer agreement.

scholarly journals Surgical Outcomes of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting and Extensive Gingivoperiosteoplasty Performed at Mixed Dentition Stage in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 576
Author(s):  
Yu-Ying Chu ◽  
Frank Chun-Shin Chang ◽  
Ting-Chen Lu ◽  
Che-Hsiung Lee ◽  
Philip Kuo-Ting Chen
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) is associated with donor site morbidities. We aimed to compare the outcomes of SABG and extensive gingivoperiosteoplasty (EGPP) at the mixed dentition stage. This single-blinded, randomized, prospective trial enrolled 50 consecutive patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate who had residual alveolar bone cleft, of which 44 (19 SABG, 25 EGPP) completed the study. Bone volumes before surgery, 6 months postoperatively, and 1-year postoperatively were compared using computed tomography. The Bergland scale score was recorded at 6 months postoperatively. Both groups had the same preoperative alveolar cleft volume. On the Bergland scale, 21, 3, and 1 patient in the EGPP group and 16, 2, and 1 patient in the SABG group were classified as types I, II, and IV, respectively, which did not show significant difference. With perioperative orthodontic treatment, the 1-year residual bone defect volume in both groups did not show significant difference (SABG 0.12 cm3 vs. EGPP at 0.14 cm3, p > 0.05). The study was not able to reveal much difference between SABG and EGPP combined with perioperative orthodontic treatment.

Evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting outcomes performed after canine eruption in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Coelho Lorenzoni ◽  
Guilherme Janson ◽  
Juliana Cunha Bastos ◽  
Roberta Martinelli Carvalho ◽  
José Carlos Bastos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Rapid Maxillary Expansion after Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Alveolar Cleft

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho ◽  
Elaine Boiani ◽  
Arlete de Oliveira Cavassan ◽  
Milton Santamaria
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Sample Population ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Objective: To test the hypothesis that it is possible to perform rapid maxillary expansion (RME) after alveolar bone grafting in patients with clefts of the lip and palate (CLP) without compromising the final result of the bone graft. Design: Occlusal and periapical radiographs of the grafted area of 17 unilateral and 11 bilateral patients with CLP (n  =  28) were obtained before and after RME. Setting and sample population: Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies (HRAC), University of São Paulo. Twenty-eighty patients with CLP who had undergone RME. Interventions: RME was performed in patients with CLP who had already undergone RME before secondary bone grafting but with relapse of the maxillary dental arch constriction, as well as in patients with CLP who had never undergone expansion before bone grafting. Outcome measure: Qualitative evaluation in occlusal and periapical radiographs after alveolar bone grafting. Results: Findings showed opening of the midpalatal suture in 42.8% of patients in this study. Regardless of the success rate of RME, the alveolar bone grafting was not affected when the procedures were inverted. Conclusion: The hypothesis was accepted. RME can be performed after secondary alveolar bone grafting without affecting it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document