A pregnant mouse model for the vertical transmission of Brucella melitensis

2014 ◽  
Vol 200 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Wang ◽  
S.S. Wang ◽  
G.L. Wang ◽  
T.L. Wu ◽  
Y.L. Lv ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 4048-4057 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Kahl-McDonagh ◽  
T. A. Ficht

ABSTRACT Research for novel Brucella vaccines has focused upon the development of live vaccine strains, which have proven more efficacious than killed or subunit vaccines. In an effort to develop improved vaccines, signature-tagged mutant banks were screened to identify mutants attenuated for survival. Mutants selected from these screens exhibited various degrees of attenuation characterized by the rate of clearance, ranging from a failure to grow in macrophages after 24 h of infection to a failure to persist in the mouse model beyond 8 weeks. Ideal vaccine candidates should be safe to the host, while evoking protective immunity. In the present work, we constructed unmarked deletion mutants of three gene candidates, manBA, virB2, and asp24, in both Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis. The Δasp24 mutants, which persist for extended periods in vivo, are superior to current vaccine strains and to other deletion strains tested in the mouse model against homologous challenge infection after 12, 16, and 20 weeks postvaccination. The Δasp24 mutants also display superior protection compared to ΔmanBA and ΔvirB2 mutants against heterologous challenge in mice. From this study, a direct association between protection against infection and cytokine response was not apparent between all vaccine groups and, therefore, correlates of protective immunity will need to be considered further. A distinct correlation between persistence of the vaccine strain and protection against infection was corroborated.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna S. Jaeger ◽  
Reyes A. Murreita ◽  
Lea R. Goren ◽  
Chelsea M. Crooks ◽  
Ryan V. Moriarty ◽  
...  

AbstractCongenital Zika virus (ZIKV) infection was first linked to birth defects during the American outbreak 1–3. It has been proposed that mutations unique to the Asian/American-genotype explain, at least in part, the ability of Asian/American ZIKV to cause congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) 4,5. Recent studies identified mutations in ZIKV infecting humans that arose coincident with the outbreak in French Polynesia and were stably maintained during subsequent spread to the Americas 5. Here we show that African ZIKV can infect and harm fetuses and that the S139N mutation that has been associated with the American outbreak is not essential for fetal harm. Our findings, in a vertical transmission mouse model, suggest that ZIKV will remain a threat to pregnant women for the foreseeable future, including in Africa, southeast Asia, and the Americas. Additional research is needed to better understand the risks associated with ZIKV infection during pregnancy, both in areas where the virus is newly endemic and where it has been circulating for decades.


2010 ◽  
Vol 144 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 392-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Kerr ◽  
Nicholas Wheelhouse ◽  
Morag Livingstone ◽  
Ian E. Anderson ◽  
Gary Entrican ◽  
...  

Acta Tropica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 198 ◽  
pp. 105094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia A. Bengoa-Luoni ◽  
Mariana G. Corigliano ◽  
Edwin Sánchez-López ◽  
Romina M. Albarracín ◽  
Ariel Legarralde ◽  
...  

mSphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha E. Hensel ◽  
Daniel G. Garcia-Gonzalez ◽  
Sankar P. Chaki ◽  
Airn Hartwig ◽  
Paul W. Gordy ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT As a natural host species for Brucella melitensis, pregnant sheep offer an ideal model to evaluate vaccine candidates for safety. B. melitensis strain Rev. 1 has been used almost exclusively to prevent brucellosis in small ruminants, but it causes abortions when given to pregnant animals. To evaluate the comparative safety of the candidate Brucella melitensis 16MΔvjbR, pregnant sheep (n = 6) were vaccinated subcutaneously with 1 × 1010 CFU/ml of 16MΔvjbR or 1 × 109 CFU/ml Rev. 1 at a highly susceptible stage of gestation (approximately 70 days). 16MΔvjbR resulted in only 1 abortion (1 of 6) compared with 4 of 6 (66.7%) abortions in the Rev. 1 cohort. The placenta was evaluated by culture to determine if vaccination resulted in colonization. As another measure of safety, effects of B. melitensis on the fetus/offspring (vertical transmission) was evaluated by culture and histopathology of fetal tissues to determine if vaccination prevented infection of the fetus. Vaccination with 16MΔvjbR resulted in less vertical transmission than Rev. 1. To determine if vaccination was efficacious and could reduce tissue colonization in sheep, the same cohort of sheep were challenged 5 weeks postpartum by conjunctival inoculation with 1 × 107 CFU/ml B. melitensis. Protection was similar between Rev. 1 and 16MΔvjbR, with no statistical difference in colonization in the target organs. Overall, the 16MΔvjbR vaccine was considered safer than Rev. 1 based on a reduced number of abortions and limited infection in the offspring. Future experiments are needed to further refine the vaccine dose to increase the safety margin and to evaluate protection in pregnant ewes. IMPORTANCE Brucellosis is one of the most commonly reported zoonotic disease with a worldwide distribution. Of the 12 Brucella species, Brucella melitensis is considered the most virulent and causes reproductive failure (abortions/stillbirths) in small ruminants, which can spread the disease to other animals or to humans. Vaccination of small ruminants is a key measure used to protect both human and animal health. However, the commercially available live-attenuated vaccine for Brucella melitensis Rev. 1 retains virulence and can cause disease in animals and humans. In order to evaluate the safety and efficacy in sheep, we vaccinated pregnant sheep with 16MΔvjbR. Our results indicate that 16MΔvjbR was safer for use during pregnancy, provided a similar level of protection as Rev. 1, and could be considered an improved candidate for future vaccine trials.


2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 691
Author(s):  
Helen E. Quinn ◽  
Catherine M. D. Miller ◽  
Cheryl Ryce ◽  
Peter A. Windsor ◽  
John T. Ellis

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen E. Quinn ◽  
Catherine M. D. Miller ◽  
Cheryl Ryce ◽  
Peter A. Windsor ◽  
John T. Ellis

2018 ◽  
Vol 218 (1) ◽  
pp. S21-S22
Author(s):  
Daniela Menichini ◽  
Mesk Alrais ◽  
Esther H. Tamayo ◽  
Chen Liu ◽  
Sean C. Blackwell ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 1017-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. C. López-Pérez ◽  
E. Collantes-Fernández ◽  
S. Rojo-Montejo ◽  
V. Navarro-Lozano ◽  
V. Risco-Castillo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document