A Novel Approach to Penile Augmentation Urethroplasty Using Buccal Mucosa and Amniotic Membrane: A Pilot Study in a Rabbit Model

Urology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 210-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Güneş ◽  
Muammer Altok ◽  
Alime Güneş ◽  
Mehmet Umul ◽  
Zafer Özyıldız ◽  
...  
Urology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 240-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Güneş ◽  
Muammer Altok ◽  
Özlem Özmen ◽  
Mehmet Umul ◽  
Alime Güneş ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 822-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Güneş ◽  
Mehmet Umul ◽  
Alime Güneş ◽  
Muammer Altok

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 711
Author(s):  
Assaf Moore ◽  
Marc J. Kindler ◽  
Aaron Max Allen

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a deadly disease and radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in its management. Recent developments in technique have made it is possible to deliver RT to MPM in the intact lung. However, it is imperative to reduce normal lung doses. We present a pilot study examining the use of CPAP and VMAT radiotherapy to reduce toxicity when treating MPM, involving three consecutive patients with MPM, not amenable to surgery, who were treated according to Helsinki committee approval. Patients were simulated using four-dimentional CT simulation with the assistance of CPAP lung inflation, then were treated using both IMRT and VMAT techniques. Radiation lung dose was optimized based on accepted lung dose constraints. Patients were followed for toxicity as well as local control and survival. Results: Three patients were treated with CPAP-based IMRT treatment. These patients tolerated the treatment and DVH constraints were able to be met. The comparison plans among the four VMAT arcs and the IMRT static field treatment were able to accomplish the treatment planning objectives without significant advantages with either technique. The treatment combined with CPAP reduced the normal lung dose in MPM patients with intact lungs. This technique is worthy of further investigation.


2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir S. Shah ◽  
Darick L. Jacobs ◽  
Alyssa M. Krasinkas ◽  
Emma E. Furth ◽  
Maxim Itkin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
M. Edwards ◽  
C. Rickard ◽  
I. Rapchuk ◽  
A. Corley ◽  
N. Marsh ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 1640-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgardo Diaz-Cervantes ◽  
Antonio De-la-Torre-Bravo ◽  
Stuart Jon Spechler ◽  
Ernesto Torres-Durazo ◽  
Sergio Sobrino-Cossio ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 036010
Author(s):  
Yong-Jian Ma ◽  
Hou-De Zhang ◽  
Chuang-Hong Wu ◽  
Guo-Liang Zhu ◽  
Yong-Qiang Ji ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Nunes Eliezer ◽  
Niro Kasahara ◽  
Cristiano Caixeta-Umbelino ◽  
Renato Kingleufus Pinheiro ◽  
Carmo Mandia Junior ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Mostafa Md Anisuzzaman ◽  
Safiquer Rahman Khan ◽  
Mohammad Tariqul Islam Khan ◽  
Anser Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Md Wahiduzzaman ◽  
...  

Background:Skin act as a protective barrier to prevent the contamination from environment and dehy- dration of tissue. After any surgery to the oral cavity, wound closure or reconstruction is mandatory which is done by skin graft and skin substitute like amniotic membrane by the process of epithelializa- tion and tissue regeneration. Amniotic membrane is use as skin substitute in burn, eye and oral cavity as biologic wound dressing.Objective:To evaluate the epithelialization after use of amniotic membrane in mucosal defect of oral cavity as a biologic dressing.Methods:This was a prospective study which included 26 with premalignant lesion in buccal mucosa who under went excision of the lesion from intraoral buccal mucosa between January 14-june 15 and post operative follow up for 4-6 month after the surgical procedure. We used amniotic membrane(am) for dressing of the defects in buccal mucosa of oral cavity under local anesthesia. Efficacy of this procedure was assessed by granulation tissue formation with surface epithelialization on the graft site.Results:The epithelialization evaluated in postoperative period. According to sex 40 males 70% and 30 females age 22-72 years with means age 45.0±10.5 years. After excision of lesion from buccal mucosa amniotic membrane was grafted on the defect. Completeadherence of amniotic membrane in most of the cases.Wound covered by epithelialization was entire wound coverage in 85% and Nearly entire wound coverage in 15% when use amniotic membrane use as a biologic dressing in oral cavity. No allergic reaction occurs in any patients.Conclusion: Amniotic membrane can be useas a skin substitute in buccal mucosa of the oral cavity.Update Dent. Coll. j: 2018; 8 (1): 36-40


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document