Ureteroscopy With Holmium:Yag Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones in Preschool Children: Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Complications and Success

Urology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 162-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Kucukdurmaz ◽  
Erkan Efe ◽  
Tayfun Sahinkanat ◽  
Akın Soner Amasyalı ◽  
Sefa Resim
2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 989-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Binbay ◽  
Abdulkadir Tepeler ◽  
Avinash Singh ◽  
Tolga Akman ◽  
Erdem Tekinaslan ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuncoro Adi ◽  
Ferry Safriadi ◽  
Suwandi Sugandi ◽  
Zulhardi Haroen ◽  
Bambang S Noegroho ◽  
...  

Objective: To assess the efficacy of pulsed holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteral stone therapy. Material and method: Ninety-one patients (70 males and 21 females) with age range 20 – 76 years underwent 93 ureteroscopic procedures for 101 ureteral stones. A preoperative diagnosis was established by ultrasound scanning and intravenous urography. An 8 F rigid Karl-Storz ureteroscope was used for a holmium:YAG laser (OmniPulse MaxTM 80 watt Holmium Laser System Model 1210-VHP, Trimedyne,Inc. Irvine CA, USA) as energy source for laser lithotripsy. The stone localization was mostly at the lower third of the ureter. The mean stone size was 9,6 mm, mean duration of procedure was 48,1 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 2,1 days. Results: The overall stone clearance rate was 95,6% with the best results for stones in the middle third of the ureter (100%). At follow up we noted two patients with residual stones and two patients with a perforation of the ureteral wall. Conclusion: The Holmium:YAG laser is effective for ureteral stone treatment with a high success rate. Special attention and care should be afforded in impacted ureteral stones. 


2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Cimino ◽  
Vincenzo Favilla ◽  
Giorgio I. Russo ◽  
Alberto Saita ◽  
Giuseppe Sortino ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Watterson ◽  
Andrew R. Girvan ◽  
Darren T. Beiko ◽  
Linda Nott ◽  
Timothy A. Wollin ◽  
...  

PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e3483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henglong Hu ◽  
Lu Xu ◽  
Shaogang Wang ◽  
Xiao Yu ◽  
Huan Yang ◽  
...  

Objective To compare the risk of postoperative ureteral stricture formation following retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU) and ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy (URSL) in patients with proximal ureteral stones. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent RPLU or URSL for proximal ureteral stones between April 2011 and May 2015. Patients were allocated into URSL group or RPLU group and the outcomes were compared. Results A total of 201 patients who underwent 209 procedures including 159 URSL and 50 RPLU with a median follow-up of 30 months were included. No significant difference was observed among the two groups in most baseline parameters, while the stone size was significantly larger in the RPLU group (11.37 ± 2.97 vs 14.04 ± 4.38 mm, p = 0.000). Patients in RPLU group had markedly longer operative time (p = 0.000) and longer postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.000). The initial and one-month stone-free rates were significantly higher in the RPLU group (78.6% vs 100%, p = 0.000 and 82.4% vs 100%, p = 0.001, respectively). Patients in the RPLU had a higher complication rate (18.0% vs 9.4%, p = 0.098) and lower ureteral stricture rate (2.5% vs 2.0%, p = 1.000), while the difference was not significant. Further logistic regression model identified RPLU and female sex as independent risk factors for postoperative complication (Odds Ratio[OR] = 3.57, p = 0.035 and OR = 3.57, p = 0.025, respectively); however, URSL was not an independent risk factor for the formation of postoperative ureteral stricture after adjusting confounding variables (OR = 0.90, p = 0.935). Conclusion RPLU and URSL have similar postoperative ureteral stricture formation risks. RPLU can provide significantly higher stone clearance rate, but relates with more postoperative complications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Pishchalnikov* ◽  
William Behnke-Parks ◽  
Daniel Laser ◽  
Marshall Stoller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document