Cardiovascular and gas exchange effects of four levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated cats anesthetized with isoflurane

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. S994-S995
Author(s):  
M. Machado ◽  
J. Soares ◽  
A. Aguiar ◽  
B. Pypendop ◽  
C. Braun ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Gama de Abreu ◽  
André Domingues Quelhas ◽  
Peter Spieth ◽  
Götz Bräuer ◽  
Lilla Knels ◽  
...  

Background It is currently not known whether vaporized perfluorohexane is superior to partial liquid ventilation (PLV) for therapy of acute lung injury. In this study, the authors compared the effects of both therapies in oleic acid-induced lung injury. Methods Lung injury was induced in 30 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs by means of central venous infusion of oleic acid. Animals were assigned to one of the following groups: (1) control or gas ventilation (GV), (2) 2.5% perfluorohexane vapor, (3) 5% perfluorohexane vapor, (4) 10% perfluorohexane vapor, or (5) PLV with perfluorooctane (30 ml/kg). Two hours after randomization, lungs were recruited and positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted to obtain minimal elastance. Ventilation was continued during 4 additional hours, when animals were killed for lung histologic examination. Results Gas exchange and elastance were comparable among vaporized perfluorohexane, PLV, and GV before the open lung approach was used and improved in a similar fashion in all groups after positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted to optimal elastance (P < 0.05). A similar behavior was observed in functional residual capacity (FRC) in animals treated with vaporized perfluorohexane and GV. Lung resistance improved after recruitment (P < 0.05), but values were higher in the 10% perfluorohexane and PLV groups as compared with GV (P < 0.05). Interestingly, positive end-expiratory pressure values required to obtain minimal elastance were lower with 5% perfluorohexane than with PLV and GV (P < 0.05). In addition, diffuse alveolar damage was significantly lower in the 5% and 10% perfluorohexane vapor groups as compared with PLV and GV (P < 0.05). Conclusions Although the use of 5% vaporized perfluorohexane permitted the authors to reduce pressures needed to stabilize the lungs and was associated with better histologic findings than were PLV and GV, none of these perfluorocarbon therapies improved gas exchange or lung mechanics as compared with GV.


2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 867-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Staffieri ◽  
Bernd Driessen ◽  
Valentina De Monte ◽  
Salvatore Grasso ◽  
Antonio Crovace

Author(s):  
Alireza Zeraatchi ◽  
Taraneh Naghibi ◽  
Hamid Kafili ◽  
Somayeh Abdollahi Sabet

Background: Hemodynamic monitoring its early stabilization is very important in critically ill patients. Evaluating the Internal jugular vein diameter during respiratory cycles by the means of Point-of care ultrasound provides an important, easily available and precise index for monitoring hemodynamic status; a new method which is called Internal Jugular Vein Collapsibility Index (IJV-CI). Any events that alters intrathoracic volumes and pressures may affect this index. In this study we investigate the effects of various levels of positive end-expiratory pressure on this index. Methods: Thirty mechanically ventilated patients were studied. We used three different PEEP levels (0, 5 and 10 cmH2o) and point-of-care ultrasound evaluation of IJV (Internal Jugular Vein) diameter to determine the IJV-CI. The analysis were performed using SPSS V.25.0. Results: Patients were included men (76.6%) and women (33.3%). The mean age of patients was 39.65±3.4 for men and 42.71± 9.34 for women. The IJV-CI were 20.71±11.77 and 24.25±11.46 in PEEP=0 and PEEP=10 cmH20 groups respectively. In 5cmH20-PEEP group median and interquartile range were 16.45(14.8). The IJV-CI in three different PEEP levels were not statistically significantly different. Conclusion: According to the finding of this study, we found no evidence of an optimal PEEP level to measure The IJV-CI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document