scholarly journals No effect of feedback, level of processing or stimulus presentation protocol on perceptual learning when easy and difficult trials are interleaved

2020 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 100-117
Author(s):  
Jordi M Asher ◽  
Paul B Hibbard
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyan Wang ◽  
Dongho Kim ◽  
Giorgia Pedroncelli ◽  
Yuka Sasaki ◽  
Takeo Watanabe

AbstractVisual perceptual learning (VPL) is defined as a long-term performance enhancement as a result of visual experiences. A number of studies have demonstrated that reward can evoke VPL. However, the mechanisms of how reward evoke VPL remain unknown. One possible hypothesis is that VPL is obtained through reward related reinforcement processing. If this hypothesis is true, learning can only occur when reward follows the stimulus presentation. Another interpretation is that VPL is acquired through an enhancement of alertness in association with reward. If the alertness hypothesis is true, learning should occur when reward precedes the stimulus presentation. In our study, we tested the plausibility of the two hypotheses by manipulating the order of reward and stimulus presentation. In Experiment 1, we separated participants into two groups. During training, the ‘Before’ group received water reward 400ms prior to the onset of trained orientation stimulus while the ‘After’ group received water reward 400ms subsequent to the onset of trained orientation stimulus. Both groups were trained using the Continuous Flash Suppression paradigm to render the stimulus imperceptible to the participants by the presentation of dynamic noise in the untrained eye. We found training only in the ‘After’ group indicating that reward may evoke learning through reinforcement-like processing. In Experiment 2, we excluded the possibility that alertness may not be sufficient to elicit learning when presented before stimulus. We presented beep sound prior to the onset of stimulus to increase alertness. Our finding demonstrated that alertness is sufficient enough to evoke learning. In conclusion, our study provided evidence that reward can evoke VPL through reinforcement process.


Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 334 (6061) ◽  
pp. 1413-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Shibata ◽  
T. Watanabe ◽  
Y. Sasaki ◽  
M. Kawato

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 282-282
Author(s):  
K. Shibata ◽  
Y. Sasaki ◽  
M. Kawato ◽  
T. Watanabe

Author(s):  
Martin Chavant ◽  
Alexis Hervais-Adelman ◽  
Olivier Macherey

Purpose An increasing number of individuals with residual or even normal contralateral hearing are being considered for cochlear implantation. It remains unknown whether the presence of contralateral hearing is beneficial or detrimental to their perceptual learning of cochlear implant (CI)–processed speech. The aim of this experiment was to provide a first insight into this question using acoustic simulations of CI processing. Method Sixty normal-hearing listeners took part in an auditory perceptual learning experiment. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of three groups of 20 referred to as NORMAL, LOWPASS, and NOTHING. The experiment consisted of two test phases separated by a training phase. In the test phases, all subjects were tested on recognition of monosyllabic words passed through a six-channel “PSHC” vocoder presented to a single ear. In the training phase, which consisted of listening to a 25-min audio book, all subjects were also presented with the same vocoded speech in one ear but the signal they received in their other ear differed across groups. The NORMAL group was presented with the unprocessed speech signal, the LOWPASS group with a low-pass filtered version of the speech signal, and the NOTHING group with no sound at all. Results The improvement in speech scores following training was significantly smaller for the NORMAL than for the LOWPASS and NOTHING groups. Conclusions This study suggests that the presentation of normal speech in the contralateral ear reduces or slows down perceptual learning of vocoded speech but that an unintelligible low-pass filtered contralateral signal does not have this effect. Potential implications for the rehabilitation of CI patients with partial or full contralateral hearing are discussed.


Author(s):  
Rachel L. C. Mitchell ◽  
Rachel A. Kingston

It is now accepted that older adults have difficulty recognizing prosodic emotion cues, but it is not clear at what processing stage this ability breaks down. We manipulated the acoustic characteristics of tones in pitch, amplitude, and duration discrimination tasks to assess whether impaired basic auditory perception coexisted with our previously demonstrated age-related prosodic emotion perception impairment. It was found that pitch perception was particularly impaired in older adults, and that it displayed the strongest correlation with prosodic emotion discrimination. We conclude that an important cause of age-related impairment in prosodic emotion comprehension exists at the fundamental sensory level of processing.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatjana A. Nazir ◽  
Avital Deutsch ◽  
Jonathan Grainger ◽  
Ram Frost
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document