Analysis of Outcomes Between Traditional Open versus Mini-Open Approach in Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastasis

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. e467-e474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yamaan S. Saadeh ◽  
Clay M. Elswick ◽  
Jibran A. Fateh ◽  
Brandon W. Smith ◽  
Jacob R. Joseph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Spinal Metastasis ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Open Versus ◽  
Mini Open

Combined Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Treatment of CAM-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler S Watters ◽  
Adam M Kaufman ◽  
John M Solic ◽  
Sandra S Stinnett
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Open Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mini Open

ABSTRACT Purpose Osteochondroplasty of the femoral head-neck junction can improve hip pain and function in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. We report our initial series of patients undergoing surgical treatment for symptomatic CAM type femoroacetabular impingement using a combined arthroscopic and mini-open approach. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review of 20 consecutive patients was performed. Seventeen patients had adequate follow-up for inclusion. Preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics as well as intraoperative findings were obtained from patient records. Postoperative Harris Hip scores and VAS pain scores were recorded at final follow-up. Results At an average of 27.8 months (range 12-48 months), the mean Harris Hip score improved from 64.7 preoperatively to 86.8 (p < 0.001). The mean VAS pain score improved from 4.80 to 1.53 (p = 0.001). Two patients (11.7%) underwent total hip arthroplasty at an average of 15 months postoperatively. Fourteen patients (82%) stated they would have the procedure again. There were no significant complications. Conclusion Surgical treatment of CAM type femoroacetabular impingement using a combined arthroscopic and mini-open anterior hip approach has a low complication rate and improves functional and pain scores at short-term follow-up. Watters TS, Kaufman AM, Solic JM, Stinnett SS, Olson SA. Combined Arthroscopic and Mini-Open Treatment of CAM-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement. The Duke Orthop J 2012;2(1):60-65.

scholarly journals Clinical Study of Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open versus Endoscopic Technique

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Okada ◽  
Osamu Tsubata ◽  
Sadayuki Yasumoto ◽  
Norihiko Toda ◽  
Tadami Matsumoto
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Endoscopic Technique ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Open Versus

scholarly journals Effect of a randomized controlled trial on the surgical treatment of spinal metastasis, 2000 through 2010: A population-based cohort study

Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 901-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Kelly ◽  
Varun R. Kshettry ◽  
Benjamin P. Rosenbaum ◽  
Andreea Seicean ◽  
Robert J. Weil
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Spinal Metastasis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Mini-Open Approach to the Hip

2014 ◽  
pp. 387-391
Author(s):  
Antonia F. Chen ◽  
Patrick O’Toole ◽  
Joshua Minori ◽  
Javad Parvizi
Keyword(s):  
Open Approach ◽  
Mini Open

Comparison of Open and Endoscopic Approaches in the Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma

2020 ◽  
pp. 000348942093958
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Barinsky ◽  
Monica C. Azmy ◽  
Suat Kilic ◽  
Jordon G. Grube ◽  
Soly Baredes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endoscopic Surgery ◽  
Olfactory Neuroblastoma ◽  
Endoscopic Approach ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Open Versus ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

Background: Olfactory neuroblastoma, or esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB), is an uncommon sinonasal malignancy arising from olfactory neuroepithelium that is optimally treated with surgical resection. The objective of this study is to determine preoperative predictors of undergoing open versus endoscopic approach for ENB and to investigate significant postoperative survival outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for cases of ENB histology that were treated surgically from 2010 to 2015. Groups were stratified into open or endoscopic approach cohorts. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modality, and 5-year overall survival were compared between the two groups using Chi-Square analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cases were classified as Kadish stage A, B, C, or D based on the “Collaborative Stage-Extension” codes in NCDB. Results: Of 533 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 276 (51.8%) patients underwent open, and 257 (48.2%) patients underwent endoscopic surgical approaches. Patients undergoing endoscopic surgery were more likely to be Kadish stages A and B and less likely to be stages C and D ( P = .020). Those undergoing endoscopic approach overall had a shorter mean hospital stay postoperatively (3.8 vs. 7.0 days, P < .001). Endoscopic cases had a greater 5-year overall survival (81.9% vs. 75.6%, P = .030); after multivariate regression, there was a trend toward survival benefit to endoscopic surgery that did not reach clinical significance (HR 0.644, [0.392-1.058], P = .083). Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, there is a trend toward increased overall survival with an endoscopic approach in patients undergoing surgery for ENB as compared to an open approach, regardless of Kadish stage. An endoscopic approach is an adequate alternative to an open approach for the surgical treatment of ENB.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document