Navigated 3-Dimensional Intraoperative Ultrasound for Spine Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. e155-e169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Saß ◽  
Miriam Bopp ◽  
Christopher Nimsky ◽  
Barbara Carl
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-470
Author(s):  
Xiaoyao Fan ◽  
Maxwell S Durtschi ◽  
Chen Li ◽  
Linton T Evans ◽  
Songbai Ji ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Image guidance in open spinal surgery is compromised by changes in spinal alignment between preoperative images and surgical positioning. We evaluated registration of stereo-views of the surgical field to compensate for vertebral alignment changes. OBJECTIVE To assess accuracy and efficiency of an optically tracked hand-held stereovision (HHS) system to acquire images of the exposed spine during surgery. METHODS Standard midline posterior approach exposed L1 to L6 in 6 cadaver porcine spines. Fiducial markers were placed on each vertebra as “ground truth” locations. Spines were positioned supine with accentuated lordosis, and preoperative computed tomography (pCT) was acquired. Spines were re-positioned in a neutral prone posture, and locations of fiducials were acquired with a tracked stylus. Intraoperative stereovision (iSV) images were acquired and 3-dimensional (3D) surfaces of the exposed spine were reconstructed. HHS accuracy was assessed in terms of distances between reconstructed fiducial marker locations and their tracked counterparts. Level-wise registrations aligned pCT with iSV to account for changes in spine posture. Accuracy of updated computed tomography (uCT) was assessed using fiducial markers and other landmarks. RESULTS Acquisition time for each image pair was <1 s. Mean reconstruction time was <1 s for each image pair using batch processing, and mean accuracy was 1.2 ± 0.6 mm across 6 cases. Mean errors of uCT were 3.1 ± 0.7 and 2.0 ± 0.5 mm on the dorsal and ventral sides, respectively. CONCLUSION Results suggest that a portable HHS system offers potential to acquire accurate image data from the surgical field to facilitate surgical navigation during open spine surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 213-222
Author(s):  
Bartosz Godlewski( ◽  
Maciej Dominiak

Background. Most cervical spine procedures in patients with degenerative disc disease involve discectomy and remo­val of osteophytes in posterior vertebral body surfaces followed by interbody stabilisation with an interbody implant. Interbody implants are made of a variety of materials, differing in structural design, shape and surface topography. Considering that fusion between the implant and host bone is crucial for long-term positive outcomes, the choice of an appropriate implant is significantly important clinically and continues to be an important area of study. Material and methods. Relevant published studies indexed by Medline were identified via PubMed and reviewed. The findings were combined with the authors’ experiences. The database query was based on keywords related to implants in cervical spine surgery. This article presents the currently most popular types of implants by describing their properties and indicating their strengths and weaknesses as well as differences between different implant types. Results. Currently, the most popular interbody cages in cervical spine surgery are polyetheretherketone (PEEK) im­plants, titanium-coated PEEK implants and titanium implants. Besides the type of material used, the shape and surface structure of an implant appear to be of significant importance for a successful bony fusion. Conclusions. 1. 3D printing and the ability to produce 3-dimensional porous-surfaced implants opens up considerable pro­spects for this technique in the production of modern interbody implants. 2. Implants that facilitate the engagement (interlocking) of greater volumes of bone (e.g. porous implants) offer better implant fixation, with the type of material used being less important.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. E669-E676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Helge Klingler ◽  
Ronen Sircar ◽  
Christian Scheiwe ◽  
Evangelos Kogias ◽  
Marie T. Krüger ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 572-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Perin ◽  
Francesco Ugo Prada ◽  
Michela Moraldo ◽  
Andrea Schiappacasse ◽  
Tommaso Francesco Galbiati ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) is an excellent aid for neurosurgeons to perform better and safer operations thanks to real time, continuous, and high-quality intraoperative visualization. OBJECTIVE To develop an innovative training method to teach how to perform iUS in neurosurgery. METHODS Patients undergoing surgery for different brain or spine lesions were iUS scanned (before opening the dura) in order to arrange a collection of 3-dimensional, US images; this set of data was matched and paired to preoperatively acquired magnetic resonance images in order to create a library of neurosurgical cases to be studied offline for training and rehearsal purposes. This new iUS training approach was preliminarily tested on 14 European neurosurgery residents, who participated at the 2016 European Association of Neurosurgical Societies Training Course (Sofia, Bulgaria). RESULTS USim was developed by Camelot and the Besta NeuroSim Center as a dedicated app that transforms any smartphone into a “virtual US probe,” in order to simulate iUS applied to neurosurgery on a series of anonymized, patient-specific cases of different central nervous system tumors (eg, gliomas, metastases, meningiomas) for education, simulation, and rehearsal purposes. USim proved to be easy to use and allowed residents to quickly learn to handle a US probe and interpret iUS semiotics. CONCLUSION USim could help neurosurgeons learn neurosurgical iUS safely. Furthermore, neurosurgeons could simulate many cases, of different brain/spinal cord tumors, that resemble the specific cases they have to operate on. Finally, the library of cases would be continuously updated, upgraded, and made available to neurosurgeons.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Ganau ◽  
Nikolaos Syrmos ◽  
Allan R. Martin ◽  
Fan Jiang ◽  
Michael G. Fehlings

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 276-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Helge Klingler ◽  
Ronen Sircar ◽  
Christian Scheiwe ◽  
Evangelos Kogias ◽  
Florian Volz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 334-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetoshi Nojiri ◽  
Kei Miyagawa ◽  
Hiroto Yamaguchi ◽  
Masato Koike ◽  
Yoshiyuki Iwase ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVELumbar surgery via a lateral approach is a minimally invasive and highly useful procedure. However, care must be taken to avoid its potentially fatal complications of intestinal and vascular injuries. The object of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of intraoperative ultrasound in improving the safety of lateral lumbar spine surgery.METHODSA transvaginal ultrasound probe was inserted into the operative field, and the intestinal tract, kidney, psoas muscle, and vertebral body were identified using B-mode ultrasound. The aorta, vena cava, common iliac vessels, and lumbar arteries and their associated branches were identified using the color Doppler mode.RESULTSThe study cohort comprised 100 patients who underwent lateral lumbar spine surgery, 92 via a left-sided approach. The intestinal tract and kidney lateral to the psoas muscle on the anatomical approach pathway were visualized in 36 and 26 patients, respectively. A detachment maneuver displaced the intestinal tract and kidneys in an anteroinferior direction, enabling confirmation of the absence of organ tissues above the psoas. In all patients, the major vessels anterior to the vertebral bodies and the lumbar arteries and associated branches in the psoas on the approach path were clearly visualized in the Doppler mode, and their orientation, location, and positional relationship with regard to the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, and psoas were determined.CONCLUSIONSWhen approaching the lateral side of the lumbar spine in the retroperitoneal space, intraoperative ultrasound allows real-time identification of the blood vessels surrounding the lumbar spine, intestinal tract, and kidney in the approach path and improves the safety of surgery without increasing invasiveness.


Author(s):  
Brian Fiani ◽  
Alexander Newhouse ◽  
Alessandra Cathel ◽  
Kasra Sarhadi ◽  
Marisol Soula

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document