Spinal Subdural Haematoma: a rare complication of spinal decompression surgery

Author(s):  
Joseph Reidy ◽  
Ralph Mobbs
1988 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 99-100
Author(s):  
M. Gabl ◽  
H. Kostron

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Samuel ◽  
Avani Vaishnav ◽  
Steven Mcanany ◽  
Sravisht Iyer ◽  
Todd Albert ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION While lumbar spine decompression is a common surgical procedure, acute readmission or reoperation for exacerbation of symptoms is a rare occurrence that has not been extensively studied. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of a national cohort of patients who underwent lumbar spine decompression surgery between 2013 and 2016. Readmission within 30 d postoperatively, due to exacerbation of back pain, leg pain, or neurological deficits were identified. Reoperations within 30 d for revision spinal decompression or fusion were also measured. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to determine preoperative patient and surgical factors associated with 30-d readmissions or reoperations. RESULTS In all 40% patients underwent a laminectomy or bilateral decompression and 62% underwent a foraminotomy or unilateral decompression. A total of 3188 patients (3.9%) were readmitted within 30-d postoperatively due to exacerbation of back pain, leg pain, or neurological deficits. A total of 1967 patients (2.4%) underwent reoperation for revision spinal decompression or fusion within 30-d postoperatively. Revision decompression (OR: 2.0, P = .01), additional levels of foraminotomy/unilateral decompression levels (OR: 1.3, 1.5, and 2.5 for 1, 2, and 3+ levels, P = .05), microscopic laminectomy (OR: 1.5, P = .04), and female sex (odds ratios [OR]: 1.2, P = .01) were associated with increased likelihood for readmission. Revision decompression surgery (OR: 2.0) and additional foraminotomy/unilateral decompression levels (OR: 1.9, 1.8, and 2.3 for 1, 2, and 3 + levels, P = .05) were associated with an increased likelihood of reoperation. CONCLUSION While acute readmission or reoperation for symptom exacerbation after lumbar decompression is a rare occurrence, incidence of exacerbation increases with revision decompression surgery and multilevel foraminotomies/unilateral decompression.


1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico C Vinas ◽  
Paul K King ◽  
Yi Ming Liu ◽  
Robert Johnson ◽  
Fernando G Diaz

2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (8) ◽  
pp. 802-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Gürbüz ◽  
M Orakdöğen ◽  
M Z Berkman ◽  
M O Yüksel

AbstractObjective:To report a case of subdural haematoma occurring as an extremely rare and life-threatening complication of cochlear implantation, and to explore the causative association between intracranial haemorrhage and cochlear implantation surgical techniques. This association has not previously been reviewed in depth.Case report:A three-year-old boy was diagnosed with a large subdural haematoma, one week after cochlear implantation. After emergency evacuation of the haematoma, the patient made an excellent recovery and was discharged from hospital without any neurological deficit.Results:Mechanisms of injury are discussed and the literature reviewed, focusing on the possible causes of intracranial haemorrhage identified after cochlear implantation. Notably, bone drilling had been used in all reported cases, and the probable causative injury had always occurred after such drilling.Conclusion:The issue of bone drilling during cochlear implantation is raised, and alternative methods of implant housing suggested, in order to avoid intracranial haemorrhage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document