Salvage surgery for local control of brain metastases after prior stereotactic radiosurgery: a single-center series

Author(s):  
Daniel D. Cummins ◽  
Ramin A. Morshed ◽  
Miguel M. Chavez ◽  
Lauro N. Avalos ◽  
Vivek Sudhakar ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Diana A. Roth O‘Brien ◽  
Phillip Poppas ◽  
Sydney M. Kaye ◽  
Sean S. Mahase ◽  
Anjile An ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. i175-i175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommy Sheu ◽  
Acsa M Zavala ◽  
Tina M Briere ◽  
Andrew J Bishop ◽  
Mary Frances McAleer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 6086
Author(s):  
Maxime Loo ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Clavier ◽  
Justine Attal Khalifa ◽  
Elisabeth Moyal ◽  
Jonathan Khalifa

For more than two decades, stereotactic radiosurgery has been considered a cornerstone treatment for patients with limited brain metastases. Historically, radiosurgery in a single fraction has been the standard of care but recent technical advances have also enabled the delivery of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for dedicated situations. Only few studies have investigated the efficacy and toxicity profile of different hypofractionated schedules but, to date, the ideal dose and fractionation schedule still remains unknown. Moreover, the linear-quadratic model is being debated regarding high dose per fraction. Recent studies shown the radiation schedule is a critical factor in the immunomodulatory responses. The aim of this literature review was to discuss the dose–effect relation in brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiosurgery accounting for fractionation and technical considerations. Efficacy and toxicity data were analyzed in the light of recent published data. Only retrospective and heterogeneous data were available. We attempted to present the relevant data with caution. A BED10 of 40 to 50 Gy seems associated with a 12-month local control rate >70%. A BED10 of 50 to 60 Gy seems to achieve a 12-month local control rate at least of 80% at 12 months. In the brain metastases radiosurgery series, for single-fraction schedule, a V12 Gy < 5 to 10 cc was associated to 7.1–22.5% radionecrosis rate. For three-fractions schedule, V18 Gy < 26–30 cc, V21 Gy < 21 cc and V23 Gy < 5–7 cc were associated with about 0–14% radionecrosis rate. For five-fractions schedule, V30 Gy < 10–30 cc, V 28.8 Gy < 3–7 cc and V25 Gy < 16 cc were associated with about 2–14% symptomatic radionecrosis rate. There are still no prospective trials comparing radiosurgery to fractionated stereotactic irradiation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i28-i28
Author(s):  
Michael Tjong ◽  
Fabio Moraes ◽  
David Shultz

Abstract PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Melanoma commonly metastasizes to the brain and is radioresistant. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) confers durable local control of brain metastases (BM) while maintaining neurocognitive function. These advantages are increasingly important as survival among these patients improves secondary to advances in systemic therapies. This study investigated the local control (LC), intracranial PFS (iPFS), freedom from radionecrosis (FFRN), and overall survival (OS) among melanoma patients receiving SRS for BM. MATERIALS/METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical outcomes of melanoma patients with brain metastases treated with SRS between October 2008 and January 2017 in a large academic centre. Post-SRS, patients were followed in a multidisciplinary clinic with clinical examination and brain MRI every 3 months. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In total, 97 patients with 283 brain metastases (including 12 surgical cavities) treated with SRS were identified. Median age was 60.5 (24.4–90.7). Median follow-up was 9.6 (2.2–74.7) months after first SRS. Median prescription dose was 21 (10–24) Gy delivered in a single fraction. Thirty (30.9%) patients had WBRT post-SRS, 36 (37.1%) patients had BRAF-positive disease. Per lesion (N=283), 1-year LC and FFRN were 84.4%, and 90.1%, respectively; medians were not achieved for either LC or FFRN. Radionecrosis (RN) occurred in 20 (7.1%) lesions. Per patient (N=97), median OS and iPFS were 16.0 and 5.3 months, respectively; 1-year OS and iPFS rates were 62.0%, and 30.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: SRS resulted in excellent rates of LC, with a low risk of RN. However, most patients developed intracranial progression within 1 year. Further analyses to establish correlates (lesion size, SRS dose, and molecular status) to LC, FFRN, OS, and iPFS will be performed prior to the final presentation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 761-767.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kara D. Romano ◽  
Daniel M. Trifiletti ◽  
Allison Garda ◽  
Zhiyuan Xu ◽  
David Schlesinger ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared H. Gans ◽  
Daniel M.S. Raper ◽  
Ashish H. Shah ◽  
Amade Bregy ◽  
Deborah Heros ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Optimal postoperative management paradigm for brain metastases remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to understand the role of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery after resection of brain metastases. METHODS: We performed a MEDLINE search of the literature to identify series of patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery after surgical resection. Outcomes including overall survival, local control, distant intracranial failure, and salvage therapy use were recorded. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were correlated with outcomes through the use of the Pearson correlation and 2-way Student t test as appropriate. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 629 patients were included. Median survival for all studies was 14 months. Local control was correlated with the median volume treated with radiosurgery (r = −0.766, P &lt; .05) and with the rate of gross total resection (r = .728, P &lt; .03). Mean crude local control was 83%; 1-year local control was 85%. Distant intracranial failure occurred in 49% of cases, and salvage whole-brain radiation therapy was required in 29% of cases. Use of a radiosurgical margin did not lead to increased local control or overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review supports the use of radiosurgery as a safe and effective strategy for adjuvant treatment of brain metastases, particularly when gross total resection has been achieved. With all limitations of comparisons between studies, no increase in local recurrence or decrease in overall survival compared with rates with adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy was found.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document