Food-Effect on (−) – Hydroxycitric Acid Absorption After Oral Administration of Garcinia cambogia Extract Formulation: a Phase I, Randomized, Cross-Over Study

Author(s):  
Alessandro C. Cruz ◽  
Antônio H.S. Pinto ◽  
Carla D.D. Costa ◽  
Lanussy P. Oliveira ◽  
Jerônimo R. Oliveira-Neto ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Milojkovic Kerklaan ◽  
S. Slater ◽  
M. Flynn ◽  
A. Greystoke ◽  
P. O. Witteveen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. NP21-NP26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-kyung Cho ◽  
Yong Seop Han ◽  
Jong Moon Park

Background: Garcinia cambogia contains hydroxycitric acid. Hydroxycitric acid is a potent competitive inhibitor of adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase which is a key enzyme in the synthesis of fatty acids. Hydroxycitric acid also regulates the level of serotonin. In these regards, hydroxycitric acid has been reported to exhibit weight loss activity. Adverse reactions of G. cambogia from numerous clinical studies demonstrated relatively mild reactions. However, there are some complications of G. cambogia reported in the past: acute liver injury, acute hepatitis, and hepatic failure. However, ocular complications of G. cambogia have not been reported yet. Case presentation: A 35-year-old female visited our clinic with decreased vision in the left eye and ocular pain in both eyes for the last 6 days. She also complained of headache, dizziness, and nausea. She had taken G. cambogia extract more than the recommended dose. There was myopic shift with anterior chamber shallowing in both eyes, especially in the left eye. Moreover, swelling and retinal folds of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and macula were observed in both eyes. These ocular complications of G. cambogia extract resolved after discontinuation of the extract and topical and oral steroid treatment. Herein, we report the first case of ocular complications of G. cambogia extract diet pill assessed with optical coherence tomography of optic disk and macula along with dual Scheimpflug analyzer. Conclusion: It is necessary that physicians dealing with obesity advice patients about possible visual disturbance of this extract when taken in overdose so that they can see an ophthalmologist immediately.


1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 2020-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
G G Chabot ◽  
J P Armand ◽  
C Terret ◽  
M de Forni ◽  
D Abigerges ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the bioavailability (F) of etoposide (E;VP-16) after oral administration of the water-soluble prodrug etoposide phosphate (EP;BMY-40481) during a phase I trial in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-nine patients received oral EP (capsules, 50 to 150 mg/m2/d of E equivalent) for 5 days in week 1 (course 1), followed every 3 weeks thereafter by a daily intravenous (i.v.) infusion for 5 days of E (80 mg/m2, 1-hour i.v. infusion; course 2); in three patients, the i.v. E course was given before oral EP. Plasma and urine E pharmacokinetics (high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC]) were performed on the first day of oral EP administration and on the first day of i.v. E. RESULTS Twenty-six of 29 patients completed two courses or more, whereas three patients received only one course due to toxicity. Myelosuppression was dose-dependent and dose-limiting, with grade 4 leukoneutropenia in four of 15 patients at 125 mg/m2 and in five of seven patients at 150 mg/m2. One patient died of meningeal hemorrhage related to grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities were infrequent and/or manageable. No objective response was observed. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) is therefore 150 mg/m2, and the recommended oral dose of EP for phase II trials in this poor-risk patient population is 125 mg/m2. Twenty-six patients had pharmacokinetic data for both oral EP and i.v. E, whereas three had pharmacokinetic data on the i.v. E course only. After oral administration of EP, the pharmacokinetics of E were as follows: mean absorption rate constant (Ka), 1.7 +/- 1.7 h-1 (mean +/- SD); lag time, 0.3 +/- 0.2 hours; time of maximum concentration (t(max)), 1.6 +/- 0.8 hours; and mean half-lives (t1/2), 1.6 +/- 0.2 (first) and 10.3 +/- 5.8 hours (terminal); the increase in the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) of E was proportional to the EP dose. After the 1-hour i.v. infusion of E, maximum concentration (C(max)) was 15 +/- 3 micrograms/mL; mean AUC, 88.0 +/- 22.0 micrograms.h/mL; mean total-body clearance (CL), 0.97 +/- 0.24 L/h/m2 (16.2 mL/min/m2); and mean t1/2, 0.9 +/- 0.6 (first) and 8.1 +/- 4.1 hours (terminal). The 24-hour urinary excretion of E after i.v. E was significantly higher (33%) compared with that of oral EP (17%) (P < .001). Significant correlation was observed between the neutropenia at nadir and the AUC of E after oral EP administration (r = .58, P < .01, sigmoid maximum effect [E(max)] model). The mean F of E after oral administration of EP in 26 patients was 68.0 +/- 17.9% (coefficient of variation [CV], 26.3%; F range, 35.5% to 111.8%). In this study, tumor type, as well as EP dose, did not significantly influence the F in E. There was no difference in F of E, whether oral EP was administered before or after i.v. E. Compared with literature data on oral E, the percent F in E after oral prodrug EP administration was 19% higher at either low ( < or = 100 mg/m2) or high ( > 100 mg/m2) doses. CONCLUSION Similarly to E, the main toxicity of the prodrug EP is dose-dependent leukoneutropenia, which is dose-limiting at the oral MTD of 150 mg/m2/d for 5 days. The recommended oral dose of EP is 125 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks in poor-risk patients. Compared with literature data, oral EP has a 19% higher F value compared with oral E either at low or high doses. This higher F in E from oral prodrug EP appears to be a pharmacologic advantage that could be of potential pharmacodynamic importance for this drug.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document