scholarly journals Differential antiseizure medication sensitivity of the Affective Reactivity Index: A randomized controlled trial in new-onset pediatric focal epilepsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 106687
Author(s):  
David W. Loring ◽  
Kimford J. Meador ◽  
Shlomo Shinnar ◽  
William Davis Gaillard ◽  
James W. Wheless ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kari Bø ◽  
Lene Anette H. Haakstad ◽  
Gøran Paulsen ◽  
Anne Mette Rustaden

Abstract Introduction and hypothesis Urinary incontinence (UI) is common in women who exercise. We aimed to investigate new onset UI in formerly inactive, overweight or obese women (BMI > 25) participating in three different strength training modalities compared with a non-exercising control group. Methods This was a secondary analysis of an assessor blinded randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of 12 weeks of three strength training concepts for women on muscle strength and body composition. None of the programs included pelvic floor muscle training. International Consensus on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) was used to investigate primary outcome; new onset UI, and secondary outcome; ICIQ-UI-SF sum score. Suissa and Shuster’s exact unconditional test was used to analyze difference in new onset UI. Difference in ICIQ-UI-SF sum score is presented as mean with 95% CI. Results At baseline 40 out of 128 (31.2%) participants reported UI. Three out of 27, 2 out of 17, 2 out of 23, and 0 out of 21 women in the three training and control groups respectively had new onset UI. There were no statistically significant differences in new onset UI across the groups or when collapsing new onset UI in the intervention groups compared with the controls (7 out of 67 vs 0 out of 21), p = 0.124. After the intervention the control group reported worse ICIQ-UI-SF sum score than any of the training groups; mean difference − 6.6 (95% CI: −11.9, −1.27), p = 0.012, but there was no difference in change from baseline to 12 weeks between the groups p = 0.145). Conclusions There was no statistically significant change in UI after strength training.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Z Giannopoulou ◽  
Ramona Puff ◽  
Andreas Beyerlein ◽  
Irene von Luettichau ◽  
Heike Boerschmann ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
pp. 1241-1243
Author(s):  
MICHAEL A. S. JEWETT ◽  
CLAIRE BOMBARDIER ◽  
ALEXANDER G. LOGAN ◽  
KONSTANTINOS E. PSIHRAMIS ◽  
TIMOTHY WESLEY-JAMES ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. 1241-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL A.S. JEWETT ◽  
CLAIRE BOMBARDIER ◽  
ALEXANDER G. LOGAN ◽  
KONSTANTINOS E. PSIHRAMIS ◽  
TIMOTHY WESLEY-JAMES ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Guyton ◽  
S. Fazio ◽  
A. J. Adewale ◽  
E. Jensen ◽  
J. E. Tomassini ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (22) ◽  
pp. e2021-e2031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Privitera ◽  
Sheryl R. Haut ◽  
Richard B. Lipton ◽  
James S. McGinley ◽  
Susannah Cornes

ObjectiveUsing electronic diaries as part of a randomized controlled trial of stress reduction for epilepsy, we evaluated factors associated with successful seizure self-prediction.MethodsAdults with medication-resistant focal epilepsy were recruited from 3 centers and randomized to treatment with progressive muscle relaxation or control focused attention. An 8-week baseline was followed by 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. Twice daily, participants rated the likelihood of a seizure in the next 24 hours on a 5-point scale from very unlikely to almost certain, along with mood, premonitory symptoms, stress ratings, and seizure counts. We analyzed the association of mood, premonitory symptoms, stress, and circadian influences on seizure self-prediction.ResultsSixty-four participants completed the trial (3,126 seizures). Diary entry adherence was >82%. Participant self-prediction was associated with seizure occurrence at 6, 12, and 24 hours (p < 0.0001). Odds ratio (OR) of seizure prediction increased systematically with participants’ prediction of seizure likelihood (p < 0.0001, all levels of prediction and all time intervals). For the 12-hour prediction window, median specificity for seizure prediction was 0.94 and negative predictive value 0.94; median sensitivity was 0.10 and positive predictive value 0.13. A subset of 13 participants (20% of sample) met criteria for good predictors (median OR for seizure prediction 5.25). Mood, stress, premonitory symptoms, seizure time, and randomized group were not associated with seizure occurrence.ConclusionIn this prospective study, participants’ prediction of a high probability of seizure was significantly associated with subsequent seizure occurrence within 24 hours. Future studies should focus on understanding factors that drive self-prediction.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT01444183.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document