Analysis of racial disparities in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer care and outcomes in a Tertiary Gynecologic Oncology Referral Center

2011 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Bristow ◽  
Stefanie Ueda ◽  
Melissa A. Gerardi ◽  
Onaopemipo B. Ajiboye ◽  
Okechukwu A. Ibeanu
Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 985-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bunja J. Rungruang ◽  
Austin Miller ◽  
Thomas C. Krivak ◽  
Neil S. Horowitz ◽  
Noah Rodriguez ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (28) ◽  
pp. 3460-3473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexi A. Wright ◽  
Kari Bohlke ◽  
Deborah K. Armstrong ◽  
Michael A. Bookman ◽  
William A. Cliby ◽  
...  

Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction among women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Four phase III clinical trials form the primary evidence base for the recommendations. The published studies suggest that for selected women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction are noninferior to primary cytoreduction and adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to overall and progression-free survival and are associated with less perioperative morbidity and mortality. Recommendations All women with suspected stage IIIC or IV invasive epithelial ovarian cancer should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist prior to initiation of therapy. The primary clinical evaluation should include a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging (CT preferred). Women with a high perioperative risk profile or a low likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm of residual disease (ideally to no visible disease) should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Women who are fit for primary cytoreductive surgery, and with potentially resectable disease, may receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary cytoreductive surgery. However, primary cytoreductive surgery is preferred if there is a high likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm (ideally to no visible disease) with acceptable morbidity. Before neoadjuvant chemotherapy is delivered, all patients should have confirmation of an invasive ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/NACT-ovarian-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .


2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 280-281
Author(s):  
B. Erickson ◽  
J. Martin ◽  
M. Shah ◽  
J. Fauci ◽  
L. Daily ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 390-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeles Alvarez Secord ◽  
Paula S. Lee ◽  
Kathleen M. Darcy ◽  
Laura J. Havrilesky ◽  
Lisa A. Grace ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Winter ◽  
G. Larry Maxwell ◽  
Chunqiao Tian ◽  
Michael J. Sundborg ◽  
G. Scott Rose ◽  
...  

Purpose To identify factors predictive of poor prognosis in a similarly treated population of women with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and Methods A retrospective review of 360 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IV EOC who underwent primary surgery followed by six cycles of intravenous platinum/paclitaxel was performed. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of potential prognostic factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The median PFS and OS for this group of stage IV ovarian cancer patients was 12 and 29 months, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that histology, malignant pleural effusion, intraparenchymal liver metastasis, and residual tumor size were significant prognostic variables. Whereas patients with microscopic residual disease had the best outcome, patients with 0.1 to 1.0 cm residual disease and patients with 1.1 to 5.0 cm residual disease had similar PFS and OS. Patients with a residual size more than 5 cm had a diminished PFS and OS when compared with all other groups. Median OS for microscopic, 0.1 to 5.0 cm, and more than 5.0 cm residual disease was 64, 30, and 19 months, respectively. Conclusion Patients with more than 5 cm residual disease have the shortest PFS and OS, whereas patients with 0.1 to 1.0 and 1.1 to 5.0 cm have similar outcome. These findings suggest that ultraradical cytoreductive procedures might be targeted for selected patients in whom microscopic residual disease is achievable. Patients with less than 5.0 cm of disease initially and significant disease and/or comorbidities precluding microscopic cytoreduction may be considered for alternative therapeutic options other than primary cytoreduction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document