A clinical classification system for platinum hypersensitivity reactions

2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 288
Author(s):  
M.H. Vetter ◽  
A.V. Castaneda ◽  
A. Khan ◽  
D.M. O'Malley
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Clinical Classification

A clinical classification system for grading platinum hypersensitivity reactions

2020 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 794-798
Author(s):  
Monica Hagan Vetter ◽  
Antonio Castaneda ◽  
Ambar Khan ◽  
David M. O'Malley
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Clinical Classification

Classification of patients with a clinically isolated syndrome based on signs and symptoms is supported by magnetic resonance imaging results

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 717-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Nielsen ◽  
B. Moraal ◽  
C.H. Polman ◽  
P. Poppe ◽  
M. de Vos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Clinical Classification ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Symptoms And Signs

Background Recently, a clinical classification system was described to determine whether symptoms and signs of patients presenting with a first episode suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS) indicate the presence of monofocal or multifocal disease. Objectives To evaluate the value of this new classification system by comparing the results with those of simultaneously obtained magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Methods The 487 patients, randomised in the BENEFIT study, were centrally assessed using the new system and classified as monofocal or multifocal, based on clinical information by two neurologists masked for the MRI results. MRI analyses were performed by expert readers masked for the clinical classification. Results Patients classified as multifocal had more T2 hyperintense (median: 21 versus 15.5) and more T1 hypo-intense lesions (median: 2 versus 1) than those classified as monofocal. Patients classified at the local site as having evidence of a single clinical lesion, but reclassified centrally as having a clinical multifocal central nervous system presentation, had more T2 lesions than monofocal patients. In addition, patients with a multifocal presentation more often fulfilled the MRI criteria for dissemination in space, as incorporated in the International Panel (IP) diagnostic criteria for MS. Conclusion These data provide justification for the recently proposed clinical classification system to be used in patients who present with a first episode suggestive of MS, in that `multifocal', based on symptoms and signs, is associated with more lesions on MRI. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 717-721. http://msj.sagepub.com

scholarly journals Evaluation and inter-observer analysis of retinography existing clinical classification system to categorize moderate retinopathies

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
C SANCHEZ RAMOS ◽  
M WASFI ◽  
C BONNIN-ARIAS ◽  
M VINAS-PENA ◽  
A FORLAN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Clinical Classification

Towards a Clinical Classification System for Position-Dependent Obstructive Sleep Apnea

2014 ◽  
pp. 131-135
Author(s):  
Madeline Ravesloot ◽  
Michaël H. Frank ◽  
J. Peter van Maanen ◽  
E. A. Verhagen ◽  
Jan de Lange ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Clinical Classification ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

A new suggested pattern-based clinical classification system for endocervical adenocarcinoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 62-63
Author(s):  
N. Thomakos ◽  
M. Sotiropoulou ◽  
D. Zacharakis ◽  
I. Koutroumpa ◽  
E. Valla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Classification System ◽  
Clinical Classification ◽  
Endocervical Adenocarcinoma
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document