Ulnar Variance: Correlation of Plain Radiographs, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Anatomic Dissection

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 109-111
Author(s):  
S. Kakar
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Ulnar Variance ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Plain Radiographs ◽  
Anatomic Dissection

scholarly journals Imaging Modalities for Evaluation of Intestinal Obstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Nelms ◽  
Brian R. Kann
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Imaging Modalities ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Rectal Surgeon ◽  
Contrast Imaging ◽  
Plain Radiographs

AbstractIt is essential for the colon and rectal surgeon to understand the evaluation and management of patients with both small and large bowel obstructions. Computed tomography is usually the most appropriate and accurate diagnostic imaging modality for most suspected bowel obstructions. Additional commonly used imaging modalities include plain radiographs and contrast imaging/fluoroscopy, while less commonly utilized imaging modalities include ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Regardless of the imaging modality used, interpretation of imaging should involve a systematic, methodological approach to ensure diagnostic accuracy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document