A phylogenetic analysis of the frog genera Vibrissaphora and Leptobrachium, and the correlated evolution of nuptial spine and reversed sexual size dimorphism

2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 695-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuchi Zheng ◽  
Shuqiang Li ◽  
Jinzhong Fu
2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 532-542
Author(s):  
Jonny Schoenjahn ◽  
Chris R Pavey ◽  
Gimme H Walter

Abstract The causes of the reversed sexual size dimorphism (RSD; females larger than males) in birds of prey are subject to a centuries-old, passionate debate. A crucial difficulty is to distinguish whether the postulated benefits derive from the proposed causal process(es) or are incidental. After reviewing the existing literature, we present a methodology that overcomes this difficulty and renders unnecessary any speculative a priori distinctions between evolved function and incidental effects. We can thus justify the following novel version of the well-known nest defence hypothesis as the most likely to explain the phenomenon in all birds of prey that show RSD: if the female predominates in actively defending the eggs and young against predators, then she is the heavier sex, and her relatively greater body mass is adaptive. That is, heavier females are favoured (independently of males) by natural selection. The attractiveness of this hypothesis is that it has the potential to explain the phenomenon in all raptors exhibiting RSD, can deal with the exceptional cases in this group, explains the direction of the dimorphism, focuses on a key factor in the reproductive success of most raptors, is parsimonious, i.e. does not require supporting hypotheses, and is supported by a substantial body of evidence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onolragchaa Ganbold ◽  
Richard P. Reading ◽  
Ganchimeg J. Wingard ◽  
Woon Kee Paek ◽  
Purevsuren Tsolmonjav ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. e01745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Pérez-Camacho ◽  
Sara Martínez-Hesterkamp ◽  
Salvador Rebollo ◽  
Gonzalo García-Salgado ◽  
Ignacio Morales-Castilla

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matjaž Kuntner

The nephilid ‘coin spiders’ (Herennia Thorell) are known for their arboricolous ladder webs, extreme sexual size dimorphism and peculiar sexual biology. This paper revises Herennia taxonomy, systematics, biology and biogeography. The widespread Asian Herennia multipuncta (Doleschall) ( = H. sampitana Karsch, new synonymy; = H. mollis Thorell, new synonymy) is synanthropic and invasive, whereas the other 10 species are narrowly distributed Australasian island endemics: H. agnarssoni, sp. nov. is known from Solomon Islands; H. deelemanae, sp. nov. from northern Borneo; H. etruscilla, sp. nov. from Java; H. gagamba, sp. nov. from the Philippines; H. jernej, sp. nov. from Sumatra; H. milleri, sp. nov. from New Britain; H. oz, sp. nov. from Australia; H. papuana Thorell from New Guinea; H. sonja, sp. nov. from Kalimantan and Sulawesi; and H. tone, sp. nov. from the Philippines. A phylogenetic analysis of seven species of Herennia, six nephilid species and 15 outgroup taxa scored for 190 morphological and behavioural characters resulted in 10 equally parsimonious trees supporting the monophyly of Nephilidae, Herennia, Nephila, Nephilengys and Clitaetra, but the sister-clade to the nephilids is ambiguous. Coin spiders do not fit well established biogeographic lines (Wallace, Huxley) dividing Asian and Australian biotas, but the newly drawn ‘Herennia line’ suggests an all-Australasian speciation in Herennia. To explain the peculiar male sexual behaviour (palpal mutilation and severance) known in Herennia and Nephilengys, three specific hypotheses based on morphological and behavioural data are proposed: (1) broken embolic conductors function as mating plugs; (2) bulb severance following mutilation is advantageous for the male to avoid hemolymph leakage; and (3) the eunuch protects his parental investment by fighting off rival males.


The Auk ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Catry ◽  
Richard A. Phillips ◽  
Robert W. Furness

1997 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1291-1299 ◽  
Author(s):  
DONALD BLOMQVIST ◽  
OLOF C JOHANSSON ◽  
UNO UNGER ◽  
MIKAEL LARSSON ◽  
LARS-ÅKE FLODIN

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document