The dangers of disease transmission by artificial insemination and embryo transfer

1993 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Philpott
2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 161 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Fieni ◽  
C. Grant ◽  
J. Gard-Schnuelle ◽  
G. Perry ◽  
C. Wrenzycki ◽  
...  

Embryo transfer and artificial insemination are utilised nationally and internationally for the introduction, improvement, and preservation of livestock genetics. Embryos present a lower risk of infectious disease transmission than do live animals. In order to maintain the sanitary security and to facilitate the trade of embryos and semen worldwide, the Health and Scientific Advisory Committee of the International Embryo Technology Society designed, developed, and conducted a survey to determine research priority. The survey questionnaire was sent to 32 government representatives and 76 embryo transfer and artificial insemination industry representatives around the world to countries where artificial breeding industries are active and well developed. A total of 16 answers were received, 9/32 (28%) from government representatives and 7/76 (9%) from industry representatives. The global feedback was 15%. The survey indicated that, in terms of research priority, embryos and semen were equally important. With regards to embryo research priorities, the survey results ranked in vitro-produced embryos research as the most important, followed by in vitro-derived embryos, and then oocytes. Apart from scrapie for embryos and Campylobacteriosis for semen, research priorities were similar for the major pathogens of embryos and semen, in particular, bovine viral diarrhoea and paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease; Table 1). Emerging or less common diseases were not forgotten. Other diseases suggested but not listed in Table 1 included bluetongue, foot and mouth disease, lentivirus, arbovirus, bovine tuberculosis, porcine epidemic diarrhoea, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, African swine fever, and ovine pulmonary adenocarcinoma (Jaagsiekte). The survey highlighted the need to focus research largely on ruminant species (Table 1). Other issues identified by the survey included (i) alternative or indirect processes for determining the sanitary quality of in vitro-produced embryo as for in vitro-derived embryos, including standardized testing of discarded oocytes or testing culture media for pathogens with validated PCR techniques, (ii) safe sanitary techniques for the perforation of the zona pellucida for biopsy, for pre-implantation genetics and for diagnostic purposes, (iii) recommendations for international trade in embryos or semen originating from vaccinated donors, and (iv) use of biologicals for disinfecting embryos during washing procedures. Table 1. Answers (%) to the questions: Which pathogens (species) represent the most urgent research need? (answers with results <5% are not listed)


2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
M A HANNAN ◽  
Shingo HANEDA ◽  
Yasuyuki ITAMI ◽  
Sohei WACHI ◽  
Tomoko SAITOH ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
P. J. Broadbent ◽  
D. C. Macdonald ◽  
G. Paterson ◽  
D. F. Dolman ◽  
G. Wilson

The ability to detect oestrus in cattle is important where artificial insemination, superovulation or embryo transfer techniques are being used. Even where oestrus is synchronised or controlled, knowlege of the occurrence of oestrus can increase success rates and reduce costs. A testosterone treated female fitted with a chinball marker (Signoret, 1975; Kiser, Britt and Ritchie, 1977) has been shown to be a useful aid to detection of oestrus. A preliminary experience using such females in conjunction with maiden heifers supported these claims and a subsequent trial provided a more formal evaluation of the technique.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
M. Oliveira ◽  
R. Santos ◽  
R. Chebel ◽  
D. Demetrio

Excessive heat affects the fertility of high production lactating cows, and reduced pregnancy rates (PR) are observed during summer and early fall. Embryo production programs are used to produce more calves from high genetic merit animals, but could it also increase fertility by bypassing all the negative variables affecting the embryo development before Day 7 (oocyte development, ovulation, fertilization, early embryo development)? The data from AIs and embryo transfers (ET) between June 2017 and May 2019 were analysed. June, July, August, September, and October were called critical months (first-service AI conception rate dropped below 44%). The cows were located at Maddox Dairy in Riverdale, CA, USA, a Holstein herd that milks 3500 cows with a 305-day mature-equivalent milk production of 12 800 kg. First- and second-lactation cows were enrolled in a Presynch-Ovsynch oestrus-synchronization program and scheduled for the first AI at 86 days after calving or to receive an embryo 7 or 8 days after the expected heat. The embryos were produced invivo or invitro from Holstein donors and were transferred fresh or frozen. Blood was sampled on Day 30 after expected heat day (23 days after embryo transfer), and pregnancy was detected by the IDEXX PAG Bovine Pregnancy Test. Table 1 summarises the results, where ET PR% is the number of pregnant cows divided by the number of cows that received and embryo. All the cows synchronized for AI were bred, but only cows with the presence of a corpus luteum (CL) on ET day received an embryo. The presence of a CL was not detected in 28.7% (471/1642) of the cows (32.2% in the critical months and 25.7% in the others). Unfortunately, we could not detect the presence of a CL by ultrasonography every time we transferred embryos, so the nonovulation rate might be overestimated. The cows without a CL were considered open and used to calculate the adjusted PR (AdjPR%). Embryo transfer PR is superior to that of AI, especially during the critical months. Fresh invivo embryos have the most impact. When the cows without CLs are considered open, the difference between AI and ET is still evident for fresh invivo embryos. Besides producing animals with higher genetic merit, depending on the type of embryo used, ET can increase fertility in lactating Holstein cows, especially during the critical months. The other benefit of using ET is that cows that do not ovulate are synchronized right away, which is not the case for AI cows. Table 1.AI×embryo transfer in lactating Holstein cows1 from June 2017 to May 20192 Item Critical months (June to October) Other months (November to May) All year %PR n Adj PR% n %PR n Adj PR% n %PR n Adj PR% n Artificial insemination 41.2% 896 41.2% 896 47.7% 1767 47.7% 1767 45.5% 2663 2663 Fresh invivo embryo 62.7% 373 47.5% 493 69.5% 262 55.3% 329 65.5% 635 50.6% 822 Frozen invivo embryo 59.3% 221 44.8% 292 59.4% 256 47.3% 322 59.3% 477 46.1% 614 IVF fresh embryo 47.9% 167 36.2% 221 54.0% 363 43.0% 456 52.1% 530 40.8% 677 Total embryos 58.5% 761 44.2% 1006 60.2% 881 47.9% 1107 59.4% 1642 46.1% 2113 1Lactating Holstein cows, first and second lactation, first service, Presynch-Ovsynch, 85 DIM. 2PR%=the number of pregnant cows divided by the number of cows that received and embryo; AdjPR%=adjusted pregnancy rate.


Author(s):  
C.F.B. SHIPLEY, ◽  
BRIAN C. BUCKRELL, ◽  
M.J.A. MYLNE, ◽  
JOHN POLLARD, ◽  
J.R. HUNTON

1999 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.A. Croy ◽  
J. Prudencio ◽  
K. Minhas ◽  
A.A. Ashkar ◽  
C. Galligan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document