Differences in health related quality of life between men and women undergoing IVF treatment.

2001 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. S197
Author(s):  
I Tur-Kaspa ◽  
Y Maor ◽  
S Meltzer ◽  
S Segal
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathrine O. Normann ◽  
Randi Opheim ◽  
Bettina K. Andreassen ◽  
Tomm Bernklev ◽  
Erik S. Haug

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terianne Cowling ◽  
Linda W. Jennings ◽  
Robert M. Goldstein ◽  
Edmund Q. Sanchez ◽  
Srinath Chinnakotla ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 848-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
GABRIEL GRIZZO CUCATO ◽  
RAPHAEL MENDES RITTI-DIAS ◽  
MAYSA SEABRA CENDOROGLO ◽  
JOSÉ MARIA MALUF DE CARVALHO ◽  
FÁBIO NASRI ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Objective To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQL) indicators between institutionalized and community-dwelling elderly men and women. Method This was a cross-sectional study with a sample of 496 elderly men and women, surveyed by researchers at a private hospital that attends institutionalized and community-dwelling elderly. HRQL (World Health Organization Quality of Life), daily living activities (Katz questionnaire), and instrumental daily living activities (Lawton questionnaire), mini-mental state examination, handgrip strength test, and function capacity (timed up and go test) were obtained. Results Institutionalized men presented higher scores in physical and psychological domains of HRQL compared to elderly men living alone (p<0.05). Among women, the scores in all domains (physical, psychological, relationship, and environment) were similar between institutionalized and community-dwelling individuals. Conclusion Institutionalized elderly men reported better scores in physical and psychological domains of HRQL compared to their community-dwelling pairs, while both institutionalized and community-dwelling elderly women presented similar HRQL.


2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allyson Ion ◽  
Wenjie Cai ◽  
Dawn Elston ◽  
Eleanor Pullenayegum ◽  
Fiona Smaill ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiomi Kobayashi ◽  
Yoji Ogura ◽  
Takahiro Kitagawa ◽  
Yoshiro Yonezawa ◽  
Yohei Takahashi ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective chart audit.Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the gender difference in pre- and postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients who have had decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).Overview of Literature: Gender differences may contribute to variations in disease presentations and health outcomes. The influence of gender on pre- and postoperative HRQOL in spinal disorders remains unclear.Methods: We reviewed 125 patients (79 men and 46 women) who had lumbar spinous process splitting laminectomy (LSPSL) for LSS. We assessed the following clinical information: Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score; numerical rating scale (NRS) for low back pain (LBP), leg pain, and leg numbness; Zurich Claudication Questionnaire; JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; Roland- Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); and Short Form 8 (SF-8) as HRQOL. We compared the HRQOLs of men and women pre- and postoperatively.Results: Although the preoperative NRS results for LBP were significantly higher in women (p <0.05), there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between men and women postoperatively. For HRQOL, the RMDQ scores were significantly worse in women preoperatively (p <0.05), but no significant differences were found postoperatively between men and women. Similarly, the SF-8 mental health score was also significantly lower in women preoperatively (p <0.05), but no significant differences were noted between the two groups postoperatively.Conclusions: LSPSL greatly reduced LBP, leg pain, and leg numbness in both genders. There were limited differences in pain and several HRQOL questionnaire responses between men and women after surgery. We found that women had greater sensitivity to and/or lower tolerance for pain than men, which led to lower HRQOL mental health scores preoperatively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document