384 Low-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus Has a High Risk of Progression When Confirmed by a Panel of Expert Pathologists

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-73-S-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas C. Duits ◽  
Kai Yi N. Phoa ◽  
Wouter L. Curvers ◽  
Fiebo J. ten Kate ◽  
Gerrit A. Meijer ◽  
...  
Endoscopy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 39 (07) ◽  
pp. 581-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lim ◽  
D. Treanor ◽  
M. Dixon ◽  
A. Axon

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Author(s):  
Lisa O'Byrne ◽  
Roy Verhage ◽  
Marie O'Brien ◽  
Dermot O'Toole ◽  
Cian Muldoon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Barrett's Esophagus (BE) is well established as the main pathological precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Progression to high grade dysplasia (HGD) or EAC varies widely between population based studies and specialized BE registries from high volume centers. No such data existed from the Republic of Ireland until 2011 when a multicenter registry was established involving three centers to more accurately determine the risk of progression to EAC in the Irish population. Methods A detailed clinical, endoscopic and pathological database includes 3397 patients from January 2008 to July 2017, with BE defined by the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM). A prospective web based database was used to gather information from three designated esophageal centers with initial and follow up data abstracted by a data manager and overseen by a project manager. Results 325 were excluded following a diagnosis of HGD or EAC at index biopsy, or being a tertiary referral, leaving 3072 with a median age of 61 and a 2.1:1 male to female ratio and a median follow up of 3 years, and 5024 person years. 127 (4%) cases progressed to HGD/EAC, 65 after one year of follow up. 55 (2%) developed EAC were identified, 30 of those within one year. The overall incidence HGD/EAC was 2.53% per year, 1.3% if the first year is excluded. The risk of progression to EAC alone was 1.09% per year, 0.5% excluding the first year. Low grade dysplasia (LGD) on index biopsy was associated with a progression rate of 11.7% per year, 4.2% with the first year excluded. Conclusion With strict data entry and pathologic quality assurance, progression rates for non-dysplastic BE was several fold higher than population studies, highlighting caution in abstracting from population data. True LGD, as evidenced in a recent report by Kestens et al.1 represent high risk disease, with most of the risk evident within the first year. Reference: 1. Kestens C, Offerhaus G, van Baal J, Siersema PD. Patients wtih Barrett's esophagus and persistent low-grade dysplasia have an increased risk for high- grade dysplasia and cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:956–962 Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagpal Singh Klair ◽  
Yousuf Zafar ◽  
Navroop Nagra ◽  
Arvind R. Murali ◽  
Mahendran Jayaraj ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a recommended treatment for Barrett’s esophagus with high grade dysplasia (BE-HGD) without a visible lesion which is managed by resection. However, currently there is no consensus on the management of BE with low grade dysplasia (BE-LGD) – RFA vs endoscopic surveillance. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of these comparative studies to compare the risk of progression to HGD or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) among patients with BE-LGD treated with RFA vs endoscopic surveillance. METHODS: The primary outcome was to compare the risk of progression to HGD or EAC among patients with BE-LGD treated with RFA vs endoscopic surveillance. RESULTS: Four comparative studies reporting a total of 543 patients with BE-LGD were included in the meta-analysis (234 in RFA and 309 in endoscopic surveillance). The progression of BE-LGD to either HGD or EAC was significantly lower in patients treated with RFA compared to endoscopic surveillance (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.65, p=0.01). The progression to HGD alone was significantly lower in patients treated with RFA vs endoscopic surveillance (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.61, p=0.003). The progression to EAC alone was numerically lower in RFA compared to endoscopic surveillance without statistical significance (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.17-1.16, p=0.09). Moderate heterogeneity was noted in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our meta-analysis, there was a significant reduction in the risk of progression to HGD or EAC among patients with BE-LGD treated with RFA compared with those undergoing endoscopic surveillance. Endoscopic eradication therapy with RFA should be the preferred management approach for BE-LGD


2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S449
Author(s):  
Maulin Shah ◽  
Christopher Deitrick ◽  
Randall Brand ◽  
Jennifer S. Chennat ◽  
Kenneth Fasanella ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document