Carcinoid Tumor of the Ileum, Complicated by Intestinal Perforation Caused by Foreign Body

1956 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor R. Jablokow
2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1183-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Ignacio Rodríguez-Hermosa ◽  
Bartomeu Ruiz-Feliú ◽  
Josep Roig-García ◽  
Maite Albiol-Quer ◽  
Pere Planellas-Giné ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-88
Author(s):  
S Kumar ◽  
T Sundaramoorthi ◽  
S Cherian ◽  
NM Sankar ◽  
BR Jaganath ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Georgii I. Sinenchenko ◽  
Vladimir G. Verbitsky ◽  
Andrey E. Demko ◽  
Anton O. Parfenov ◽  
Aleksey V. Osipov ◽  
...  

The article presents two cases of intestinal perforation by a foreign body rarely being the cause for “acute abdomen”. In both cases the disease resembled acute appendicitis. The introduction of endovideosurgical technologies into surgical practice contributes to early diagnostics of a gut wall perforation by a foreign body and allows performing only low-invasive surgical treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Kun Huang ◽  
Shao Xian Hong ◽  
I. Hsin Tai ◽  
Kai Sheng Hsieh

AbstractMagnetic foreign body misingestion (MFBM) is now occurring more frequently. It may cause remarkable mortality and morbidity in children. A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of children admitted to Xiamen Children’s Hospital between March 2017 and July 2020 due to accidental MFBM. A total of 14 children who had MFBM were collected, the proportion between urban and rural areas was 8:6, and the ratio of male to female was 6:1. The age ranged from 1.2 to 8.9 years (median 4.6 years). The number of magnetic foreign bodies ingested by mistake is 1 to 17 (average 6.5). Magnetic foreign objects are divided into magnets (3 cases) + magnetic beads (11 cases). About 40% (5/14) of this patient series showed no available misingestion history. Management includes: 4 cases of open surgery (including 1 case of laparoscopic transfer to operation), 3 cases of laparoscopic surgery, 2 cases of gastroscopy, 5 cases of conservative treatment of foreign bodies discharged through the anus. Of the 7 surgical cases, 6 cases presented with intestinal obstruction and intestinal perforation (at least 1 intestinal perforation and at most 5). Abdominal sonography has limitations in the detection of magnetic foreign bodies in the digestive tract. The proportion of laparoscopic surgery in the 7 surgical cases is nearly half. All surgical cases recovered smoothly after treatment. Our experience shows that MFBM is a big issue for the small children! The early symptoms of MFBM are often atypical especially among young children and MFBM may lead to severe adverse events. We proposed a management strategy for MFBM in children. We advise pediatricians/emergency physicians, parents/children’s guardians and society should raise the collaborated alertness of MFBM. Global awareness of risk prevention of magnetic material accidental ingestion cannot be overemphasized.


Author(s):  
Xinping Li ◽  
Bujun Ge ◽  
Hongmei Zhao ◽  
Wei Jin ◽  
Daojing Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The aim of our manuscript is to study the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of bowel perforation by foreign body ingestion. Summary of Background Data Bowel perforation, by foreign body ingestion, has been believed to be relatively rare, and most commonly caused by fish bones, chicken bones, and toothpicks. Our clinical experience,however, suggests such perforations may be more common than previously thought, and caused by various other objects as well. Methods Medical records of all patients diagnosed with foreign body-induced intestinal perforation, from the Department of General Surgery at Shanghai Tongji Hospital, from January 2000 to June 2015, were retrospectively analyzed. Results Among the 25 total patients, 4 ingested foreign bodies intentionally, while the other 21 cases were accidental.The foreign bodies were identified by plain X-ray film in 2 patients and by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in 11 patients, thus supporting the correct preoperative diagnosis (13 cases, 52%). The most common location of the perforation was the terminal ileum (n = 17).The offending objects were date stones (n=13), bones(n=7), and metallic objects (n=5). The most common treatment was removal ofthe foreign body and closure of the perforation with simple suture(n=22). Ten patients were treated laparoscopically. Conclusion The present study shows that the most common foreign bodies causing intestinal perforation are date stones and bones. Although about 50 percent of the foreign bodies could be identified by MDCT, definite diagnosis remained preoperatively difficult. Laparoscopy may be the optimal choice for diagnosis and treatment of bowel perforation by foreign bodies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document