Sa1343 CLASSIFICATION OF AUTOIMMUNE GASTRITIS BASED ON THE STATUS OF POLYGLANDULAR POLYGLANDULAR AUTOIMMUNE SYNDROME

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-324-S-325
Author(s):  
Takahisa Furuta ◽  
Takuma Kagami ◽  
Mihoko Yamade ◽  
Takahiro Suzuki ◽  
Tomohiro Higuchi ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-460
Author(s):  
Takahisa Furuta ◽  
Mihoko Yamade ◽  
Takahiro Suzuki ◽  
Tomohiro Higuchi ◽  
Shinya Tani ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Allison Elise Kerr ◽  
Wolali Odonkor ◽  
Gail Nunlee-Bland ◽  
Juanita Archer ◽  
Anitha Kolukula ◽  
...  

Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Juan Luis Fernández-Morera ◽  
Alfredo Renilla González ◽  
Carmen Elena Calvo Rodríguez ◽  
Judit Romano-García

Background: CTLA-4 and PD-1L are novel immune checkpoint targets for cancer treatment with specific side effects such as autoimmune diseases. Less frequently, the presence of several autoimmune diseases in the same patient has been described. In this communication, we illustrate the case of a 45-year-old patient with a previous diagnosis of advanced cancer that, after starting treatment with this immunotherapy, developed in the following months autoimmune diabetes, lymphocytic hypophysitis, and a Hashimoto thyroiditis in an abrupt and intense manner that would correspond to an autoimmune polyglandular disease. Discussion: The activation of autoimmunity and associated diseases is increasing in parallel with augmented indication of these immunotherapeutic treatments in cancer patients. A closer follow-up of these patients could be necessary for an optimal approach to this type of pathology. Conclusions: Different autoimmune diseases can converge in the same patient when immunotherapy for cancer is indicated to boost immune response against tumor, caused by altering immune tolerance.


2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 1044-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sand ◽  
Falk Georges Bechara ◽  
Daniel Sand ◽  
Georg Moussa ◽  
Markus Stücker ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (9999) ◽  
pp. 83-94
Author(s):  
Stanisław Czerniak ◽  

This article aims to reconstruct Max Scheler’s conception of three types of knowledge, outlined in his late work Philosophical Perspectives (1928). Scheler distinguished three kinds of knowledge: empirical, used to exercise control over nature, eidetic (essential) and metaphysical. The author reviews the epistemological criteria that underlie this distinction, and its functionalistic assumptions. In the article’s polemic part he accuses Scheler of a) crypto-dualism in his theory of knowledge, which draws insufficient distinctions between metaphysical and eidetic knowledge; b) totally omitting the status of the humanities in his classification of knowledge types; c) consistently developing a philosophy of knowledge without resort to the research tools offered by the philosophy of science, which takes such analyses out of their social and historical context (i.e. how knowledge is created in today’s scientific communities).


Nephron ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moses Elisaf ◽  
Haralampos Pappas ◽  
Kostas C. Siamopoulos

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S43
Author(s):  
Elsa Sousa ◽  
Ana João Sá ◽  
Diana Valadares ◽  
Sara Marques ◽  
Rui Carvalho ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document