Sa1756 PRIMARY BIOLOGIC-COMBINATION THERAPY IS SUPERIOR COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED CROHN'S DISEASE IN AN INTERNATIONAL INCEPTION COHORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-410-S-411
Author(s):  
Mijntje Matheeuwsen ◽  
Koen Vermeijden ◽  
Peter Bossuyt ◽  
Lieven Pouillon ◽  
Filip J. Baert ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S293-S293
Author(s):  
I Goren ◽  
H Yanai ◽  
P Pal ◽  
B Adigopula ◽  
S Pendyala ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Environmental and genetic factors might affect Crohn’s disease (CD) course. These are significantly different in developing countries such as India compared with the West, and may affect triggers of disease development and its early course. We aimed to assess early CD course in patients in India compared with Israeli patients (‘TiiiGER’ project). Methods Adults (>18 years) diagnosed with CD using accepted clinical, endoscopic and histologic criteria were prospectively recruited. Disease acceleration was defined by the first CD-related surgery, CD-related hospitalisation or recommendation to start steroids, immunomodulatory or biologic therapy. Results: Overall 104- Indian and 156-Israeli patients were recruited. Indian patients had male predominance (65.4% vs. 50.6%, p = 0.019), were diagnosed at a significantly older age (37.8 ± 12.8 vs. 31.8 ± 12.8 years, p < 0.0001), had significantly more colonic disease location (35.6% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.003), and more stenotic behaviour (36.6% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.0001), compared with Israelis. During a mean follow-up of 14.5 ± 2.7 months, disease acceleration occurred in 50% of Indian and 66.7% of Israeli patients, within a median of 7.6 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.9–25.6) and 3.4 (IQR 1.3–23) months, p = 0.05. A lower ratio of Indian patients was treated with steroids, immunomodulatory or biologic therapy (hazard ratio 0.563; 95% CI, 0.373–0.851, p = 0.006). Conclusion In this Indo-Israeli inception cohort, more than half of the patients with newly diagnosed CD experienced early disease acceleration. Distinct features, different rates of disease acceleration and treatment policies, highlight the global need for research into key factors in IBD evolution across ethnically and geographically diverse populations. *The final two authors contributed equally.


The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 389 (10080) ◽  
pp. 1710-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subra Kugathasan ◽  
Lee A Denson ◽  
Thomas D Walters ◽  
Mi-Ok Kim ◽  
Urko M Marigorta ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan B Gregg

AIEC-LF82 is a strain of bacteria that is surmised to have a role in causing IBD and Crohn’s disease by activating pro-inflammatory gene expression in organisms. Using antibiotics via combination therapy has been a technique used in clinical settings in an attempt to treat the strains, however, the attempts have not been that effective nor efficient in terms of completely halting the growth and colonization of AIEC to treat IBD and Crohn's disease patients. Research has shown that regarding hindering or preventing the colonization bacterial colonies, sequential therapy tends to be more effective and time-efficient than combination therapy, with fewer adverse effects. To test if this is also the case with the AIEC-LF82 strain of bacteria, I first tested AIEC’s response to combination therapy using the Penicillin-Streptomycin, Kanamycin-Chloramphenicol, antimicrobial peptide (AMP), Kanamycin, SPE phase and LB agar plates, all of which were experimental plates other than the LB agar plate that acted as the negative control. I then tested AIEC-LF82’s response to sequential therapy using the LB+ Kan + Spe, LB + AMP + Spe, LB+ Kan/Cam + Spe, LB + P/S + Spe, LB + P/S + Kan and LB + P/S + AMP and one LB agar plate acting as the negative control. The only differences between sets a and b were the order in which antibiotics were administered in the six aforementioned treatment sets. Ultimately, I found that set b of sequential therapy, strong-weak antibiotic treatments, was the most effective treatment but that set a regarding sequential therapy was actually the least effective of all of the treatments. In conclusion, using strong-weak sequential antibiotic therapy treatments appears to be a potentially promising option to treat patients suffering from Crohn's disease and IBD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document