Tu1902 COMPREHENSIVE REGISTERED DIETICIAN ASSESSMENT IN THE PREOPERATIVE SETTING ACCURATELY PREDICTS SARCOPENIA IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE UNDERGOING ABDOMINAL SURGERY

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1212
Author(s):  
Adeeti J. Chiplunker ◽  
Shishir Dube ◽  
Kelly Issokson ◽  
Cindy Kallman ◽  
Shirley Paski ◽  
...  
Gut ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Waterman ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Amreen Dinani ◽  
A Hillary Steinhart ◽  
Kenneth Croitoru ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 378-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Takahashi ◽  
Y. Funayama ◽  
K. Fukushima ◽  
C. Shibata ◽  
H. Ogawa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norma E Farrow ◽  
Jonathan K Aboagye ◽  
Brandyn D Lau ◽  
Peter Najjar ◽  
Dennis P Orgill ◽  
...  

Background Current guidelines recommend in-hospital venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for many patients and extended/outpatient prophylaxis in high-risk patients undergoing abdomino-pelvic surgery for cancer. Despite these guidelines, extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is not used uniformly at all institutions. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postdischarge prophylaxis practices at two academic medical centers on the rate of postdischarge venous thromboembolism. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Johns Hopkins Hospital’s American College of Surgeons, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registries from 1 August 2014 to 30 June 2015. Brigham and Women’s Hospital patients received four weeks supply of extended/outpatient venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, while Johns Hopkins Hospital patients did not. We determined the proportion of patients in each cohort that developed venous thromboembolism within 30 days of surgery. Results Four hundred and eighty-nine patients underwent abdominal surgery for cancer and inflammatory bowel disease; 181 (37.0%) patients from Brigham and Women’s Hospital and 308 (63.0%) patients from Johns Hopkins Hospital. Fourteen patients developed postoperative venous thromboembolism. Seven patients developed in-hospital venous thromboembolism and seven developed venous thromboembolism postdischarge. All postdischarge venous thromboembolism occurred in the Johns Hopkins group, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0498). There was no difference in postdischarge bleeding rates between the groups. Conclusions Extended prophylaxis likely prevents postdischarge venous thromboembolism after major abdominal surgery without an increased risk of bleeding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 148-148
Author(s):  
Lindsay Anne Sceats ◽  
Cindy Kin ◽  
Amber Trickey ◽  
Maria Polyakova ◽  
M. Kate Bundorf

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Our primary objectives were to examine the impact of biologic cost sharing on 1) adherence to biologics and 2) persistence on biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Our secondary objective was to assess the effect of biologic cost sharing on clinical IBD outcomes, including rates of hospitalization, abdominal surgery, and corticosteroid treatment. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This retrospective cohort analysis used a national insurance claims database (Optum Clinformatics DataMart) to assess adult IBD patients enrolled in medium or large private insurance plans from 2007-2016. Patients were followed for one year of continuous enrollment after their index biologic claim. We assessed adherence to biologic medications (medication possession ratio >0.8) dependent on patient cost sharing, as measured by an employer-plan’s average out-of-pocket biologic medication cost. We also examined the effects of patient cost sharing for biologics on need for hospitalization, abdominal surgery, or corticosteroid treatment. We used multivariate logistic regression models adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics. We estimated the effect of cost sharing on biologic therapy persistence using repeated measures proportional hazard survival models. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We identified 2,193 adult IBD patients who initiated biologic therapy and met study criteria (Crohn’s disease 66.1% vs. ulcerative colitis 24.9%, mean age 40.8 years, mean Charlson index 0.50). Median [IQR] out-of-pocket cost per 30-day biologic prescription was $62 [$34 - $157]. 66.9% of patients were adherent to biologic therapy. Higher out-of-pocket costs for biologics were associated with increased odds of nonadherence; patients with ulcerative colitis were more price-responsive than patients with Crohn’s disease or indeterminate colitis (Figure 1). However, higher out-of-pocket biologic costs were not associated with increased odds of all-cause or IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, or corticosteroid prescriptions for IBD flares. Patients whose out-of-pocket costs were less than $10 per 30-day biologic prescription persisted on biologic therapy for significantly longer than patients who paid >$10 (Figure 2). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Nonadherence to biologics increases when IBD patients face higher out-of-pocket costs, particularly for ulcerative colitis patients. However, this is not associated with worse clinical outcomes. Patients with cost-sharing<$10 persisted on biologics longer than patients whose cost sharing exceeded $10.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document