105 CLINICAL AND ENDOSCOPIC RESPONSE TO TREAT-TO-TARGET VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE IN CROHN'S DISEASE PATIENTS TREATED WITH USTEKINUMAB: WEEK 48 RESULTS OF THE STARDUST TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-25
Author(s):  
Silvio Danese ◽  
Séverine Vermeire ◽  
Geert R. D'Haens ◽  
Julian Panes ◽  
Axel Dignass ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S049-S052 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Danese ◽  
S Vermeire ◽  
G D’Haens ◽  
J Panés ◽  
A Dignass ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Treat-to-target (T2T) strategy may optimise IBD disease management. We describe interim clinical and endoscopic results of the STARDUST trial in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients, following 16 weeks (W) of ustekinumab (UST) induction. Methods STARDUST, an ongoing phase 3b randomised strategy trial, enrolled adults with moderate–severely active CD (CD activity index [CDAI] 220–450) and simple endoscopic index for CD [SES-CD] ≥3) who failed conventional therapy ±1 biologic. At W0, patients received intravenous, weight-based UST of ~6mg/kg (approved label) and at W8, subcutaneous UST 90mg. At W16, patients with CDAI reduction ≥70 points were randomised (1:1) to T2T or standard of care. Key endpoints (intention-to-treat [ITT] set, as observed) were analysed at W8 and W16: % patients in clinical remission (CDAI score <150); % patients with a clinical response (CDAI <150 or decrease vs. baseline [BL] ≥100 points); faecal calprotectin (FCal) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels: normalisation of FCal or/and CRP; improvement ≥50% vs. BL (patients with elevated FCal and CRP subpopulations); change vs. BL in CDAI and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) total scores. Patients randomised to T2T underwent colonoscopy at W16 and were analysed for change in SES-CD score vs. BL, endoscopic response (decrease in SES-CD score ≥50% vs. BL) and endoscopic remission (SES-CD score ≤2) (central reading). Results The ITT full set included 500 patients with BL mean (SD) CDAI score 282.3 (65.8), SES-CD 13.1 (8.1), CRP 15.7 (23.4) mg/l, FCal 1741.9 (2932.1) mg/g and disease duration 9.4 (8.7) years; 58.4% previously failed 1 biologic. At W16, 79.4% of patients had a clinical response and 66.6% were in clinical remission. About half of the patients showed ≥50% improvement in FCal and CRP levels, which normalised in about 1/3 of patients. Results were similar irrespective of previous biologic (Table 1); 84% of patients in response at W16 were in clinical remission. Statistically significant changes from BL in CDAI, FCal, and CRP were observed at W8, and in IBDQ scores at W16 (Table 2). In the T2T set (n = 220; CDAI 70 responders), BL characteristics were similar to the full analysis set; SES-CD score was 13.4 (8.8). At W16, 36.8% and 11.4% of patients in the T2T set achieved endoscopic response and remission, respectively. The endoscopic response was independent of BL SES-CD score and disease duration, but numerically better for colonic vs. ileal disease. No new safety signals were reported. Conclusion STARDUST is the first T2T trial in CD patients. After 16 W following induction with UST, 2/3 of patients achieved clinical remission. Thirty-seven per cent of those randomised to the T2T arm (CDAI 70 responders) showed endoscopic response by central reading at W16. Results were similar irrespective of being bio-naïve or failing 1 biologic.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S032-S033
Author(s):  
S Danese ◽  
S Vermeire ◽  
G D’Haens ◽  
J Panés ◽  
A Dignass ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The STARDUST study demonstrated that ustekinumab (UST), using either a treat-to-target (T2T) or standard of care (SoC) strategy, may induce and maintain endoscopic and clinical response and remission in Crohn’s disease (CD). Primary endpoint, safety, and efficacy have been reported previously.1 Because corticosteroid (CS) sparing is an important aim of CD management, we compared the efficacy of UST T2T vs SoC in achieving CS-free clinical remission and endoscopic response. Methods Adult patients (pts) with moderate–severely active CD who were CDAI 70 responders after 16 weeks (W) of induction, comprising a single dose of UST 6 mg/kg iv followed by UST 90 mg SC at W8, were randomized to either T2T or SoC arms. In the T2T arm, choice of UST maintenance dosage (q12w or q8w) was based on endoscopic improvement at W16, followed by clinical and biomarker-directed dose escalation up to q4w; in the SoC arm, UST q12w or q8w dosage was based on EU SmPC. Primary endpoint was endoscopic response (Simple Endoscopic Score in CD [SES-CD] decrease from baseline [BL] ≥50%) at W48. For pts on CS at W16, CS tapering was mandatory. At W48, CS-free clinical remission (CDAI <150 and no CS for ≥30 days) and CS-free endoscopic response (reduction from BL in SES-CD ≥50% and no CS for ≥30 days) were evaluated. Results Of 500 pts enrolled, 441 achieved a CDAI 70 response at W16 and were randomized to T2T (n=220) or SoC (n=221); 79.1% and 87.3%, respectively, completed W48. Among clinical remitters and responders at W16 (start of CS tapering), in both T2T and SoC arms more than 70% were still in remission or response at W48 (Figure 1). CS use throughout 48 weeks of treatment is summarized in Table 1. At W48, in T2T and SoC arms similar rates were noted for CS-free endoscopic response (33.6% and 28.5%, respectively) and CS-free clinical remission (56.4% and 63.3%, respectively). Notably, in T2T and SoC arms the CS-free clinical remission rate among pts on CS at BL was 44.1% and 45.1%, respectively (Figure 2). Among W48 endoscopic responders (T2T, n=83; SoC, n=66), CS-free endoscopic response rate was 89.2% and 95.5%, respectively; among W48 clinical remitters (T2T, n=135; SoC, n=154), CS-free clinical remission rate was 91.9% and 90.9%, in T2T and SoC arms, respectively. Conclusion Pts treated with UST under T2T or SoC strategies achieved similar rates of CS-free clinical remission and endoscopic response over 48 weeks. Overall for pts on CS at BL, UST reduced the need for CS while achieving response/remission. Most (>89%) pts with endoscopic response/clinical remission at W48 were also CS-free responders/remitters. Reference


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S046-S048
Author(s):  
T Kucharzik ◽  
R Wilkens ◽  
G Maconi ◽  
M A D’Agostino ◽  
M Le Bars ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive tool for evaluating transmural disease activity in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. We report interim Week (W)16 results from an IUS substudy of STARDUST, a phase 3B randomised trial of CD patients treated with ustekinumab (UST), comparing a treat-to-target (T2T) maintenance treatment strategy vs. standard of care (SoC). The aim of the substudy was to assess changes in IUS parameters, including transmural response to UST induction therapy. Methods Patients (≥18 years) with moderate–severe active CD (CD Activity Index [CDAI] 220–450 and simple endoscopic index for CD [SES-CD] ≥3) who failed conventional therapy and/or 1 biologic, received weight-based IV UST dosing of ~6mg/kg at Week 0, then SC UST 90mg at W8. At Week 16, patients with CDAI reduction ≥70 points were randomised (1:1) to T2T or SoC treatment arms. Exclusion criteria: characteristics precluding IUS visualisation of affected bowel segments and normal bowel wall thickness (BWT) (≤2.0mm terminal ileum; ≤3.0mm colon) for all segments at baseline (BL). Key IUS endpoints assessed at W4, W8 and W16 (central reading): IUS response ≥25% BWT reduction from BL; BWT change from BL (mm); IUS remission (transmural healing) ‒ BWT normalisation, colour Doppler signal ≤1, normal echo stratification, and absence of inflammatory fat. The most affected bowel segment at BL was used for all IUS parameters. Correlations/% agreement between IUS response/remission and clinical (CDAI70, clinical response/remission), biomarker (CRP/FCal levels) and endoscopy outcomes (SES-CD scores) were assessed. Results The analysis included 82/94 patients enrolled in the IUS substudy; n = 76 patients had BL and ≥1 post-BL IUS assessment. BL characteristics were similar to those of the main STARDUST population. Overall IUS response and remission (transmural healing) rates at W16 were 33.8% and 11.3%, respectively (Table 1). The most affected segments were ileum in 66% and colon in 34% of patients, with better outcomes found in the colon (Table 2). BWT and Doppler’s signal started to normalise at W8, inflammatory fat and echo stratification at W16 (Table 2). Mean BWT improvement from BL was statistically significant as early as W4 (p = 0.0002; Table 3). Moderate agreement was observed between earlier IUS responses and later biomarkers/endoscopic improvements. Conclusion This was the first international, interventional, multicentre study using IUS in CD. IUS response to UST was detected as early as Week 4, and a clinically meaningful % of patients achieved transmural healing, primarily in the colon, at W16. IUS could be a valuable tool to detect early response to treatment in CD. Future studies need to confirm whether early IUS response is predictive of long-term outcomes for CD patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S039-S039
Author(s):  
S Danese ◽  
S Vermeire ◽  
A Dignass ◽  
J Panés ◽  
G D’Haens ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The 48-week (W) interventional STARDUST trial assessed whether a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy using ustekinumab (UST) may optimize Crohn’s disease (CD) outcomes; primary efficacy and safety data have been reported before.1 Here we assessed which patient (pt) subgroups may benefit from T2T vs standard of care (SoC) in achieving endoscopic response after 1 year of UST treatment. Methods Adult pts with moderate–severely active CD (CD activity index [CDAI] 220–450) and Simple Endoscopic Score in CD [SES-CD] ≥3) who failed conventional therapy and/or 1 biologic were included. Pts received iv, weight-based UST ~6 mg/kg at W0 (baseline [BL]); then SC UST 90 mg at W8. At W16, CDAI 70 responders were randomized (1:1) to T2T or SoC arms. Pts in the T2T arm were assigned to SC UST q12w or q8w based on 25% improvement in SES-CD score vs BL. From W16–48, UST dose was further intensified up to q4w if the following were not met: CDAI <220 and ≥70-point improvement from BL, and C-reactive protein ≤10 mg/L or faecal calprotectin (FCal) ≤250 µg/g. Pts who failed treatment target despite UST q4w were discontinued. In the SoC arm, UST dose was assigned based on EU SmPC (q12w or q8w). We report the treatment effect for the primary endpoint (endoscopic response [≥50% improvement in SES-CD score vs BL] at W48), evaluated for subgroups of pts, based on demographics at BL. For each subgroup, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of T2T vs SoC were provided based on the logistic regression model that included treatment arm and stratification factors (prior exposure to biologics [none or 1] and SES-CD score [≤16, > 16] at BL) as independent variables. Results Of 500 pts enrolled, 441 were randomized to T2T (n=220) or SoC (n=221); 79.1% and 87.3% completed W48. At W48, pts randomized to T2T were more likely to achieve endoscopic response compared to SoC (p<0.05), if they had at BL: (i) longer disease duration (>median [79.1 months]; OR 2.2; 95%CI 1.17–3.94); (ii) clinically moderate disease (CDAI ≤300; OR 1.7; 95%CI 1.03–2.76); (iii) normal FCal (≤250; OR 3.0; 95%CI 1.22–7.56), (iv) endoscopically active CD (SES-CD ≥4 for ileal or ≥6 for colonic and/or ileocolonic disease; OR 1.8; 95%CI 1.10–2.91); and (v) history or presence of strictures/fistula or occurrence of an intra-abdominal abscess (OR 2.3; 95%CI 1.06–5.01 and OR 3.5; 95%CI 1.07–11.19, respectively; Figure 1). Conclusion T2T was more effective than SoC (p<0.05) in achieving endoscopic response after 1 year of UST treatment in certain subgroups including pts with higher endoscopic scores at BL and those with history/presence of bowel damage. Reference


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 2060-2067.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Oliva ◽  
Marina Aloi ◽  
Franca Viola ◽  
Saverio Mallardo ◽  
Fortunata Civitelli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S467-S467
Author(s):  
A Srinivasan ◽  
D R van Langenberg ◽  
R Little ◽  
M P Sparrow ◽  
P De Cruz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Virtual clinics (VC) represent a novel model-of-care which promote quality use of biologics and facilitate a treat-to-target (T2T) approach. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and process-driven outcomes of intensified anti-TNF therapy for secondary loss of response (SLoR) in a VC compared with standard outpatient care (SoC). Methods A retrospective multicenter, parallel observational cohort study of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who underwent anti-TNF dose intensification to address SLoR with up to 2-years of follow-up was undertaken. Objective assessments of disease activity and anti-TNF trough levels at SLoR then during subsequent 6-month semesters were compared longitudinally between VC and SoC groups. ‘Anti-TNF escalation success’ was the primary endpoint, defined as achieved when two consecutive 6-month semesters of objective assessment demonstrated inactive disease. Dose intensification was defined as ‘appropriate’ if there was both objective evidence of disease activity, plus anti-TNF trough levels at or below the lower limit of the therapeutic range prior to intensification. ‘Treatment escalation failure’ was defined by the occurrence of one or more of biologic switching, discontinuation or further intensification; recommencement of corticosteroids, or IBD-related surgery. Results 149 patients (69 VC vs. 80 SoC) underwent infliximab (n = 94) or adalimumab (n = 55) dose intensification with similar baseline patient, disease and treatment characteristics between cohorts. The median duration of follow-up post dose-intensification was 1.9 and 1.5 years for the SoC and VC cohorts respectively (p = 0.37). There were higher rates of appropriate dose intensification (82.6 vs. 40.0%, p < 0.01) across the VC cohort. Higher proportions of anti-TNF escalation success (60.9 v 35.0%, p < 0.01), biomarker remission (i.e., C-Reactive Protein (<5mg/l) and faecal calprotectin (<150 μg/ml) normalisation, log-rank tests, p = 0.06 and p < 0.01 respectively), tight disease monitoring (84.1 vs. 28.8%, p < 0.01) and de-escalation of intensified therapy (21.3 vs. 10.0%, p = 0.03) were also achieved by the VC cohort following dose-intensification. Conclusion This study favoured a VC-led model of care over standard outpatient-based IBD care in facilitating an effective T2T approach to CD management. A VC model of care improved quality use of intensified anti-TNF therapy through processes that promoted appropriate dose intensification and encouraged more frequent anti-TNF dose de-escalation. Moreover, tight semester-based monitoring using a T2T-based strategy facilitated by the VC was associated with improved treatment outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1342-1352
Author(s):  
Ashish Srinivasan ◽  
Daniel R. van Langenberg ◽  
Robert D. Little ◽  
Miles P. Sparrow ◽  
Peter De Cruz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1042-1050.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Bouguen ◽  
Barrett G. Levesque ◽  
Brian G. Feagan ◽  
Arthur Kavanaugh ◽  
Laurent Peyrin–Biroulet ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S642-S643
Author(s):  
Francesca Zorzi ◽  
Elisabetta Lolli ◽  
Sara Onali ◽  
Carmelina Petruzziello ◽  
Massimo C. Fantini ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S328-S330
Author(s):  
J Schulberg ◽  
E Wright ◽  
B Holt ◽  
T Sutherland ◽  
A Ross ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Strictures are the commonest complication in Crohn’s disease. Surgery and endoscopic dilation are the main treatments; drug therapy has been considered contra-indicated. Given that most strictures have an inflammatory component we aimed to assess the efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy, and to identify the optimal treatment. Methods In this randomised trial patients with symptomatic Crohn’s disease strictures and inflammation were assessed by imaging (MRI, colonoscopy, intestinal ultrasound) and for inflammation (faecal calprotectin and CRP). Symptoms were assessed using an Obstructive Symptom Score (OSS). Patients with short endoscopically-accessible strictures had a baseline endoscopic balloon dilation if indicated. Patients were then randomised 2:1 to high dose adalimumab induction (160mg weekly for 4 weeks) with 40mg fortnightly maintenance plus thiopurine, with therapy increased for ongoing inflammation at 4 and 8 months, versus standard dose adalimumab mono-therapy. At 12 months primary endpoint was improved OSS. Secondary outcomes: disease activity, treatment failure, stricture morphology, inflammation, psychological well-being, disability, and quality of life. MRI was assessed blindly. Results 52 patients were randomised to the intensive and 25 to the standard treatment arm. 27 of 52 (52%) intensive treatment patients dose escalated at 4 or 8 months. Improved OSS at 12 months occurred in 41 (79%) intensive treatment and 16 (64%) standard treatment arms (P=0.17). Treatment failure was less common in the intensive treatment arm (10%) versus the standard treatment arm (28%) (P=0·045). Faecal calprotectin normalised (<100mcg/g) in 32 (62%) v 11 (44%) (P=0.15), and CRP normalised in 32 (62%) v 11 (44%) (P=0.15), in intensive versus standard treatment arms respectively. MRI stricture morphology improvement (MaRIA score decrease ≥25%) was seen in 31 (61%) v 9 (28%) (P=0.009) and in 40 (78%) v 14 (56%) using the simplified MaRIA score (≥1 point improvement) (P=0.047). Improvement in bowel wall thickness by >25% on ultrasound was seen in 22/43 (51%) and 7/21 (33%) respectively (P=0.18). MRI complete stricture resolution was seen in 10/51 (20%) and 4/25 (16%) (P=0.7). At 12 month colonoscopy 22/48 (46%) v 9/25 (36%) strictures were passable (P=0.42). 12 month median drug levels were 13.2µg/ml and 6.6µg/ml respectively (P<0.0001). See summary results figure 1 and case example figure 2. Conclusion Crohn’s disease strictures are responsive to drug therapy. A majority of patients experience symptom improvement and many have improved stricture morphology. Treat-to-target therapy intensification results in less treatment failure, less stricture-associated inflammation, and greater improvement in stricture morphology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document