Impact of Multimodal Endoscopic Therapy on Outcome of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (AUGIB): Comparison Between 2002 and 1983-85 in the Treviso Area (North-East Italy)

2004 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. P162
Author(s):  
Silvano Loperfido ◽  
Ludovica Bellina ◽  
Nadia Dal Bo ◽  
Sira Bizzotto ◽  
Elena Piovesana ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-508-S-509
Author(s):  
MARILISA FRANCESCHI ◽  
Gianluca Baldassarre ◽  
Sofia Bencivenni ◽  
Antonio Ferronato ◽  
Francesco Tomba ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Durayd Alzoubaidi ◽  
Laurence B Lovat ◽  
Rehan Haidry

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is one of the most common medical emergencies in the UK. Despite advancement in technology the management of AUGIB remains a challenge. The clinical community recognise the need for improvement in the treatment of these patients. AUGIB has a significant impact on resources. Endoscopic therapy is the gold standard treatment. The mortality in AUGIB is rarely related to the presenting bleed but significantly associated with concurrent comorbidities. The cost of blood transfusion in the management of patients with AUGIB is significant and misuse of blood products has been documented nationally. Risk stratification tools such as Glasgow-Blatchford Score, Rockall Score and the AIMS65 score have allowed clinicians to triage patients appropriately in order to deliver endoscopic therapy within a suitable time frame. Endoscopic therapeutic modalities such as epinephrine injection, heat thermocoagulation and mechanical clips have had a positive impact on patient’s management. However, in order to continue to improve patient’s outcomes, further developments are needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Kijan Maharjan ◽  
Rajesh Kumar Mandal ◽  
Sanjay Shrestha

BACKGROUND: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a potentially life-threatening condition that requires rapid assessment in the emergency department. The current available scores are complex and have not been widely used in clinical practice. AIMS65 score is a simple score that can be used to risk stratify patients with AUGIB. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study done at a single tertiary centre, NAMS, Bir Hospital among the patients presenting with AUGIB from August 2018 to January 2019. AIMS65 scores were calculated in patients presenting with acute UGIB by allotting 1 point each for albumin level < 3g/dl, INR > 1.5, alteration in mental status, systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg, and age ≥65 years. Risk stratification was done during the initial 12 hours of hospital admission. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients consisting of 68 males and 16 females were enrolled in our study, with age ranging from 27 to 80 years. ICU admission, endoscopic therapy and blood transfusion were required in 22,44 and 49 patients respectively. In-patient mortality, the need for blood transfusion, endoscopic therapy or ICU admission were higher in those with AIMS65 score ≥ 2 showing statistically significant positive association (p=0.000). CONCLUSION: AIMS65 score is a simple non-endoscopic risk score that can be applied in patients of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding to risk stratify and to predict in-patient mortality, the need for blood transfusion, endoscopic therapy or ICU admission.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document