Asge guidelines for colonoscopy: A study of appropria teness and usefulness comparing a gastroenterology training program, a general surgery residency program, and a gastroenterology private practice

1997 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. AB49
Author(s):  
Muhammed Iqbal ◽  
Puneet Goenka ◽  
Pranab Das ◽  
Mark F. Young
2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110111
Author(s):  
Kurun Partap S Oberoi ◽  
Akia D Caine ◽  
Jacob Schwartzman ◽  
Sayeeda Rab ◽  
Amber L Turner ◽  
...  

Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires residents to receive milestone-based evaluations in key areas. Shortcomings of the traditional evaluation system (TES) are a low completion rate and delay in completion. We hypothesized that adoption of a mobile evaluation system (MES) would increase the number of evaluations completed and improve their timeliness. Methods Traditional evaluations for a general surgery residency program were converted into a web-based form via a widely available, free, and secure application and implemented in August 2017. After 8 months, MES data were analyzed and compared to that of our TES. Results 122 mobile evaluations were completed; 20% were solicited by residents. Introduction of the MES resulted in an increased number of evaluations per resident ( P = .0028) and proportion of faculty completing evaluations ( P = .0220). Timeliness also improved, with 71% of evaluations being completed during one’s clinical rotation. Conclusions A resident-driven MES is an inexpensive and effective method to augment traditional end-of-rotation evaluations.


Author(s):  
Sarah Lund ◽  
Taleen MacArthur ◽  
Jonie Keune ◽  
Teresa Enger ◽  
Jorys Martinez-Jorge ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rodrigo TEJOS ◽  
Rubén AVILA ◽  
Martin INZUNZA ◽  
Pablo ACHURRA ◽  
Richard CASTILLO ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: A General Surgery Residency may last between 2-6 years, depending on the country. A shorter General Surgery Residency must optimize residents’ surgical exposure. Simulated surgical training is known to shorten the learning curves, but information related to how it affects a General Surgery Residency regarding clinical exposure is scarce. Aim: To analyze the effect of introducing a validated laparoscopic simulated training program in abdominal procedures performed by residents in a three-year General Surgery Residency program. Methods: A non-concurrent cohort study was designed. Four-generations (2012-2015) of graduated surgeons were included. Only abdominal procedures in which the graduated surgeons were the primary surgeon were described and analyzed. The control group was of graduated surgeons from 2012 without the laparoscopic simulated training program. Surgical procedures per program year, surgical technique, emergency/elective intervention and hospital-site (main/community hospitals) were described. Results: Interventions of 28 graduated surgeons were analyzed (control group=5; laparoscopic simulated training program=23). Graduated surgeons performed a mean of 372 abdominal procedures, with a higher mean number of medium-to-complex procedures in laparoscopic simulated training program group (48 vs. 30, p=0.02). Graduated surgeons trained with laparoscopic simulated training program performed a higher number of total abdominal procedures (384 vs. 319, p=0.04) and laparoscopic procedures (183 vs. 148, p<0.05). Conclusions: The introduction of laparoscopic simulated training program may increase the number and complexity of total and laparoscopic procedures in a three-year General Surgery Residency.


2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 650-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria B.J. Chun ◽  
Keane G.M. Young ◽  
Andrea F. Honda ◽  
Gary F. Belcher ◽  
Gregory G. Maskarinec

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 283-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Watson ◽  
Timothy D. Flesher ◽  
Oscar Ruiz ◽  
Joshua S. Chung

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document