Radiation exposure to surgeon and patient in intramedullary nailing of the lower limb

Injury ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 723-727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Madan ◽  
Charles Blakeway
Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1209
Author(s):  
Gabriel Keller ◽  
Simon Götz ◽  
Mareen Sarah Kraus ◽  
Leonard Grünwald ◽  
Fabian Springer ◽  
...  

This study analyzed the radiation exposure of a new ultra-low dose (ULD) protocol compared to a high-quality (HQ) protocol for CT-torsion measurement of the lower limb. The analyzed patients (n = 60) were examined in the period March to October 2019. In total, 30 consecutive patients were examined with the HQ and 30 consecutive patients with the new ULD protocol comprising automatic tube voltage selection, automatic exposure control, and iterative image reconstruction algorithms. Radiation dose parameters as well as the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and diagnostic confidence (DC; rated by two radiologists) were analyzed and potential predictor variables, such as body mass index and body volume, were assessed. The new ULD protocol resulted in significantly lower radiation dose parameters, with a reduction of the median total dose equivalent to 0.17 mSv in the ULD protocol compared to 4.37 mSv in the HQ protocol (p < 0.001). Both groups showed no significant differences in regard to other parameters (p = 0.344–0.923). CNR was 12.2% lower using the new ULD protocol (p = 0.033). DC was rated best by both readers in every HQ CT and in every ULD CT. The new ULD protocol for CT-torsion measurement of the lower limb resulted in a 96% decrease of radiation exposure down to the level of a single pelvic radiograph while maintaining good image quality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4g) ◽  
pp. 501-504
Author(s):  
Dr. Kamal Kumar Arora ◽  
Dr. Simranjit Singh ◽  
Dr. Priti Chaudhary ◽  
Dr. Rajesh Kapila ◽  
Dr. Rajan Sharma ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Hindley ◽  
R.A. Evans ◽  
E.M. Holt ◽  
J.W. Metcalfe

ISRN Surgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Rohilla ◽  
Roop Singh ◽  
Narender K. Magu ◽  
Ashish Devgan ◽  
Ramchander Siwach ◽  
...  

Introduction. Closed reduction is a critical component of the intramedullary nailing and at times can be difficult and technically challenging resulting in increased operative time. Fluoroscopy is used extensively to achieve closed reduction which increases the intra-operative radiation exposure. Materials and Methods. Sixty patients with femoral diaphyseal fractures treated by locked intramedullary nailing were randomized in two groups. In group I, fracture reduction was performed under fluoroscopy with a cannulated reamer in the proximal fragment or with simultaneous use of a cannulated reamer in the proximal fragment and a Schanz screw in the distal fragment. Patients in group II had fracture reduction under fluoroscopy alone. Results. Closed reduction was achieved in 29 patients in group I and 25 patients in group II. The guide wire insertion time, time for nail insertion and its distal locking, total operative time, and total fluoroscopic time were 26.57, 27.93, 68.03, and 0.19 minutes in group I, compared with 30.87, 27.83, 69.93, and 0.24 minutes in group II, respectively. The average number of images taken to achieve guide wire insertion, for nail insertion and its locking and for the complete procedure in group I, respectively, was 12.33, 25.27, and 37.6 compared with 22.1, 26.17, and 48.27, respectively, in group II. Conclusion. The use of cannulated reamer in proximal fragment as intramedullary joystick and Schanz screw and in the distal fragment as percutaneous joystick facilitates closed reduction of the fracture during closed intramedullary femoral nailing with statistically significant reduction in guide wire insertion time and radiation exposure.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1005-1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhsin Dursun ◽  
Tughan Kalkan ◽  
Mahmut Nedim Aytekin ◽  
İsmail Çelik ◽  
Mahmut Uğurlu

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabur Malek ◽  
Eirian Davies ◽  
Ibrahim A. Malek ◽  
Arvind Rawal ◽  
Alok Singh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document