scholarly journals Hydrolytic cleavage of nascent RNA in RNA polymerase III ternary transcription complexes.

1994 ◽  
Vol 269 (3) ◽  
pp. 2299-2306
Author(s):  
S.K. Whitehall ◽  
C. Bardeleben ◽  
G.A. Kassavetis
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Hydrolytic Cleavage ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Nascent Rna ◽  
Transcription Complexes

Eukaryotic transcription termination factor La mediates transcript release and facilitates reinitiation by RNA polymerase III

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 2147-2158
Author(s):  
R J Maraia ◽  
D J Kenan ◽  
J D Keene
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Transcription Termination ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Pol Iii

Ample evidence indicates that Alu family interspersed elements retrotranspose via primary transcripts synthesized by RNA polymerase III (pol III) and that this transposition sometimes results in genetic disorders in humans. However, Alu primary transcripts can be processed posttranscriptionally, diverting them away from the transposition pathway. The pol III termination signal of a well-characterized murine B1 (Alu-equivalent) element inhibits RNA 3' processing, thereby stabilizing the putative transposition intermediary. We used an immobilized template-based assay to examine transcription termination by VA1, 7SL, and Alu class III templates and the role of transcript release in the pol III terminator-dependent inhibition of processing of B1-Alu transcripts. We found that the RNA-binding protein La confers this terminator-dependent 3' processing inhibition on transcripts released from the B1-Alu template. Using pure recombinant La protein and affinity-purified transcription complexes, we also demonstrate that La facilitates multiple rounds of transcription reinitiation by pol III. These results illustrate an important role for La in RNA production by demonstrating its ability to clear the termination sites of class III templates, thereby promoting efficient use of transcription complexes by pol III. The role of La as a potential regulatory factor in transcript maturation and how this might apply to Alu interspersed elements is discussed.

scholarly journals Silk gland-specific tRNA(Ala) genes interact more weakly than constitutive tRNA(Ala) genes with silkworm TFIIIB and polymerase III fractions.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1806-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Sullivan ◽  
L S Young ◽  
C N White ◽  
K U Sprague
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Silk Gland ◽  
Flanking Sequence ◽  
Transcription Machinery ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Active Transcription ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Transcription Complexes

Constitutive and silk gland-specific tRNA(Ala) genes from silkworms have very different transcriptional properties in vitro. Typically, the constitutive type, which encodes tRNA(AlaC), directs transcription much more efficiently than does the silk gland-specific type, which encodes tRNA(AlaSG). We think that the inefficiency of the tRNA(AlaCG) gene underlies its capacity to be turned off in non-silk gland cells. An economical model is that the tRNA(AlaSG) promoter interacts poorly, relative to the tRNA(AlaC) promoter, with one or more components of the basal transcription machinery. As a consequence, the tRNA(AlaSG) gene directs the formation of fewer transcription complexes or of complexes with reduced cycling ability. Here we show that the difference in the number of active transcription complexes accounts for the difference in tRNA(AlaC) and tRNA(AlaSG) transcription rates. To determine whether a particular component of the silkworm transcription machinery is responsible for reduced complex formation on the tRNA(AlaSG) gene, we measured competition by templates for defined fractions of this machinery. We find that the tRNA(AlaSG) gene is greatly impaired, in comparison with the tRNA(AlaC) gene, in competition for either TFIIIB or RNA polymerase III. Competition for each of these fractions is also strongly influenced by the nature of the 5' flanking sequence, the promoter element responsible for the distinctive transcriptional properties of tRNA(AlaSG) and tRNA(AlaC) genes. These results suggest that differential interaction with TFIIIB or RNA polymerase III is a critical functional distinction between these genes.

scholarly journals Genomic binding profiles of functionally distinct RNA polymerase III transcription complexes in human cells

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 635-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zarmik Moqtaderi ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Debasish Raha ◽  
Robert J White ◽  
Michael Snyder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Transcription Complexes

scholarly journals Phosphorylation of the Human La Antigen on Serine 366 Can Regulate Recycling of RNA Polymerase III Transcription Complexes

Cell ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 707-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Fan ◽  
Amy L Sakulich ◽  
John L Goodier ◽  
Xiaolong Zhang ◽  
Jun Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
La Antigen ◽  
Transcription Complexes

scholarly journals Eukaryotic transcription termination factor La mediates transcript release and facilitates reinitiation by RNA polymerase III.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 2147-2158 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J Maraia ◽  
D J Kenan ◽  
J D Keene
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Transcription Termination ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Pol Iii

Ample evidence indicates that Alu family interspersed elements retrotranspose via primary transcripts synthesized by RNA polymerase III (pol III) and that this transposition sometimes results in genetic disorders in humans. However, Alu primary transcripts can be processed posttranscriptionally, diverting them away from the transposition pathway. The pol III termination signal of a well-characterized murine B1 (Alu-equivalent) element inhibits RNA 3' processing, thereby stabilizing the putative transposition intermediary. We used an immobilized template-based assay to examine transcription termination by VA1, 7SL, and Alu class III templates and the role of transcript release in the pol III terminator-dependent inhibition of processing of B1-Alu transcripts. We found that the RNA-binding protein La confers this terminator-dependent 3' processing inhibition on transcripts released from the B1-Alu template. Using pure recombinant La protein and affinity-purified transcription complexes, we also demonstrate that La facilitates multiple rounds of transcription reinitiation by pol III. These results illustrate an important role for La in RNA production by demonstrating its ability to clear the termination sites of class III templates, thereby promoting efficient use of transcription complexes by pol III. The role of La as a potential regulatory factor in transcript maturation and how this might apply to Alu interspersed elements is discussed.

Formation of open and elongating transcription complexes by RNA polymerase III

1992 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Kassavetis ◽  
Jaime A. Blanco ◽  
Terence E. Johnson ◽  
E.Peter Geiduschek
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Transcription Complexes

Transcription termination by RNA polymerase III: uncoupling of polymerase release from termination signal recognition

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 2260-2272
Author(s):  
F E Campbell ◽  
D R Setzer
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Termination ◽  
Transcription Elongation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
5S Rrna ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
5S Rrna Gene ◽  
Nascent Rna

Xenopus RNA polymerase III specifically initiates transcription on poly(dC)-tailed DNA templates in the absence of other class III transcription factors normally required for transcription initiation. In experimental analyses of transcription termination using DNA fragments with a 5S rRNA gene positioned downstream of the tailed end, only 40% of the transcribing polymerase molecules terminate at the normally efficient Xenopus borealis somatic-type 5S rRNA terminators; the remaining 60% read through these signals and give rise to runoff transcripts. We find that the nascent RNA strand is inefficiently displaced from the DNA template during transcription elongation. Interestingly, only polymerases synthesizing a displaced RNA terminate at the 5S rRNA gene terminators; when the nascent RNA is not displaced from the template, read-through transcripts are synthesized. RNAs with 3' ends at the 5S rRNA gene terminators are judged to result from authentic termination events on the basis of multiple criteria, including kinetic properties, the precise 3' ends generated, release of transcripts from the template, and recycling of the polymerase. Even though only 40% of the polymerase molecules ultimately terminate at either of the tandem 5S rRNA gene terminators, virtually all polymerases pause there, demonstrating that termination signal recognition can be experimentally uncoupled from polymerase release. Thus, termination is dependent on RNA strand displacement during transcription elongation, whereas termination signal recognition is not. We interpret our results in terms of a two-step model for transcription termination in which polymerase release is dependent on the fate of the nascent RNA strand during transcription elongation.

Silk gland-specific tRNA(Ala) genes interact more weakly than constitutive tRNA(Ala) genes with silkworm TFIIIB and polymerase III fractions

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1806-1814
Author(s):  
H S Sullivan ◽  
L S Young ◽  
C N White ◽  
K U Sprague
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Silk Gland ◽  
Flanking Sequence ◽  
Transcription Machinery ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Active Transcription ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Transcription Complexes

Constitutive and silk gland-specific tRNA(Ala) genes from silkworms have very different transcriptional properties in vitro. Typically, the constitutive type, which encodes tRNA(AlaC), directs transcription much more efficiently than does the silk gland-specific type, which encodes tRNA(AlaSG). We think that the inefficiency of the tRNA(AlaCG) gene underlies its capacity to be turned off in non-silk gland cells. An economical model is that the tRNA(AlaSG) promoter interacts poorly, relative to the tRNA(AlaC) promoter, with one or more components of the basal transcription machinery. As a consequence, the tRNA(AlaSG) gene directs the formation of fewer transcription complexes or of complexes with reduced cycling ability. Here we show that the difference in the number of active transcription complexes accounts for the difference in tRNA(AlaC) and tRNA(AlaSG) transcription rates. To determine whether a particular component of the silkworm transcription machinery is responsible for reduced complex formation on the tRNA(AlaSG) gene, we measured competition by templates for defined fractions of this machinery. We find that the tRNA(AlaSG) gene is greatly impaired, in comparison with the tRNA(AlaC) gene, in competition for either TFIIIB or RNA polymerase III. Competition for each of these fractions is also strongly influenced by the nature of the 5' flanking sequence, the promoter element responsible for the distinctive transcriptional properties of tRNA(AlaSG) and tRNA(AlaC) genes. These results suggest that differential interaction with TFIIIB or RNA polymerase III is a critical functional distinction between these genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document