Hierarchical structure of one-dimensional J-aggregates

1997 ◽  
Vol 72-74 ◽  
pp. 38-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Kazuhiko Misawa
RSC Advances ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (16) ◽  
pp. 12953-12958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keumyoung Seo ◽  
Taekyung Lim ◽  
Edmund M. Mills ◽  
Sangtae Kim ◽  
Sanghyun Ju

A hierarchical structure of one-dimensional CeO2/SnO2 core–shell nanowires on a three-dimensional porous disk (namely the “nanowire forest”) could maximize the reaction surface area and avoid coarsening during hydrogen generation.


J-Aggregates ◽  
1996 ◽  
pp. 41-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Misawa ◽  
Takayoshi Kobayashi

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-S18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Gutiérrez ◽  
José Ruiz ◽  
Josep Maria Peri ◽  
Miguel Gárriz ◽  
Gemma Vall ◽  
...  

A dimensional classification seems to be the next move in the personality disorders field. However, it is not clear whether there is one dimensional model or many, or whether the currently available dimensional instruments measure the same traits. To help clarify these issues, the authors administered the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology (DAPP-BQ) to 414 psychiatric outpatients. Factor analyses showed that a common hierarchical structure underlies both instruments, even if each one measures slightly different aspects of it. Disattenuated correlations indicated that, at the lower order level, two thirds of the PID-5 and DAPP-BQ facets measure essentially the same traits, although the pairings were not exactly as predicted. Among higher order domains, only PID Negative Affectivity and Detachment converged unambiguously with DAPP Emotional Dysregulation and Inhibition. Overall, the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ reflect, with small divergences, one and the same structure of pathological personality traits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document