scholarly journals Experience with the Wada-Cutter valve prosthesis in the aortic area

1970 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viking Olov Björk
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Böning ◽  
S Haberer ◽  
UP Rosendahl ◽  
I Florath ◽  
JC Ennker

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Photiadis ◽  
M. Musci ◽  
O. Miera ◽  
S. Ovroutski ◽  
A. Mekkawy ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan ◽  
Faizan Imran Bawany ◽  
Asadullah Khan ◽  
Mehwish Hussain

<p><b>Background:</b> Small aortic prosthesis can lead to prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). Implanting such small prosthesis remains a controversial issue. This study was done to investigate whether or not PPM causes an increased operative mortality in aortic valve replacement (AVR).</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Two-hundred-two consecutive patients undergoing primary AVR in a tertiary hospital were included. The sample was grouped according to the aortic valve prosthesis size: ?21 mm (small) and >21 mm (standard). The effect of variables on outcomes was determined by univariate and multivariable regression analyses.</p><p><b>Results:</b> PPM was found significantly more among patients with AVR ? 21mm (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Moreover, the likelihood of mortality also was significantly higher in these patients (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Univariate analysis demonstrated small prosthesis size, urgent operation, PPM, female gender, and NYHA Class IV as significant predictors of mortality. Multivariate regression identified female gender, PPM, and urgent operation as the key independent predictors of mortality.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> PPM and female gender are significant predictors of mortality. Care should be taken to prevent PPM by implanting larger prosthesis especially in females.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e44
Author(s):  
E. Mikus ◽  
M. Pagliaro ◽  
S. Calvi ◽  
M. Panzavolta ◽  
E. Ramoni ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110025
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Konstantinou ◽  
Sven Peterss ◽  
Jan Stana ◽  
Barbara Rantner ◽  
Ramin Banafsche ◽  
...  

Purpose To present a novel technique to successfully cross a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. Technique A 55-year-old female patient with genetically verified Marfan syndrome presented with a 5-cm anastomotic aneurysm of the proximal aortic arch after previous ascending aortic replacement due to a type A aortic dissection in 2007. The patient also underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement in 1991. A 3-stage hybrid repair was planned. The first 2 steps included debranching of the supra-aortic vessels. In the third procedure, a custom-made double branched endovascular stent-graft with a short 35-mm introducer tip was implanted. The mechanical valve was passed with the tip of the dilator on the lateral site of the leaflet, without destructing the valve and with only mild symptoms of aortic insufficiency, as one leaflet continued to work. This allowed the implantation of the stent-graft directly distally of the coronary arteries. Postoperative computed tomography angiography showed no endoleaks and patent coronary and supra-aortic vessels. Conclusion Passing a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis at the proper position is feasible and allows adequate endovascular treatment in complex arch anatomy. However, caution should be taken during positioning of the endovascular graft as the tip may potentially damage the valve prosthesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document