Missing -ing in reading: Letter detection errors on word endings

1980 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Drewnowski ◽  
Alice F. Healy
Keyword(s):  
1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice F. Healy ◽  
David W. Fendrich ◽  
Janet D. Proctor
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Tao ◽  
Alice F. Healy ◽  
Lyle E. Bourne

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Nanjappa ◽  
Robert M. McPeek

ABSTRACTWhile aiming and shooting, we make tiny eye movements called microsaccades that shift gaze between task-relevant objects within a small region. However, in the brief period before pressing trigger, microsaccades are suppressed. This might be due to the lack of the requirement to shift gaze as the retinal images of the two objects start overlapping on fovea. Or we might be actively suppressing microsaccades to prevent any disturbances in visual perception caused by microsaccades around the time of their occurrence and their subsequent effect on shooting performance.In this study we looked at microsaccade rate while participants performed a simulated shooting task under two conditions: normal viewing in which they moved their eyes freely and eccentric condition in which they maintained gaze on a fixed target while performing shooting task at 5° eccentricity. As expected, microsaccade rate dropped at the end of the task in the normal viewing condition. However, we found the same for the eccentric condition in which microsaccade did not shift gaze between the task objects.Microsaccades are also produced in response to shifts in covert attention. To test whether disengagement of covert attention from eccentric shooting location caused the drop in microsaccade rate, we monitored participant’s spatial attention location by employing a RSVP task simultaneously at a location opposite to the shooting task. Target letter detection at RSVP location did not improve during the drop in microsaccade rate, suggesting that covert attention was maintained at the shooting task location.We conclude that in addition to their usual gaze-shifting function, microsaccades during fine acuity tasks might be modulated by cognitive processes other than spatial attention.


i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/i0421 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 458-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory A. Rieth ◽  
Kang Lee ◽  
Jiangang Lui ◽  
Jie Tian ◽  
David E. Huber
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond M. Klein ◽  
Jean Saint-Aubin

Understanding reading is a central issue for psychology, with major societal implications. Over the past five decades, a simple letter-detection task has been used as a window on the psycholinguistic processes involved in reading. When readers are asked to read a text for comprehension while marking with a pencil all instances of a target letter, they miss some of the letters in a systematic way known as the missing-letter effect. In the current article, we review evidence from studies that have emphasized neuroimaging, eye movement, rapid serial visual presentation, and auditory passages. As we review, the missing-letter effect captures a wide variety of cognitive processes, including lexical activation, attention, and extraction of phrase structure. To account for the large set of findings generated by studies of the missing-letter effect, we advanced an attentional-disengagement model that is rooted in how attention is allocated to and disengaged from lexical items during reading, which we have recently shown applies equally to listening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document